Page 3 of 3

Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:52 am
by GSPODS
0 - 0

Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 12:03 pm
by RayNAustin
I'm going out on a limb here.....I say Redskins 27 Dallas 24.

Re: Skins vs the Crackboys

Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 12:05 pm
by forskins
por-tiz2skins wrote: Dallas will score at least 30. The Skins don't stand a chance in this game. Even if they're able to pull off some kind of miracle and keep it close in the first half, you know how they always fold in the second half and Dallas will just run away with it. Be prepared, it's gonna be ugly!
OK? and they played and beaten who again?.I know your a cowboys fan but this is not the skins from before our D was actully pretty good sunday but it wasnt working cause of injury.The O is getting better so how do you know if our O will kill the cowboys D?.
20-17 Redskins.[/quote]

Your banged up secondary holding the Cowboys 3rd ranked passing offense / 2nd ranked offense to 17 points?? Now, that is some serious crack you got there. Hmm... let's compare how many teams they have beaten that the Redskins haven't. I mean seriously, the skins took Miami to overtime!

Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 12:09 pm
by GSPODS
=D> 0-0 =D>

Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 12:17 pm
by SkinMeAlive
Prediction:

Dallas fans will be trolling THN en masse.

Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 12:44 pm
by welch
Prediction:

Dallas fans will be trolling THN en masse.


Let them come, and let then be made "gone" quickly.

Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 12:49 pm
by GSPODS
welch wrote:
Prediction:

Dallas fans will be trolling THN en masse.


Let them come, and let then be made "gone" quickly.


I'd happily accept the fact that this Redskins team is just not very good if only they would do me the small favor of making the Dallas trolls vacate THN. Unfortunately, there is at least one troll who will be here regardless.
Of course, that particular troll will only be found in the Smack Forum if the Redskins happen to smack Dallas around today.

As far as I'm concerned, anything that keeps certain 'members' from trolling up the threads is all right by me, and only a Redskins victory is likely to achieve that goal. At least until the next game against Dallas.

Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 12:56 pm
by Montana Redskin
Why does everyone say Dallas is so great now because Parcells built them up so well? All this about they're great o line, receivers, dline,etc...

It's not that, its Romo? He's the only real reason they're 8-1...

Put Bledsoe back in there and their 6-4 at best.

Romo is the key, not TO, not Barber/Jones/their D/their OL...it's Romo.

We won't get any pressure by the D-line, so we we're gonna have to cover and blitz like banshees to beat these guys. We will win ONLY if we contain/disrupt Romo, see Buffalo.

It's not the cowboys to be scared of, just Romo.

Romo on, we're dead. Romo having bad game, we can win. Need picks and blitz sacks.

he IS THE main reason this team is so supposedly "great" right now and he is pretty darn good.

Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 1:19 pm
by forskins
sad week for your guys. I thought Dallas would bring out some diehards, but, it seems most of you guys have already packed it in for the season.

It's a shame really.

Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 1:24 pm
by GSPODS
forskins wrote:sad week for your guys. I thought Dallas would bring out some diehards, but, it seems most of you guys have already packed it in for the season.

It's a shame really.


:hmm: Strange observation coming from an uncut penis.
Equally strange observation: Dallas fans always disappear after a loss to the Redskins. If there's one thing I can't stand it's a fair-weather troll.

Re: Skins vs the Crackboys

Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 4:04 pm
by por-tiz2skins
forskins wrote:
por-tiz2skins wrote: Dallas will score at least 30. The Skins don't stand a chance in this game. Even if they're able to pull off some kind of miracle and keep it close in the first half, you know how they always fold in the second half and Dallas will just run away with it. Be prepared, it's gonna be ugly!
OK? and they played and beaten who again?.I know your a cowboys fan but this is not the skins from before our D was actully pretty good sunday but it wasnt working cause of injury.The O is getting better so how do you know if our O will kill the cowboys D?.
20-17 Redskins.


