Posted: Sat Jan 17, 2009 9:26 am
It sucks that we could have traded Rocky (and more obviously) for Lance Briggs but declined.
Washington football community discussions spanning the Redskins to Commanders era. 20+ years of game analysis, player discussions, and fan perspectives.
https://the-hogs.net/messageboard/
and more obviously
Skinsfan55 wrote:I believe it was a 50 dollar gift card
brad7686 wrote:funbunch65 wrote:I agree we need a DT, but I also think we need a DE just as bad. I would actually prefer that we take a DE with the 13th pick. There will be 3 OT's gone by the time we pick so we shouldn't reach on an OT. We should adress the Dline with the 13th pick if we stay put. If our front office is hellbent on taking an OT we should definately trade back a get a couple extra picks.
Even if three OT's were gone, it would not be reaching to take the fourth at 13. OT is rather stacked with talent this draft.
PulpExposure wrote:Skinsfan55 wrote:I believe it was a 50 dollar gift card
In the form of a 1st round draft pick...
PulpExposure wrote:Skinsfan55 wrote:I believe it was a 50 dollar gift card
In the form of a 1st round draft pick...
funbunch65 wrote:brad7686 wrote:funbunch65 wrote:I agree we need a DT, but I also think we need a DE just as bad. I would actually prefer that we take a DE with the 13th pick. There will be 3 OT's gone by the time we pick so we shouldn't reach on an OT. We should adress the Dline with the 13th pick if we stay put. If our front office is hellbent on taking an OT we should definately trade back a get a couple extra picks.
Even if three OT's were gone, it would not be reaching to take the fourth at 13. OT is rather stacked with talent this draft.
I can agree with this statement if one of the following fall to 13: Andre Smith, Eugene Monroe, Jason Smith, or Otah. I would actually like to grab Raji or Orakpo over Otah though.
brad7686 wrote:funbunch65 wrote:brad7686 wrote:funbunch65 wrote:I agree we need a DT, but I also think we need a DE just as bad. I would actually prefer that we take a DE with the 13th pick. There will be 3 OT's gone by the time we pick so we shouldn't reach on an OT. We should adress the Dline with the 13th pick if we stay put. If our front office is hellbent on taking an OT we should definately trade back a get a couple extra picks.
Even if three OT's were gone, it would not be reaching to take the fourth at 13. OT is rather stacked with talent this draft.
I can agree with this statement if one of the following fall to 13: Andre Smith, Eugene Monroe, Jason Smith, or Otah. I would actually like to grab Raji or Orakpo over Otah though.
Do you mean Oher? Otah was drafted last year i believe. Raji could be a good pickup, I'm not sure Orakpo will be a 4-3 DE, especially since we already send Carter out there at his size, but i could be wrong. I like Oher as much as Monroe and J. Smith, because his arms are gonna hold up well in the NFL in pass blocking. He's also a powerful run blocker. Andre Smith is huge but will be gone I would think.
Wahoo McDaniels wrote:I reiterate my previous posts...what gives anybody any confidence in our scouting department? Read the following on the Malcolm Kelly pick. Why did we pick him? This is ludicrous...as a presumably good business man (Snyder), shouldn't you always be on the "value" side of a deal and not be getting taken by even Tom, Dick, and Malcolm?
http://www.tradingmarkets.com/.site/new ... s/2132309/
Even though the NFL Draft Advisory Committee projected Kelly as a second-rounder, Kelly skipped his senior season and entered the draft, where he was taken by the Redskins with the 51st overall pick.
But, according to the source, Kelly faced an unusual circumstance that forced his hand.
"Malcolm's situation was different, as a lot of people have figured out. Malcolm had knee problems. The reason he slipped (in the draft) is because they knew about his knee. There's not a lot of cartilage in there," said the source, referring to a knee injury that kept Kelly inactive for all but five games of his rookie season.
"He's in the process of addressing it now. But had Malcolm been able to play in five games this year at OU, where would he be now? An undrafted free agent. That's why he had to get while the getting was still good."
fleetus wrote:Wahoo McDaniels wrote:I reiterate my previous posts...what gives anybody any confidence in our scouting department? Read the following on the Malcolm Kelly pick. Why did we pick him? This is ludicrous...as a presumably good business man (Snyder), shouldn't you always be on the "value" side of a deal and not be getting taken by even Tom, Dick, and Malcolm?
http://www.tradingmarkets.com/.site/new ... s/2132309/
Even though the NFL Draft Advisory Committee projected Kelly as a second-rounder, Kelly skipped his senior season and entered the draft, where he was taken by the Redskins with the 51st overall pick.
But, according to the source, Kelly faced an unusual circumstance that forced his hand.
"Malcolm's situation was different, as a lot of people have figured out. Malcolm had knee problems. The reason he slipped (in the draft) is because they knew about his knee. There's not a lot of cartilage in there," said the source, referring to a knee injury that kept Kelly inactive for all but five games of his rookie season.
"He's in the process of addressing it now. But had Malcolm been able to play in five games this year at OU, where would he be now? An undrafted free agent. That's why he had to get while the getting was still good."
Drafting a player who is injured is not always a bad idea. Every situation is different. The Bills drafted McGahee 23rd after he blew out his knee and couldn't even participate in the Scouting combine. Most experts rated him as a 2nd or 3rd round gamble but the Bills fared pretty well.
