Brandon Lloyd looking good for the Bears

Talk about the AFC, NFC, the NFL Draft, College Football... anything football that has no Washington Football Team relevance.
User avatar
Deadskins
JSPB22
JSPB22
Posts: 18392
youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 10:03 am
Location: Location, LOCATION!

Post by Deadskins »

GSPODS wrote:I never saw enough passes within Lloyd's reach to label him a bust. The question is if those passes were off because of the QB or because Lloyd was running the wrong routes. My guess is that since Lloyd saw the field so infrequently, he was probably running the wrong routes AND the passes were off. It does take some practice for a QB and a receiver to get on the same page with eath other's tendencies. Less than two opportunities per game wouldn't allow any two players to get "on the same page" in my opinion. Who is to blame for the limited opportunities? I blame Saunders and Gibbs both. When your other options are Keenan McCardell and Reche Caldwell what is there to lose by having at least a remote deep threat on the field? Especially when your two best receivers are either out or playing injured and at half-speed. Nothing, in my opinion, but that is also why I'm not getting any calls to coach the Skins.

He was in the offense for an entire season the year before last. He had many, many balls thrown his way during his time in Washington. I say move on already. It's water under the bridge.
Andre Carter wrote:Damn man, you know your football.


Hog Bowl IV Champion (2012)

Hail to the Redskins!
yupchagee
#14
#14
Posts: 4536
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 2:50 pm
Location: Louisville KY

Post by yupchagee »

I never saw enough passes within Lloyd's reach to label him a bust. The question is if those passes were off because of the QB or because Lloyd was running the wrong routes. My guess is that since Lloyd saw the field so infrequently, he was probably running the wrong routes AND the passes were off. It does take some practice for a QB and a receiver to get on the same page with eath other's tendencies. Less than two opportunities per game wouldn't allow any two players to get "on the same page" in my opinion. Who is to blame for the limited opportunities? I blame Saunders and Gibbs both. When your other options are Keenan McCardell and Reche Caldwell what is there to lose by having at least a remote deep threat on the field? Especially when your two best receivers are either out or playing injured and at half-speed. Nothing, in my opinion, but that is also why I'm not getting any calls to coach the Skins.

Maybe the reason that not many passes were thrown to him is that he rarely managed to get open.
Skins fan since '55

"The constitution is not a suicide pact"- Abraham Lincoln
GSPODS
Hog
Posts: 4716
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 10:20 am

Post by GSPODS »

yupchagee wrote:
I never saw enough passes within Lloyd's reach to label him a bust. The question is if those passes were off because of the QB or because Lloyd was running the wrong routes. My guess is that since Lloyd saw the field so infrequently, he was probably running the wrong routes AND the passes were off. It does take some practice for a QB and a receiver to get on the same page with eath other's tendencies. Less than two opportunities per game wouldn't allow any two players to get "on the same page" in my opinion. Who is to blame for the limited opportunities? I blame Saunders and Gibbs both. When your other options are Keenan McCardell and Reche Caldwell what is there to lose by having at least a remote deep threat on the field? Especially when your two best receivers are either out or playing injured and at half-speed. Nothing, in my opinion, but that is also why I'm not getting any calls to coach the Skins.

Maybe the reason that not many passes were thrown to him is that he rarely managed to get open.


Possible. Any number of reasons are possible. All I'm getting at is that the Bears are still giving Lloyd another chance. They haven't cut him yet, and they probably won't. He might be worth far more to the Bears than he was worth to the Redskins. That seems to happen frequently. A good number of players left the Redskins and suddenly improved drastically with another team. I'd like an explanation as to why, but that is another thread topic for another time. All I'm getting at is that BearSkins and the Bears fans shouldn't write Brandon Lloyd off just yet. My 2 cents
VetSkinsFan
One Step Away
One Step Away
Posts: 7652
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 9:31 am
Location: NoVA

Post by VetSkinsFan »

