Page 3 of 4

Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2007 10:02 pm
by Irn-Bru
JSPB22 wrote: :shock:
Wow, you've really outdone yourself here.
Sentence 1: Hey Jason, take the LaVar Arrington/Brandon Lloyd approach to playing for Joe and see where that gets you!
Sentence 2: Keep doing what you are already doing, and pick up critical first downs to keep the chains moving. (2 scrambles for 31 yards and first downs Vs. the Jets)
Sentence 3: Disregard my last sentence completely. Also, stop fumbling away the ball on purpose. (3 fumbles lost Vs. the Patriots on sacks, 0 lost on sacks the rest of the season - his 1 other lost fumble this season was Vs. the G-strings on an exchange that Portis mishandled.)



ROTFALMAO


Nice work. . .

Re: Jason Campbell......

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 2:18 am
by RayNAustin
roybus14 wrote:Does Jason Campbell have the persona or personality to lead an NFL Team???

Jason Campbell was inserted into the starting line late last season, spent the entire off-season working on Al Saunders play book and his technique. We are eight games into the season and it appears that Jason Campbell's calm presence and demeanor may not be what is really needed for this football team.

Why would you say that Roy?? With this offense seriously struggling, one would think that the QB would show some fire and go after guys and coaches to get this offense going. It's like JC is just happy to be behind center and is just going with the flow.

A few things you don't see from this QB that you see in some of the better QBs around the league:

1. Taking the initiative and huddling with coaches and teammates on the sideline looking at snapshots at what worked, what didn't work, and what he thinks could work. Most of the time, they show JC on the sideline sitting quietly and it's normally one of the other offensive coaches approaching him with snapshots from the previous series. At least I have not seen him huddled with Moss, ARE, Cooley, etc. looking at snapshots or talking about what did or didn't work. Maybe season ticket holders on the board that have the vantage point of looking at the sideline more than the cameras can chime in.

2. Communicating with his WRs after missed routes or passes on the field. You see guys like Manning, Brady, Brees, Rivers, and even Clemons talking to and hand gesturing to their WRs on missed plays on the field.

3. No fire or emotion when we get a big play or a bad play. If the O-Line breaks down and he get's sacked or alot of pressure, you don't see him clapping his hands or trying to encourage his linemen to block better. After a big play, you don't see him getting excited and pumping guys up. It's normally the same thing after every play; look to the sideline for the play, and give the "come-in" gesture with his fingers for the guys to huddle up. The good QBs in this league are demanding of their offensive teammates. Brady was shown screaming at his lineman when we got the one sack on him and they were blowing us out.


It's not about how young this guy is and what not. He's been annointed the starting QB job so he needs to start showing something other than going through the motions. If he speaks up in practice and says to Al or Joe, "we need to start going down field more and this offense needs to open up." What are they going to do bench him for speaking his mind? During the game, take a chance and call an audible if you see something different in the defense or you know something will open up because the CB is playing too far back. What's wrong with working more with your WRs on little hand signals and gestures that are "hot reads" and changes their route from a curl to a quick slant? It's like JC is scared to step forward.

It's just my observation..... Your thoughts.......


I agree with you. There is a lack of fire, and emotional competitiveness from Campbell that shows up. He just seems to go through the motions very methodically, and doesn't seem to get excited. Look at Favre for example....been in the league since mosses parted the red sea, and he still runs down the field and celebrates a TD like it was his first one.

As for all of the excuse makers....some of these excuses are lame. If Moss was overly slowed down due to injury, how did he get wide open? LOOK....he was OPEN and he was overthrown..PERIOD. Why was it overthrown? Because Campbell's long balls are TOO FLAT. Hey, if Moss were Bob Hayes...maybe he could have run fast enough to catch it? How about putting a little air under the ball so you can run underneath and catch it? How about that?

The fact is, even when the deep balls connect, they are usually underthrown....that is why you don't see our wide receivers with TD's. They are RARELY hit in stride...either over or underthrown, frequently.