Your banged up secondary holding the Cowboys 3rd ranked passing offense / 2nd ranked offense to 17 points?? Now, that is some serious crack you got there. Hmm... let's compare how many teams they have beaten that the Redskins haven't. I mean seriously, the skins took Miami to overtime![/quote]Where becoming better on our O and the D is just injured,what has Dallas done?.They been healthy all year .

Re: Skins vs the Crackboys

Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 5:18 pm
by forskins
por-tiz2skins wrote:Where becoming better on our O and the D is just injured,what has Dallas done?.They been healthy all year .


Oh Dallas has only led the NFC in Offense this year.

We haven't had Henry and Newman starting all year. Ellis didn't start unitl later in the season. We lost Ferguson in the first game.

Keep talkin...

Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 5:23 pm
by GSPODS
What's with Portis' shoes?

Re: Skins vs the Crackboys

Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 9:36 pm
by por-tiz2skins
forskins wrote:
por-tiz2skins wrote:Where becoming better on our O and the D is just injured,what has Dallas done?.They been healthy all year .


Oh Dallas has only led the NFC in Offense this year.

We haven't had Henry and Newman starting all year. Ellis didn't start unitl later in the season. We lost Ferguson in the first game.

Keep talkin...
And still scored 24 points and got very luck enough Moss droped the gme winning TD.Its ok cause if thats all the healthy cowboys got them your done the next meeting.

Re: Skins vs the Crackboys

Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 9:44 pm
by BeeGee
por-tiz2skins wrote:
forskins wrote:
por-tiz2skins wrote:Where becoming better on our O and the D is just injured,what has Dallas done?.They been healthy all year .


Oh Dallas has only led the NFC in Offense this year.

We haven't had Henry and Newman starting all year. Ellis didn't start unitl later in the season. We lost Ferguson in the first game.

Keep talkin...
And still scored 24 points and got very luck enough Moss droped the gme winning TD.Its ok cause if thats all the healthy cowboys got them your done the next meeting.
Actually, wasn't it YOU that predicted a victory today? Didn't you have Portis going for 600 yds and 3 tds or something like that? C'mon with the predictions, dude.

Lotta Skins fans act as if they're the only team that's dealt with injuries all season. Our defense has had plenty of adversity to deal with. Luckily, our offense has been good enough to put a lot of points on the board all year.

Hopefully, we have T Glenn and A Henry for the rematch at the Fed. No crying about injuries, man. Everybody has injuries... you have a huge roster to help you adjust and deal with it.

Re: Skins vs the Crackboys

Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 10:00 pm
by por-tiz2skins
BeeGee wrote:
por-tiz2skins wrote:
forskins wrote:
por-tiz2skins wrote:Where becoming better on our O and the D is just injured,what has Dallas done?.They been healthy all year .


Oh Dallas has only led the NFC in Offense this year.

We haven't had Henry and Newman starting all year. Ellis didn't start unitl later in the season. We lost Ferguson in the first game.

Keep talkin...
And still scored 24 points and got very luck enough Moss droped the gme winning TD.Its ok cause if thats all the healthy cowboys got them your done the next meeting.
Actually, wasn't it YOU that predicted a victory today? Didn't you have Portis going for 600 yds and 3 tds or something like that? C'mon with the predictions, dude.

Lotta Skins fans act as if they're the only team that's dealt with injuries all season. Our defense has had plenty of adversity to deal with. Luckily, our offense has been good enough to put a lot of points on the board all year.

Hopefully, we have T Glenn and A Henry for the rematch at the Fed. No crying about injuries, man. Everybody has injuries... you have a huge roster to help you adjust and deal with it.
henry was playing and HA Glenn .........................I'm sorry but he would of never helped you guys had 4 TD's and you guys are not better than us im sorry.And yes we should of won today you lil flukie crappy team should be glad JC was never in does situations before and that the D was injured.And Portis could of ran 100 yards but we choose to trow and we killed that D but we refused to run on short downs.Cowboys are not great or even superbowl contenders and will show you that at Fed ex.(Spit)Cowboys got very lucky today and that wont happen the next meeting.