GSPODS wrote:
yupchagee wrote:
I never saw enough passes within Lloyd's reach to label him a bust. The question is if those passes were off because of the QB or because Lloyd was running the wrong routes. My guess is that since Lloyd saw the field so infrequently, he was probably running the wrong routes AND the passes were off. It does take some practice for a QB and a receiver to get on the same page with eath other's tendencies. Less than two opportunities per game wouldn't allow any two players to get "on the same page" in my opinion. Who is to blame for the limited opportunities? I blame Saunders and Gibbs both. When your other options are Keenan McCardell and Reche Caldwell what is there to lose by having at least a remote deep threat on the field? Especially when your two best receivers are either out or playing injured and at half-speed. Nothing, in my opinion, but that is also why I'm not getting any calls to coach the Skins.


I"m still wondering where Walt Harris' skills came from when he went to the 49ers.
Maybe the reason that not many passes were thrown to him is that he rarely managed to get open.


Possible. Any number of reasons are possible. All I'm getting at is that the Bears are still giving Lloyd another chance. They haven't cut him yet, and they probably won't. He might be worth far more to the Bears than he was worth to the Redskins. That seems to happen frequently. A good number of players left the Redskins and suddenly improved drastically with another team. I'd like an explanation as to why, but that is another thread topic for another time. All I'm getting at is that BearSkins and the Bears fans shouldn't write Brandon Lloyd off just yet. My 2 cents
...any given Sunday....

RIP #21 Sean Taylor. You will be loved and adored by Redskins fans forever!!!!!

GSPODS:
The National Anthem sucks.
What a useless piece of propagandist rhetoric that is.
yupchagee
#14
#14
Posts: 4536
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 2:50 pm
Location: Louisville KY

Post by yupchagee »

GSPODS wrote:
yupchagee wrote:
I never saw enough passes within Lloyd's reach to label him a bust. The question is if those passes were off because of the QB or because Lloyd was running the wrong routes. My guess is that since Lloyd saw the field so infrequently, he was probably running the wrong routes AND the passes were off. It does take some practice for a QB and a receiver to get on the same page with eath other's tendencies. Less than two opportunities per game wouldn't allow any two players to get "on the same page" in my opinion. Who is to blame for the limited opportunities? I blame Saunders and Gibbs both. When your other options are Keenan McCardell and Reche Caldwell what is there to lose by having at least a remote deep threat on the field? Especially when your two best receivers are either out or playing injured and at half-speed. Nothing, in my opinion, but that is also why I'm not getting any calls to coach the Skins.

Maybe the reason that not many passes were thrown to him is that he rarely managed to get open.


Possible. Any number of reasons are possible. All I'm getting at is that the Bears are still giving Lloyd another chance. They haven't cut him yet, and they probably won't. He might be worth far more to the Bears than he was worth to the Redskins. That seems to happen frequently. A good number of players left the Redskins and suddenly improved drastically with another team. I'd like an explanation as to why, but that is another thread topic for another time. All I'm getting at is that BearSkins and the Bears fans shouldn't write Brandon Lloyd off just yet. My 2 cents


Fair enough.
Skins fan since '55

"The constitution is not a suicide pact"- Abraham Lincoln
KazooSkinsFan
kazoo
kazoo
Posts: 10293
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2004 4:00 pm
Location: Kazmania

Post by KazooSkinsFan »

GSPODS wrote:He might be worth far more to the Bears than he was worth to the Redskins. That seems to happen frequently. A good number of players left the Redskins and suddenly improved drastically with another team

Wow, Lloyd plays OK in the pre-season for Chicago and it's another Skin bashing opportunity? He played fine for us when it didn't count too. Lloyd blew for us because Lloyd blew. Lots of young players bounce around until they catch on with someone and eventually become good, but other then that who are you referring to?
Hail to the Redskins!

Groucho: Man does not control his own fate. The women in his life do that for him

Twain: A man who carries a cat by the tail learns something he can learn in no other way
GSPODS
Hog
Posts: 4716
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 10:20 am

Post by GSPODS »

KazooSkinsFan wrote:
GSPODS wrote:He might be worth far more to the Bears than he was worth to the Redskins. That seems to happen frequently. A good number of players left the Redskins and suddenly improved drastically with another team

Wow, Lloyd plays OK in the pre-season for Chicago and it's another Skin bashing opportunity? He played fine for us when it didn't count too. Lloyd blew for us because Lloyd blew. Lots of young players bounce around until they catch on with someone and eventually become good, but other then that who are you referring to?