As for this timing thing....that is a load of bull, and nothing but excuse making. Romo started last year, right off the bench.....timing didn't seem to bother him. Brady has three new receivers and he's lighting up the NFL. Randy Moss did nothing with the Raiders because he didn't have anyone to throw to him, but now look what he's doing? Santana Moss was 2nd in the NFL in 2005 when that no account, weak armed Brunell was throwing to him. Remember the Dallas game.....two bombs, hit in-stride? When has Campbell done this? NEVER

Oh....the o-line is injured? Look at Romo scrambling for his life, game after game, and finding a way to MAKE PLAYS.

Who knows, Campbell may at some point be a good QB, but he ain't good right now. And the proof is in the results. And that is why we couldn't score a bloody touchdown against a poor jets defense when we were running the ball at will.

I don't buy this garbage about receivers not getting open either. On most plays, there is someone open. The great QB's find that open guy...or that small opening that the average or mediocre QB doesn't.

Does that mean that all of the offensive problems are Campbell's fault? No. We have a coaching issue that is all too obvious. We are way too predictable and conservative....playing not to lose, versus playing to win. That is on the coaches. Hey, if you have o-line issues, and can't pass protect.....you improvise. Quick slants....three step drops.....roll outs...you don't just keep doing the same thing, over and over again. You find something that works. After 3 1/2 seasons, you'd think this would not be such an issue, but it still is....just like the clock management issue is still there.

Let's stop all of the excuses for JC. Everybody sounds like Jason's mother here.

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 2:39 am
by RayNAustin
To add ,

This offense is in a coma, and has been since Gibbs returned. Even in 2005, it showed up in the playoffs. We barely beat TB, and we had no offense in Seatle.

The only reason we even made it to the playoffs is because the team got mad, and took matters into their own hands (Portis was the driving force). I don't see that kind of leadership coming from JC.

He sounds like Gibbs in post game interviews. Last week when they asked about that overthrown pass, he just smiled.

As for that humiliation in New England, that was a statement game, and it didn't say anything pretty. Yea yea, the Pats whupped up on everyone, but every one they whupped put up a lot more fight. That game looked like Brittany Spears fighting Mike Tyson. An embarassment. 52 to zip, with a junk TD at the end. Disgusting.

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 3:11 am
by CanesSkins26
As for this timing thing....that is a load of bull, and nothing but excuse making. Romo started last year, right off the bench.....timing didn't seem to bother him. Brady has three new receivers and he's lighting up the NFL. Randy Moss did nothing with the Raiders because he didn't have anyone to throw to him, but now look what he's doing? Santana Moss was 2nd in the NFL in 2005 when that no account, weak armed Brunell was throwing to him. Remember the Dallas game.....two bombs, hit in-stride? When has Campbell done this? NEVER


Off the top of my head....he did it with his first ever NFL pass. Only the ball went right through Brandon Lloyd's hands. He did it in the Packer's game only Moss dropped the ball. He also hit Thrash perfectly in the Cardinals game, but once again the ball was dropped.

Brady's receivers are HEALTHY. How hard is that to understand. Joe Gibbs said yesterday that they can't practice the deep ball to Moss in practice because of his INJURIES. So where exactly do you expect the timing to come from if the play isn't practiced? Tom Brady is also arguably one of the best qb's to ever play the game. So why are you comparing JC, who has made 15 total starts, to Tom Brady, who has won 3 Super Bowls. For once stop talking nonsense and look at some stats. You can ignore them all you want but JC's numbers through his first 15 games and comparable to Brady's first 15 games. Not to mention, Brady also has an amazing offensive line and has all day to sit in the pocket. But I'm sure that you don't consider the offensive line relevant passing game.

As for Romo, last season he has TO, Crayton, and Glenn to throw to. Do you really think that that's the same as throwing to Moss, ARE, and Thrash? I don't think so.[/b]

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 8:51 am
by HEROHAMO
JSPB22 wrote:
HEROHAMO wrote:What I want from Jason Campbell is to stop doing what he is told, and start doing what he feels he needs to do during a game. Start taking some chances and start scrambling when he sees pressure. Take a sack and dont cough the ball up.

