Posted: Wed May 13, 2009 4:01 pm
As Bob said, links 2 and 3 are more anti-Gibbs than anti-Snyder. I'm not doing your research and 'trusting' they're there...
Washington football community discussions spanning the Redskins to Commanders era. 20+ years of game analysis, player discussions, and fan perspectives.
https://the-hogs.net/messageboard/
SnyderSucks wrote:DEHog wrote:
Are you secretly JLC?
Nope, although I might have to start answering the phone in the manner you suggest!
If I had JLC's job, I would probably already have been fired for using the blog to organize Anti-Snyder rallys at Redskins Park.
SnyderSucks wrote:Sorry, I must have grabbed the wrong name when copying the earlier post.
I believe Snyder went to Gibbs in desperation and ask for his help. I don’t think Gibbs wanted to come back (and I think it showed in his coaching) but Gibbs is a very “giving” person and he saw the need of the organization and he saw all the good he could do with the money Snyder was willing to pay him. I think the fact that he took this team to the playoffs twice (when he didn’t really want to be here) is a testament to how good he really is.
Chris Luva Luva wrote:I feel priveleged to have been able to witness him as a HC. I feel that with the proper backing, he would have had even more success here. Joe was rusty when it came to todays NFL. The things that made him legendary didn't change with time but the nuances of the game did. IMO Joe had idiots backing him up... If Joe had a good GM backing him and an owner who could leave NFL busines to NFL minds, he would have been put into a position to succeed further. My problem with Danny right now is that he's out to prove to the world he isn't an idiot.
IF Danny takes his hand out of the jar, he proves his detractors right especially if it results in success. But he's so frickin arrogant and spiteful that he won't take his hand out of the jar. He's going to keep doing his thing until he strikes gold, just so he can say "I told you so!". He wants to have the last laugh and its at our expense. To me, that's not an owner who loves the team or is grateful to the fans. That's an owner that charges money to watch a team practice.... He's a jerk, I can't stand him but I do give him credit for changing however grudgingly it may be...
I enjoy the fact that this stuff eats at his soul...because for those of his who love this team, his stupid actions eat at us. I don't Snyder loves or appreciates me anymore than I think Micrsoft loves me for buying a Xbox. He cares about my money and to him, I flip the bird.
Redskin in Canada wrote:funding for this site.
Redskin in Canada wrote:If it was not for posts like this one from oneof the mods, I would be very suspicious about the origin of the funding for this site. Extreme Skins Jr anybody?
The true difference between Gibbs I and Gibbs II is:
Mr. Jack K Cooke v. Danny 'the clown' Snyder.
Countertrey wrote:RIC says:The true difference between Gibbs I and Gibbs II is:
Mr. Jack K Cooke v. Danny 'the clown' Snyder.
Perhaps...
Frankly, I don't know that there is that much difference between Cooke and Snyder.
The difference was Beathard... and no real free agency... and no salary caps... and "taxi squads"... and stashing quality backups on IR... and a coach who hadn't been out of the game for over 15 years... and, knowing how to take advantage of player strikes...
yupchagee wrote:Countertrey wrote:RIC says:The true difference between Gibbs I and Gibbs II is:
Mr. Jack K Cooke v. Danny 'the clown' Snyder.
Perhaps...
Frankly, I don't know that there is that much difference between Cooke and Snyder.
The difference was Beathard... and no real free agency... and no salary caps... and "taxi squads"... and stashing quality backups on IR... and a coach who hadn't been out of the game for over 15 years... and, knowing how to take advantage of player strikes...
The difference in owners is big. Cooke was smart enough to hire football men & let them run the team. Snyder isn't.
Countertrey wrote:RIC says:The true difference between Gibbs I and Gibbs II is:
Mr. Jack K Cooke v. Danny 'the clown' Snyder.
Perhaps...
Frankly, I don't know that there is that much difference between Cooke and Snyder.
Countertrey wrote:The difference was Beathard... and no real free agency... and no salary caps... and "taxi squads"... and stashing quality backups on IR... and a coach who hadn't been out of the game for over 15 years... and, knowing how to take advantage of player strikes...
SkinsFreak wrote:I completely understand that some don't like him or don't think he's done well with the Redskins. But to say he has no football or NFL experience is ludicrous and completely inaccurate. He's been in a GM role for only two years now with the Skins, and so far, he's done pretty well.
ex·per·tise
Pronunciation:\ˌek-(ˌ)spər-ˈtēz, -ˈtēs\
Function:noun
Etymology:French, from Middle French, expertness, from expert
Date:1868
1 : expert opinion or commentary
2 : the skill of an expert
Main Entry:1ex·pe·ri·ence
Pronunciation:\ik-ˈspir-ē-ən(t)s\
Function:noun
Etymology:Middle English, from Anglo-French, from Latin experientia act of trying, from experient-, experiens, present participle of experiri to try, from ex- + -periri (akin to periculum attempt) — more at fear
Date:14th century
1 a: direct observation of or participation in events as a basis of knowledge b: the fact or state of having been affected by or gained knowledge through direct observation or participation
2 a: practical knowledge, skill, or practice derived from direct observation of or participation in events or in a particular activity b: the length of such participation <has 10 years' experience in the job>
3 a: the conscious events that make up an individual life b: the events that make up the conscious past of a community or nation or humankind generally
4: something personally encountered, undergone, or lived through
5: the act or process of directly perceiving events or reality
DEHog wrote:I don’t think Vinny gets to make many decisions by him self but for the sake of this argument let’s assume he’s the man…How many coaches have to get fired before you realize it’s not the coaching??? Shouldn’t Vinny go before Zorn??