I don't know how Brandon Lloyd has played for the Bears. I don't get those games. There is no "Skin Bashing" on my part. Lloyd did practice well. Lloyd didn't perform in a Redskins uniform in regular season games. It isn't remotely fair to blame 100% of that failed experiment on Brandon Lloyd.

If you're asking for names of specific players who either left or were cut or traded by the Redskins, and went on to be decent to good players elsewhere, this isn't the thread. I have to keep this discussion to Brandon Lloyd as a member of the Chicago Bears, or I will be hatted on.
User avatar
Deadskins
JSPB22
JSPB22
Posts: 18392
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 10:03 am
Location: Location, LOCATION!

Post by Deadskins »

GSPODS wrote:If you're asking for names of specific players who either left or were cut or traded by the Redskins, and went on to be decent to good players elsewhere, this isn't the thread. I have to keep this discussion to Brandon Lloyd as a member of the Chicago Bears, or I will be hatted on.

I'll be awaiting that new thread with baited breath.
Andre Carter wrote:Damn man, you know your football.


Hog Bowl IV Champion (2012)

Hail to the Redskins!
KazooSkinsFan
kazoo
kazoo
Posts: 10293
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2004 4:00 pm
Location: Kazmania

Post by KazooSkinsFan »

JSPB22 wrote:
GSPODS wrote:If you're asking for names of specific players who either left or were cut or traded by the Redskins, and went on to be decent to good players elsewhere, this isn't the thread. I have to keep this discussion to Brandon Lloyd as a member of the Chicago Bears, or I will be hatted on.

I'll be awaiting that new thread with baited breath.

It's already well on the second page. The list was provided with the caveat they didn't meet the criteria. :hmm:

Lloyd and the Bears weren't on the list. :up:
Hail to the Redskins!

Groucho: Man does not control his own fate. The women in his life do that for him

Twain: A man who carries a cat by the tail learns something he can learn in no other way
User avatar
1niksder
**********
**********
Posts: 16741
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 2:45 pm
Location: If I knew ... it would explain a lot but I've seen Homerville on a map, that wasn't helpful at all
Contact:

Post by 1niksder »

GSPODS wrote:Possible. Any number of reasons are possible. All I'm getting at is that the Bears are still giving Lloyd another chance. They haven't cut him yet, and they probably won't. He might be worth far more to the Bears than he was worth to the Redskins. That seems to happen frequently. A good number of players left the Redskins and suddenly improved drastically with another team. I'd like an explanation as to why, but that is another thread topic for another time. All I'm getting at is that BearSkins and the Bears fans shouldn't write Brandon Lloyd off just yet. My 2 cents


You could have said the same thing about AA and the Bears this time last year, but how did that work out.
..__..
{o,o}
|)__)
-"-"-

When you reach the end of your rope, tie a knot in it and hold on....

If the world didn't suck we'd all fall off
User avatar
BearSkins
Hog
Posts: 516
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2006 10:58 am
Location: Chicago (Aurora), via Scotland

Post by BearSkins »

Thanks. Just when it was getting safe to re-enter this thread AA gets brought up...

:D :P
It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom – for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself.
GSPODS
Hog
Posts: 4716
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 10:20 am

Post by GSPODS »

1niksder wrote:
GSPODS wrote:Possible. Any number of reasons are possible. All I'm getting at is that the Bears are still giving Lloyd another chance. They haven't cut him yet, and they probably won't. He might be worth far more to the Bears than he was worth to the Redskins. That seems to happen frequently. A good number of players left the Redskins and suddenly improved drastically with another team. I'd like an explanation as to why, but that is another thread topic for another time. All I'm getting at is that BearSkins and the Bears fans shouldn't write Brandon Lloyd off just yet. My 2 cents


You could have said the same thing about AA and the Bears this time last year, but how did that work out.