:shock:
Wow, you've really outdone yourself here.
Sentence 1: Hey Jason, take the LaVar Arrington/Brandon Lloyd approach to playing for Joe and see where that gets you!
Sentence 2: Keep doing what you are already doing, and pick up critical first downs to keep the chains moving. (2 scrambles for 31 yards and first downs Vs. the Jets)
Sentence 3: Disregard my last sentence completely. Also, stop fumbling away the ball on purpose. (3 fumbles lost Vs. the Patriots on sacks, 0 lost on sacks the rest of the season - his 1 other lost fumble this season was Vs. the G-strings on an exchange that Portis mishandled.)


Every play does not pan out the way it was drawn up. In which case I want JC to make a decision quick and execute.

When JC scrambled for a first down, that is exactly what I want out of him.
I assure you the play that was called was not for him to scramble. When a play is busted I would like for him to either throw the ball away, take the sack if he has to, but protect the ball, or scramble if he has the lane.

He did do better in the Jets game , but he still did not throw any TDs and also threw an interception.

Yes, he is going through some of the growing pains as a Qb. It does not help that our Oline is still banged up as well. I just hope he breaks out soon. He is due for a monster game. Hopefully that is against our rivals.

Re: Jason Campbell......

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 9:46 am
by BnGhog
RayNAustin wrote: Remember the Dallas game.....two bombs, hit in-stride? When has Campbell done this? NEVER



Just to clarify. Those were not hit in-stride. They were both underthrown AND off target. But lobbed enough Moss came back to them and adjusted. Which is also the reason the defender could not make a play on the ball. The defender was running right with Moss. Moss saw the ball, and pretty much stopped dead in his tracks and changed his direction, leaving the defender in the dust.

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 9:53 am
by Deadskins
HEROHAMO wrote:
JSPB22 wrote:
HEROHAMO wrote:What I want from Jason Campbell is to stop doing what he is told, and start doing what he feels he needs to do during a game. Start taking some chances and start scrambling when he sees pressure. Take a sack and dont cough the ball up.

:shock:
Wow, you've really outdone yourself here.
Sentence 1: Hey Jason, take the LaVar Arrington/Brandon Lloyd approach to playing for Joe and see where that gets you!
Sentence 2: Keep doing what you are already doing, and pick up critical first downs to keep the chains moving. (2 scrambles for 31 yards and first downs Vs. the Jets)
Sentence 3: Disregard my last sentence completely. Also, stop fumbling away the ball on purpose. (3 fumbles lost Vs. the Patriots on sacks, 0 lost on sacks the rest of the season - his 1 other lost fumble this season was Vs. the G-strings on an exchange that Portis mishandled.)


Every play does not pan out the way it was drawn up. In which case I want JC to make a decision quick and execute.

See sentence 2 translation above.

HEROHAMO wrote:When JC scrambled for a first down, that is exactly what I want out of him.
I assure you the play that was called was not for him to scramble.

See sentence 2 translation above.

HEROHAMO wrote:When a play is busted I would like for him to either throw the ball away

So continue to make smart decisions by playing Joe Gibbs' football? Completely disregard sentence 1 translation above.

HEROHAMO wrote:take the sack if he has to, but protect the ball

See sentence 3 translation above.

HEROHAMO wrote:or scramble if he has the lane.

See sentence 2 translation above.

HEROHAMO wrote:He did do better in the Jets game , but he still did not throw any TDs and also threw an interception.

He threw at least two passes that would have been TDs, had they been caught (In the endzone to Thrash, Moss in OT). He was hit as he threw the ball on the INT.

HEROHAMO wrote:Yes, he is going through some of the growing pains as a Qb. It does not help that our Oline is still banged up as well. I just hope he breaks out soon. He is due for a monster game. Hopefully that is against our rivals.

He was NFC Offensive Player of the week after the Detroit game, but I agree that I hope he has a repeat performance over the next two weeks.

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 10:10 am
by roybus14
Ray,

I see your points and they are definitely valid.

But on the really-real tho, it all comes full circle back to coaching.

As a matter of fact, it's has inspired another thread.......

Check-it in a few.....