Re: Skins vs the Crackboys

Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 11:13 pm
by BeeGee
por-tiz2skins wrote:henry was playing and HA Glenn .........................I'm sorry but he would of never helped you guys had 4 TD's and you guys are not better than us im sorry.And yes we should of won today you lil flukie crappy team should be glad JC was never in does situations before and that the D was injured.And Portis could of ran 100 yards but we choose to trow and we killed that D but we refused to run on short downs.Cowboys are not great or even superbowl contenders and will show you that at Fed ex.(Spit)Cowboys got very lucky today and that wont happen the next meeting.
Henry has been hampered all season and Terry Glenn would be the best receiver on your team easily. So relax on all the exuses and the couldas. Portis COULD'VE run for 100 yards, but he wasn't facing the Jets or Eagles and got just 3yds per carry. And please with the injury excuse... the NFL season is a grind and everybody deals with injuries. Some teams flourish in spite, some teams just can't hack it, and some teams lose games that they could've won despite injuries, then some of their fans use the injuries as an excuse for their team not executing and finishing games.

Guess which one you are?

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 12:38 am
by forskins
Don't be so dang bitter. Campbell had a great game and my hat is off to him. Both QB'S had monster games and both secondaries got torched. Dallas' D played a bit less bad and won the game. Deadskins always play their heart out for Big D, and Dallas sometimes takes the win for granted. It almost happened this time....but it didn't. The division is the Cowboys for the taking. 8)

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 12:55 am
by welch
Beegee wrote
Guess which one you are?


BG, you've been a thoughtful contributor after a slightly rocky start. No reason to drag a mild form of smack into the serious forum.

This board welcomes -- enjoys -- serious contributions from fans of other teams. Keep going in the good direction.

Criticism of an individual poster, rather than disagreement with an opinion
almost always leads to verbal slop. No matter who started what, we can each stop a nonsense discussion. Just ignore it.

Personally, I think it was a good, well-fought game. Dallas seemed to have better players, but the Redskins certainly could have won it. Honors to both. We'll see about next time.

And...as I said earlier, the web is a high-contrast medium. A slight difference of emphasis can start bizarre conflicts. Usually, you can spot them when five opinions are telescoped into one. (Or when I lose my patience).

Consider this directed at everyone, potentially.

Re: Skins vs the Crackboys

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 1:42 am
by por-tiz2skins
BeeGee wrote:
por-tiz2skins wrote:henry was playing and HA Glenn .........................I'm sorry but he would of never helped you guys had 4 TD's and you guys are not better than us im sorry.And yes we should of won today you lil flukie crappy team should be glad JC was never in does situations before and that the D was injured.And Portis could of ran 100 yards but we choose to trow and we killed that D but we refused to run on short downs.Cowboys are not great or even superbowl contenders and will show you that at Fed ex.(Spit)Cowboys got very lucky today and that wont happen the next meeting.
Henry has been hampered all season and Terry Glenn would be the best receiver on your team easily. So relax on all the exuses and the couldas. Portis COULD'VE run for 100 yards, but he wasn't facing the Jets or Eagles and got just 3yds per carry. And please with the injury excuse... the NFL season is a grind and everybody deals with injuries. Some teams flourish in spite, some teams just can't hack it, and some teams lose games that they could've won despite injuries, then some of their fans use the injuries as an excuse for their team not executing and finishing games.

Guess which one you are?
Will now you know how we felt today.We didn't have our healthy D players either or hell Marcus Washington was limping and Griffin was probably out during 2nd Q.But you can't complain Henery was able to play and look who we ha at our secondry? 2 CB's that aren't that good and a late round worthless safety and a pratice squid CB.


Its ok this game showed us how good we can be.

Re: Skins vs the Crackboys

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 4:09 am
by BeeGee
por-tiz2skins wrote:Will now you know how we felt today.We didn't have our healthy D players either or hell Marcus Washington was limping and Griffin was probably out during 2nd Q.But you can't complain Henery was able to play and look who we ha at our secondry? 2 CB's that aren't that good and a late round worthless safety and a pratice squid CB.