It didn't. What does AA have to do with Brandon Lloyd? Other than being another in a long line of Redskins personnel mistakes.
KazooSkinsFan
kazoo
kazoo
Posts: 10293
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2004 4:00 pm
Location: Kazmania

Post by KazooSkinsFan »

BearSkins wrote:Thanks. Just when it was getting safe to re-enter this thread AA gets brought up...

:D :P

AA was better then Lloyd. At least he could tackle and didn't have a bad attitude. Good luck with Lloyd. :lol:
Hail to the Redskins!

Groucho: Man does not control his own fate. The women in his life do that for him

Twain: A man who carries a cat by the tail learns something he can learn in no other way
User avatar
BearSkins
Hog
Posts: 516
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2006 10:58 am
Location: Chicago (Aurora), via Scotland

Post by BearSkins »

KazooSkinsFan wrote:AA was better then Lloyd. At least he could tackle.


:shock:

Sorry I must have teh wrong AA....I was talking about Adam Archuleta. :wink: :whistle:
It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom – for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself.
User avatar
1niksder
**********
**********
Posts: 16741
Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 2:45 pm
Location: If I knew ... it would explain a lot but I've seen Homerville on a map, that wasn't helpful at all
Contact:

Post by 1niksder »

GSPODS wrote:
1niksder wrote:
GSPODS wrote:Possible. Any number of reasons are possible. All I'm getting at is that the Bears are still giving Lloyd another chance. They haven't cut him yet, and they probably won't. He might be worth far more to the Bears than he was worth to the Redskins. That seems to happen frequently. A good number of players left the Redskins and suddenly improved drastically with another team. I'd like an explanation as to why, but that is another thread topic for another time. All I'm getting at is that BearSkins and the Bears fans shouldn't write Brandon Lloyd off just yet. My 2 cents


You could have said the same thing about AA and the Bears this time last year, but how did that work out.


It didn't. What does AA have to do with Brandon Lloyd? Other than being another in a long line of Redskins personnel mistakes.


It's the same thing that happened with Adam (signed a big deal but couldn't be dumped the next year because of the cap (unless someone footed part of the bill as Da Bears did after one year)), Same response from people like you the first time he did something worth putting in print (it had to be the Redskins FO). BLloyd wasn't a personnel mistake on the same level as AA. Not only was AA not a good fit on the field I believe he was still injured when he signed. Lloyd was productive before he got here and should have improved when here. Lloyd was just "handled" wrong or reacted wrong to the way he was being handled. Like I said earlier Lloyd isn't the same player he was when he got here. He plays special teams now, particapates fully practice and isn't complaining about playing time.
..__..
{o,o}
|)__)
-"-"-

When you reach the end of your rope, tie a knot in it and hold on....

If the world didn't suck we'd all fall off
yupchagee
#14
#14
Posts: 4536
Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 2:50 pm
Location: Louisville KY

Post by yupchagee »

BearSkins wrote:
KazooSkinsFan wrote:AA was better then Lloyd. At least he could tackle.


:shock:

Sorry I must have teh wrong AA....I was talking about Adam Archuleta. :wink: :whistle:


Oh. We thought you meant alcoholics anonymous :?
Skins fan since '55

"The constitution is not a suicide pact"- Abraham Lincoln
JansenFan
and Jackson
and Jackson
Posts: 8387
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2003 10:37 am
Location: Charles Town, WV
Contact:

Post by JansenFan »

1niksder wrote:He plays special teams now, particapates fully practice and isn't complaining about playing time.


He would have played special teams, had he been asked.
RIP 21

"Nah, I trust the laws of nature to stay constant. I don't pray that the sun will rise tomorrow, and I don't need to pray that someone will beat the Cowboys in the playoffs." - Irn-Bru
VetSkinsFan
One Step Away
One Step Away
Posts: 7652
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 9:31 am
Location: NoVA

Post by VetSkinsFan »

JansenFan wrote:
1niksder wrote:He plays special teams now, particapates fully practice and isn't complaining about playing time.


He would have played special teams, had he been asked.