If Kelly was viewed as a top 15 talent that could be had at #51 because of an injury they felt confident could be rehabbed, then I'd say it was a calculated gamble. Either way, it is pretty silly to think Snyder and Cerrato were not aware of it and didn't consider the issue at all.
fleetus wrote:Wahoo McDaniels wrote:I reiterate my previous posts...what gives anybody any confidence in our scouting department? Read the following on the Malcolm Kelly pick. Why did we pick him? This is ludicrous...as a presumably good business man (Snyder), shouldn't you always be on the "value" side of a deal and not be getting taken by even Tom, Dick, and Malcolm?
http://www.tradingmarkets.com/.site/new ... s/2132309/
Even though the NFL Draft Advisory Committee projected Kelly as a second-rounder, Kelly skipped his senior season and entered the draft, where he was taken by the Redskins with the 51st overall pick.
But, according to the source, Kelly faced an unusual circumstance that forced his hand.
"Malcolm's situation was different, as a lot of people have figured out. Malcolm had knee problems. The reason he slipped (in the draft) is because they knew about his knee. There's not a lot of cartilage in there," said the source, referring to a knee injury that kept Kelly inactive for all but five games of his rookie season.
"He's in the process of addressing it now. But had Malcolm been able to play in five games this year at OU, where would he be now? An undrafted free agent. That's why he had to get while the getting was still good."
Drafting a player who is injured is not always a bad idea. Every situation is different. The Bills drafted McGahee 23rd after he blew out his knee and couldn't even participate in the Scouting combine. Most experts rated him as a 2nd or 3rd round gamble but the Bills fared pretty well.
If Kelly was viewed as a top 15 talent that could be had at #51 because of an injury they felt confident could be rehabbed, then I'd say it was a calculated gamble. Either way, it is pretty silly to think Snyder and Cerrato were not aware of it and didn't consider the issue at all.
Wahoo McDaniels wrote:I have learned that you can never underestimate the incompetency of the Skins front office in a Snyder ownership.
SkinsFreak wrote:Wahoo McDaniels wrote:I have learned that you can never underestimate the incompetency of the Skins front office in a Snyder ownership.
Then you must have quite on the learning process a long time ago. Just because you've ceased with continual education doesn't mean the world has stopped rotating and hasn't evolved since.
Through the years I've LEARNED that the FO makes little sense in their personel decisions.Wahoo McDaniels wrote:SkinsFreak wrote:Wahoo McDaniels wrote:I have learned that you can never underestimate the incompetency of the Skins front office in a Snyder ownership.
Then you must have quite on the learning process a long time ago. Just because you've ceased with continual education doesn't mean the world has stopped rotating and hasn't evolved since.
What? I'm gonna need a decoder ring to figure out what this one means....did you mean "quit" instead of "quite"....did you mean "continuing education" instead of "continual education"?
Spell check could have been an option or possibly re-reading the post before hitting the "Submit" button....
...and there's always the possibility that you were under the inference of a halluocengeneric drug when you made this post.
Wahoo McDaniels wrote:SkinsFreak wrote:Wahoo McDaniels wrote:I have learned that you can never underestimate the incompetency of the Skins front office in a Snyder ownership.
Then you must have quite on the learning process a long time ago. Just because you've ceased with continual education doesn't mean the world has stopped rotating and hasn't evolved since.
What? I'm gonna need a decoder ring to figure out what this one means....did you mean "quit" instead of "quite"....did you mean "continuing education" instead of "continual education"?
Spell check could have been an option or possibly re-reading the post before hitting the "Submit" button....
...and there's always the possibility that you were under the inference of a halluocengeneric drug when you made this post.
Wahoo McDaniels wrote:fleetus wrote:Wahoo McDaniels wrote:I reiterate my previous posts...what gives anybody any confidence in our scouting department? Read the following on the Malcolm Kelly pick. Why did we pick him? This is ludicrous...as a presumably good business man (Snyder), shouldn't you always be on the "value" side of a deal and not be getting taken by even Tom, Dick, and Malcolm?
http://www.tradingmarkets.com/.site/new ... s/2132309/
Even though the NFL Draft Advisory Committee projected Kelly as a second-rounder, Kelly skipped his senior season and entered the draft, where he was taken by the Redskins with the 51st overall pick.
But, according to the source, Kelly faced an unusual circumstance that forced his hand.
"Malcolm's situation was different, as a lot of people have figured out. Malcolm had knee problems. The reason he slipped (in the draft) is because they knew about his knee. There's not a lot of cartilage in there," said the source, referring to a knee injury that kept Kelly inactive for all but five games of his rookie season.
"He's in the process of addressing it now. But had Malcolm been able to play in five games this year at OU, where would he be now? An undrafted free agent. That's why he had to get while the getting was still good."
Drafting a player who is injured is not always a bad idea. Every situation is different. The Bills drafted McGahee 23rd after he blew out his knee and couldn't even participate in the Scouting combine. Most experts rated him as a 2nd or 3rd round gamble but the Bills fared pretty well.
If Kelly was viewed as a top 15 talent that could be had at #51 because of an injury they felt confident could be rehabbed, then I'd say it was a calculated gamble. Either way, it is pretty silly to think Snyder and Cerrato were not aware of it and didn't consider the issue at all.
I would have agreed with you in the past if it weren't for two recent and very visible free agent additions that point to the contrary: Brandon Lloyd and Adam Archleta.
With Archuleta in particular, the book on him was that he a "spent" player like a punch drunk boxer. Everybody in the league (except Lovie Smith) was shocked that the Skins paid him like they did. There were only two teams involved in the bidding war...the Skins and the Bears. Both eventually got the short end of the "Archuleta stick" over the next couple years.
So, what past history makes you believe, in any way the Skins, have any idea what they are doing? I have learned that you can never underestimate the incompetency of the Skins front office in a Snyder ownership.