Re: JC's Timing with Moss on deep passes

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 10:43 am
by KazooSkinsFan
CanesSkins26 wrote:Maybe this doesn't deserve it's own thread (that's up the mods) but there have been a lot of posts lately complaining about JC's alleged problems with the deep pass so I figured this would somewhat clear that up. The two glaring misses have been overthrows to Moss. Well Gibbs said today on his radio show, in response to a question about JC's timing with Moss, that because of the leg injuries that Moss had in pre-season and during the season, they are not really able to practice deep routes with him at full speed during practice. So if they can't practice these routes in practice, and only call them in games every weeks games, there is no way that Moss and JC are going to have the type of timing necessary to complete these passes with any sort of consistency.


I think he's done better with deep throws then he's gotten credit for lately, but he does need to learn to put more loft on it. The flat deep passes are very hard to hit with any consistency.

But I'd far rather have a QB who has the arm and pretty good accuracy for a young QB and needs to tune the throw then the other way around. You can't teach a kid to have an arm. You can teach him how to use it. I hope no one brings up Jay Shroeder. Oops, did I say that out loud?

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 10:45 am
by KazooSkinsFan
HEROHAMO wrote:What I want from Jason Campbell is to stop doing what he is told, and start doing what he feels he needs to do during a game. Start taking some chances and start scrambling when he sees pressure. Take a sack and dont cough the ball up.


I have a hard time believing he's not being told to read and react, not just follow the script.

Re: Jason Campbell......

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 11:40 am
by RayNAustin
BnGhog wrote:
RayNAustin wrote: Remember the Dallas game.....two bombs, hit in-stride? When has Campbell done this? NEVER



Just to clarify. Those were not hit in-stride. They were both underthrown AND off target. But lobbed enough Moss came back to them and adjusted. Which is also the reason the defender could not make a play on the ball. The defender was running right with Moss. Moss saw the ball, and pretty much stopped dead in his tracks and changed his direction, leaving the defender in the dust.


Maybe you just want to argue something...but this is absolutely untrue. I was there, at the game. I've seen the replays dozens of times. Moss caught both balls in-stride, and went in for the scores standing up, untouched. Since you are obviously unaware of this, let me clarify for you that it is comon practice to lead a reciever (either inside or outside (depending on the position of the defender) and not to throw the ball in a direct line over the receiver's head, forcing him to make the catch with his back to the ball (hardest catch to make) while also requiring a perfect pass that allows no adjustment. GET IT?

Re: Jason Campbell......

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 11:48 am
by BnGhog
RayNAustin wrote:
BnGhog wrote:
RayNAustin wrote: Remember the Dallas game.....two bombs, hit in-stride? When has Campbell done this? NEVER



Just to clarify. Those were not hit in-stride. They were both underthrown AND off target. But lobbed enough Moss came back to them and adjusted. Which is also the reason the defender could not make a play on the ball. The defender was running right with Moss. Moss saw the ball, and pretty much stopped dead in his tracks and changed his direction, leaving the defender in the dust.


Maybe you just want to argue something...but this is absolutely untrue. I was there, at the game. I've seen the replays dozens of times. Moss caught both balls in-stride, and went in for the scores standing up, untouched. Since you are obviously unaware of this, let me clarify for you that it is comon practice to lead a reciever (either inside or outside (depending on the position of the defender) and not to throw the ball in a direct line over the receiver's head, forcing him to make the catch with his back to the ball (hardest catch to make) while also requiring a perfect pass that allows no adjustment. GET IT?



Ohhh. Glad to see you saw the replays. I was unaware that they LEAD a RW buy the makeing the WR have to pretty much stop(he didn't stop but almost had do) and turn left to make the catch. Of course he did slow and make a left turn then went in to the enzone untouched. I guess all the other times when you see a WR with right in front of the defender deep they have been wrong to throw it over their shoulder with out having to make much adjustment. Maybe you should watch the replay again.

Re: Jason Campbell......

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 11:50 am
by Deadskins
RayNAustin wrote:
BnGhog wrote:
RayNAustin wrote: Remember the Dallas game.....two bombs, hit in-stride? When has Campbell done this? NEVER



Just to clarify. Those were not hit in-stride. They were both underthrown AND off target. But lobbed enough Moss came back to them and adjusted. Which is also the reason the defender could not make a play on the ball. The defender was running right with Moss. Moss saw the ball, and pretty much stopped dead in his tracks and changed his direction, leaving the defender in the dust.