With the lack of effort on the offense, would you really have wanted him in ST here?
...any given Sunday....

RIP #21 Sean Taylor. You will be loved and adored by Redskins fans forever!!!!!

GSPODS:
The National Anthem sucks.
What a useless piece of propagandist rhetoric that is.
JansenFan
and Jackson
and Jackson
Posts: 8387
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2003 10:37 am
Location: Charles Town, WV
Contact:

Post by JansenFan »

VetSkinsFan wrote:
JansenFan wrote:
1niksder wrote:He plays special teams now, particapates fully practice and isn't complaining about playing time.


He would have played special teams, had he been asked.


With the lack of effort on the offense, would you really have wanted him in ST here?


He's blocked one more punt this season than our current group. He also played ST almost exclusively his first year in SF, including time as a returner, so he's got experience. For us it would have made sense, particularly his second year here, when he was barely used on offense, and physically, the biggest he'd been in his entire career.
RIP 21

"Nah, I trust the laws of nature to stay constant. I don't pray that the sun will rise tomorrow, and I don't need to pray that someone will beat the Cowboys in the playoffs." - Irn-Bru
VetSkinsFan
One Step Away
One Step Away
Posts: 7652
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 9:31 am
Location: NoVA

Post by VetSkinsFan »

JansenFan wrote:
VetSkinsFan wrote:
JansenFan wrote:
1niksder wrote:He plays special teams now, particapates fully practice and isn't complaining about playing time.


He would have played special teams, had he been asked.


With the lack of effort on the offense, would you really have wanted him in ST here?


He's blocked one more punt this season than our current group. He also played ST almost exclusively his first year in SF, including time as a returner, so he's got experience. For us it would have made sense, particularly his second year here, when he was barely used on offense, and physically, the biggest he'd been in his entire career.


:idea: Stuff I didn't know. All I really knew about him is what he did here.
...any given Sunday....

RIP #21 Sean Taylor. You will be loved and adored by Redskins fans forever!!!!!

GSPODS:
The National Anthem sucks.
What a useless piece of propagandist rhetoric that is.
JansenFan
and Jackson
and Jackson
Posts: 8387
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2003 10:37 am
Location: Charles Town, WV
Contact:

Post by JansenFan »

Most people only know what the Post wrote, so don't feel too bad. :lol:
RIP 21

"Nah, I trust the laws of nature to stay constant. I don't pray that the sun will rise tomorrow, and I don't need to pray that someone will beat the Cowboys in the playoffs." - Irn-Bru
GSPODS
Hog
Posts: 4716
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 10:20 am

Post by GSPODS »

Brandon Lloyd caught one for the Bears in his first game, so it might be time to bump this thread. You're welcome, BearSkins. :lol:
VetSkinsFan
One Step Away
One Step Away
Posts: 7652
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 9:31 am
Location: NoVA

Post by VetSkinsFan »

B. Lloyd 2catch 26yd 18long

They were impressive catches, too. The 1st he had to get some height on and the second he had to cahtch on his knees. I'm glad he's getting off to a good start somewhere!
...any given Sunday....

RIP #21 Sean Taylor. You will be loved and adored by Redskins fans forever!!!!!

GSPODS:
The National Anthem sucks.
What a useless piece of propagandist rhetoric that is.
Chris Luva Luva
---
---
Posts: 18887
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 1:55 pm
Location: AJT
Contact:

Post by Chris Luva Luva »

It's a bit early but considering he had 0 catches for us at one point I think that it's safe to say Lloyd is added to the list of players Gibbs regime 2.0 completely mishandled.
The road to the number 1 pick gaining speed!
GSPODS
Hog
Posts: 4716
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2007 10:20 am

Post by GSPODS »

Chris Luva Luva wrote:It's a bit early but considering he had 0 catches for us at one point I think that it's safe to say Lloyd is added to the list of players Gibbs regime 2.0 completely mishandled.


I had the same thought, but only time will tell how much Lloyd was improperly used in a Redskins uniform. I'm almost afraid to know. It will make me start asking who else is being used incorrectly.
Post Reply