Its ok this game showed us how good we can be.
That's my point though - I'm not complaining at all.

Bottom line is the Skins, despite the injuries, could be 2 or 3 games above .500 if they'd made some plays or not shot themselves in the foot. It still comes down to making plays and avoiding mistakes.

The Skins have been a tough out in all but one of those losses, and if there is one team that is a perfect example of the highlighted statement above, they're it.

It's cost you guys some losses and a few close calls, but you're right, the Skins found out some things yesterday.

- Keenan McCardell is the closest thing to a #1 receiver you have and Moss, even in a hampered state, is a very serviceable and dangerous #2. McCardell should not be taken off the field the rest of the season.
- The O-line has got it together, and have more/less had a good hold on happenings at the line of scrimmage the last 3 weeks. That being said, I have concerns about Samuels.
- Jason Campbell is for real. Given some time and some options to toss the pig to, this cat is dangerous. He got suckered by Newman late, but performance in the clutch will improve with experience. I think yesterday's game, even as a loss, was a benchmark game for #17.

I think the Skins simply need depth on the o/d lines, and a bonafide go-to receiver for their young QB. Accomplish that and this team will make noise for years.

Re: Skins vs the Crackboys

Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 2:27 am
by por-tiz2skins
BeeGee wrote:
por-tiz2skins wrote:Will now you know how we felt today.We didn't have our healthy D players either or hell Marcus Washington was limping and Griffin was probably out during 2nd Q.But you can't complain Henery was able to play and look who we ha at our secondry? 2 CB's that aren't that good and a late round worthless safety and a pratice squid CB.


Its ok this game showed us how good we can be.
That's my point though - I'm not complaining at all.

Bottom line is the Skins, despite the injuries, could be 2 or 3 games above .500 if they'd made some plays or not shot themselves in the foot. It still comes down to making plays and avoiding mistakes.

The Skins have been a tough out in all but one of those losses, and if there is one team that is a perfect example of the highlighted statement above, they're it.

It's cost you guys some losses and a few close calls, but you're right, the Skins found out some things yesterday.

- Keenan McCardell is the closest thing to a #1 receiver you have and Moss, even in a hampered state, is a very serviceable and dangerous #2. McCardell should not be taken off the field the rest of the season.
- The O-line has got it together, and have more/less had a good hold on happenings at the line of scrimmage the last 3 weeks. That being said, I have concerns about Samuels.
- Jason Campbell is for real. Given some time and some options to toss the pig to, this cat is dangerous. He got suckered by Newman late, but performance in the clutch will improve with experience. I think yesterday's game, even as a loss, was a benchmark game for #17.

I think the Skins simply need depth on the o/d lines, and a bonafide go-to receiver for their young QB. Accomplish that and this team will make noise for years.
U have a point.Even with Taylor we let does Jets get the best out of our D and the Eagles got us good in the half.I guess we don't have the CB's cause when we blitz we leave one good WR open for the first down.

Re: Skins vs the Crackboys

Posted: Thu Nov 22, 2007 7:32 am
by BeeGee
por-tiz2skins wrote: U have a point.Even with Taylor we let does Jets get the best out of our D and the Eagles got us good in the half.I guess we don't have the CB's cause when we blitz we leave one good WR open for the first down.
I think the Skins secondary is solid enough, without a doubt. It's just that wherever you find a successful secondary, you'll usually find a d-line that's getting to the passer. That's where the Skins are hurting. In their wins they have 14 or 15 sacks total and in their most dominant win, sacked Kitna 5 times. In their losses they might have half that many; only sacked Brady once and didn't really put any pressure on him whatsoever...and they didn't get pressure to sack Romo until that rally at the game's end.

Dline and Secondary go hand in hand and right now, the Dline is missing a few fingers. Williams has to use improvision to generate a more consistent pass rush because he doesn't have the luxury of big #21 back there.

Garcia gets antsy at the first sign of pressure, so I can see the Skins dline being effective this week. Still gotta be ready for the downfield shots to Galloway though. They seem to connect at least once per week regardless of opponent.