KazooSkinsFan wrote:DEHog wrote:KazooSkinsFan wrote:Fios wrote:Stupid pick, it just further alienates moderates
Not sure I agree with this for one reason, Hillary supporters. Hillary and Obama agreed on all the issues, the question was if liberals wanted a black or woman president. McCain was targeting the ones who wanted a "woman." He doesn't need to snare many of them. It may work, it may not, but I don't see how it hurts him. There are a bunch of libbies who won't vote for him because of Palin, the same ones who weren't going to vote for him anyway.
Agreed...If Condie Rice wasn't so tainted by Bush she'd be a nice pick for the GOP
I had some early interest in her. She did a great job representing this country at State, way better then I thought any Bush appointee could do. But she never gave any reason beyond that to have any idea of what she believes on anything. Maybe appropriate for State but not for a candidate.
Also, she was asked if she supported McCain or Obama and said she wasn't revealing that. I considered that a bizarre response for a senior Republican to not know if they are supporting their party candidate or a Marxist, terrorist appeasing Democrat. Even McCain when undercutting Bush in 2004 came out and said he was for Bush. I'm not a politico, but there was no reason for her to be cagey in that choice. State is not a non-partisan office.
Maybe she's supporting Bush's third term, which the public doesn't know about yet.