Maybe you just want to argue something...but this is absolutely untrue. I was there, at the game. I've seen the replays dozens of times. Moss caught both balls in-stride, and went in for the scores standing up, untouched. Since you are obviously unaware of this, let me clarify for you that it is comon practice to lead a reciever (either inside or outside (depending on the position of the defender) and not to throw the ball in a direct line over the receiver's head, forcing him to make the catch with his back to the ball (hardest catch to make) while also requiring a perfect pass that allows no adjustment. GET IT?

Well actually, you're both wrong. The first catch was in the endzone, and he sort of slid, like a baseball slide, while making the catch. The second was in stride, but he had to adjust his route, and he ran the last 30 yards into the endzone and into Chief Zee's arms.

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 11:54 am
by langleyparkjoe
ahh yes.. us crapping all over the cowpunks.. speak on it!!! lol
\:D/

GO SKINS !!! KILL DA EAGLES !!!

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 12:01 pm
by GSPODS
Looks more like us crapping all over each other just to argue who's right or wrong about what happened in the past.
Who cares?

My 2 cents

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 12:15 pm
by BnGhog
GSPODS wrote:Looks more like us crapping all over each other just to argue who's right or wrong about what happened in the past.
Who cares?

My 2 cents


Yep! Its fun. Hell yeah! I have to retract my statement. I must have been remembering a different game. The first one was in the endzone and he lead him directly to the safty. Luckily Roy wasn't looking at the ball. SWEET TD!! I forgot how sweet those deep TD were! He did hit him in stride on the second TD. I watched them in the SWEET highlight thread our simi-cool mediators put in place,( thx :up: ). The second TD was even more SWEETtastic.

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 12:21 pm
by langleyparkjoe
Hey BnGHog.. we forgot what TDs to WR's are in general!!!

;furious;

GO SKINS !!! KILL DA EAGLES !!!

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 1:50 pm
by RayNAustin
CanesSkins26 wrote:
As for this timing thing....that is a load of bull, and nothing but excuse making. Romo started last year, right off the bench.....timing didn't seem to bother him. Brady has three new receivers and he's lighting up the NFL. Randy Moss did nothing with the Raiders because he didn't have anyone to throw to him, but now look what he's doing? Santana Moss was 2nd in the NFL in 2005 when that no account, weak armed Brunell was throwing to him. Remember the Dallas game.....two bombs, hit in-stride? When has Campbell done this? NEVER


Off the top of my head....he did it with his first ever NFL pass. Only the ball went right through Brandon Lloyd's hands. He did it in the Packer's game only Moss dropped the ball. He also hit Thrash perfectly in the Cardinals game, but once again the ball was dropped.

Brady's receivers are HEALTHY. How hard is that to understand. Joe Gibbs said yesterday that they can't practice the deep ball to Moss in practice because of his INJURIES. So where exactly do you expect the timing to come from if the play isn't practiced? Tom Brady is also arguably one of the best qb's to ever play the game. So why are you comparing JC, who has made 15 total starts, to Tom Brady, who has won 3 Super Bowls. For once stop talking nonsense and look at some stats. You can ignore them all you want but JC's numbers through his first 15 games and comparable to Brady's first 15 games. Not to mention, Brady also has an amazing offensive line and has all day to sit in the pocket. But I'm sure that you don't consider the offensive line relevant passing game.

As for Romo, last season he has TO, Crayton, and Glenn to throw to. Do you really think that that's the same as throwing to Moss, ARE, and Thrash? I don't think so.[/b]


This year Romo is doing better and Glenn is hurt (ZERO catches). You think TO doesn't drop passes? He is renown for dropped balls. I'll take Santana over Terry Glenn, and ARE over Crayton any day. And I'll put Cooly up against Witten all day long. Last year Witten had a grand total of 1 TD, while Cooly had 6. Their yards per game, and number of catches were comparable.....last year. Both Moss and Cooly were ahead of Glenn, Crayton, Witten and TO (philly) in 2005. What has changed? Dallas changed QB's in 2006 and so did the Redskins.