Redskin in Canada wrote:Let the RECORD speak for himself instead of apologizing for BOTH of these clowns.
SkinsFreak wrote:DEHog wrote:I don’t think Vinny gets to make many decisions by him self but for the sake of this argument let’s assume he’s the man…How many coaches have to get fired before you realize it’s not the coaching??? Shouldn’t Vinny go before Zorn??
Vinny has been involved with scouting and recruiting during his tenure here. It's only been the past two years since he's been in a "GM" position. Was Gibbs fired or did he simply retire for the 2nd time? I've been pretty busy at work the past few weeks... has Zorn been recently fired?
DEHog wrote:SkinsFreak wrote:DEHog wrote:I don’t think Vinny gets to make many decisions by him self but for the sake of this argument let’s assume he’s the man…How many coaches have to get fired before you realize it’s not the coaching??? Shouldn’t Vinny go before Zorn??
Vinny has been involved with scouting and recruiting during his tenure here. It's only been the past two years since he's been in a "GM" position. Was Gibbs fired or did he simply retire for the 2nd time? I've been pretty busy at work the past few weeks... has Zorn been recently fired?
Come on SF you can do better than that!! You know my point is that Vinny has been here since DS brought the team....with the exception of Marty who fired him....my point is how many coaches have to fail before we look at Vinny??
SkinsFreak wrote:DEHog wrote:SkinsFreak wrote:DEHog wrote:I don’t think Vinny gets to make many decisions by him self but for the sake of this argument let’s assume he’s the man…How many coaches have to get fired before you realize it’s not the coaching??? Shouldn’t Vinny go before Zorn??
Vinny has been involved with scouting and recruiting during his tenure here. It's only been the past two years since he's been in a "GM" position. Was Gibbs fired or did he simply retire for the 2nd time? I've been pretty busy at work the past few weeks... has Zorn been recently fired?
Come on SF you can do better than that!! You know my point is that Vinny has been here since DS brought the team....with the exception of Marty who fired him....my point is how many coaches have to fail before we look at Vinny??
I simply offered facts about Vinny's prior experience, as some continue to assert that he has none.
Before he was promoted, he was simply employed in the field of scouting and recruiting, something he excelled at with the 9er's and when he worked for Lou Holtz. He was promoted by those organizations as well, after they won championships.
He's only been "the man" in DC for two years and no coaches have been fired during that time. That's all I'm suggesting. Further, there's overwhelming evidence that many coaches had more influence on player acquisitions prior to his promotion to VP, or the acting GM. It is MY OPINION that since he's been the man for the past two years, he's done fairly well. This will be the 2nd season that he's been the man, so I'll reserve judgment on his "GM skills" until after this season has been played.
SkinsFreak wrote:DEHog wrote:SkinsFreak wrote:DEHog wrote:I don’t think Vinny gets to make many decisions by him self but for the sake of this argument let’s assume he’s the man…How many coaches have to get fired before you realize it’s not the coaching??? Shouldn’t Vinny go before Zorn??
Vinny has been involved with scouting and recruiting during his tenure here. It's only been the past two years since he's been in a "GM" position. Was Gibbs fired or did he simply retire for the 2nd time? I've been pretty busy at work the past few weeks... has Zorn been recently fired?
Come on SF you can do better than that!! You know my point is that Vinny has been here since DS brought the team....with the exception of Marty who fired him....my point is how many coaches have to fail before we look at Vinny??
I simply offered facts about Vinny's prior experience, as some continue to assert that he has none.
Before he was promoted, he was simply employed in the field of scouting and recruiting, something he excelled at with the 9er's and when he worked for Lou Holtz. He was promoted by those organizations as well, after they won championships.
He's only been "the man" in DC for two years and no coaches have been fired during that time. That's all I'm suggesting. Further, there's overwhelming evidence that many coaches had more influence on player acquisitions prior to his promotion to VP, or the acting GM. It is MY OPINION that since he's been the man for the past two years, he's done fairly well. This will be the 2nd season that he's been the man, so I'll reserve judgment on his "GM skills" until after this season has been played.
SkinsFreak wrote:Redskin in Canada wrote:Let the RECORD speak for himself instead of apologizing for BOTH of these clowns.
Stupid post of the year award.
So me where I've made any apology for either.
You said... "Let real NFL people do NFL work. That is all."
SnyderSucks wrote:They still appear willing to mortgage the future and sacrifice depth for the "big name". Last years pursuit of Chad Johnson, this year for Cutler, then Sanchez.