As for comparing Moss to TO...TO is a bigger, stronger receiver. But Santana is clearly an elite receiver as his numbers in 2005 clearly showed. Santana's numbers dropped significantly in 2006 because everyone game planned around him, and we had no 2nd tier threat....or perhaps because he had a rookie QB for the second half of the season??

As for the o-line issues....let's put this to bed right now. Wanna talk sacks? Campbell has been sacked 13 times this year so far (6 TD's). Roethlisberger 19 times (20 TD's) Romo 11 times (19 TD's) (and escapes at least a sack or 2 a game with mobility and scrambling) Hasselbeck 15 times (13 TD's) Get this....Kitna 33 SACKS (10 TD's) Derek Anderson (ROOKIE) 8 (17 TD's) Brian Greise....BRIAN BLOODY GREISE 12 sacks (9 TD's) want some more??

OK. There is only 1 QB in the entire NFL (QB's with 200 atts or more) with a lower QB rating than Jason Campbell....just ONE!! That is not perfectly fine. That is perfectly pitiful considering the talent on this team....great RB's, excellent TE, good Receivers. We are 3rd in the NFC in run offense, 13th in passing. Considering it takes an o-line to run the ball, and considering we don't have any out of the ordinary sack numbers, there is one common denominator here....the guy who PASSES the freaking ball.

How hard is this for you to understand?

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 3:06 pm
by langleyparkjoe
Hey Ray, now that's a helluva breakdown.. I didn't even know all that!! but what you expect when our HC wants to play "Redskins Football" which to me was over when he left the first time around. Just my opinion but I still think we don't throw enough to give JC the chances to get those touchdowns up. He does need to hold on to the ball better or throw it away quicker once he gets out of the box. Yet, those are "rookie" mistakes I hope we won't see next year.

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 4:36 pm
by roybus14
Well, Ray just put it all into perspective with those stats....

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 8:07 pm
by RayNAustin
Hey guys, I'm an old fart....and a longtime Redskin fan. My first game at the NEW RFK Stadium (when the skins moved from old Griffith Stadium) was in the early 1960's....when Sony was throwing to Charlie Taylor. So I know a thing or two about a thing or two.

Jason Campbell might well become a fabulous QB......only time will tell. John Elway's numbers early on were pretty pathetic, and Terry Bradshall was almost run out of Pittsburgh. There are several such stories. But right now, JC is not performing at a level necessary for the Redskins to be legitimate contenders given the level of our competition....namely Romo and the Cowgirls, nor Manning and the G-men.

Are these just growing pains that we have to live with in a young QB, or is this a sign of misplaced optimism and another failure of the front office in talent evaluation? Your guess is as good as mine....as none of us possess a crystal ball.

My only point was that JC shows no more tangible progress than did Gus Ferrotte or Patrick Ramsey, insofar as results are concerned. And that is the only measure you can measure. Potential? Where have we heard about potential. Westbrook was supposed to be the second coming. Desmond Howard was too, and Heath Shuler.....

You can spit in one hand and grab potential with the other and see which fils up the fastest. I'd be a Potential Millionaire if I were not so broke.

I'm just being brutally honest. Campbell needs to step up, and start making some plays. And the coaches need to turn him loose, and let the chips fall where they may. If he aint up to the challenge, put someone else in there.

As George Allen would say, the future is NOW.

Re: Jason Campbell......

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 8:18 pm
by RayNAustin
JSPB22 wrote:
RayNAustin wrote:
BnGhog wrote:
RayNAustin wrote: Remember the Dallas game.....two bombs, hit in-stride? When has Campbell done this? NEVER



Just to clarify. Those were not hit in-stride. They were both underthrown AND off target. But lobbed enough Moss came back to them and adjusted. Which is also the reason the defender could not make a play on the ball. The defender was running right with Moss. Moss saw the ball, and pretty much stopped dead in his tracks and changed his direction, leaving the defender in the dust.


Maybe you just want to argue something...but this is absolutely untrue. I was there, at the game. I've seen the replays dozens of times. Moss caught both balls in-stride, and went in for the scores standing up, untouched. Since you are obviously unaware of this, let me clarify for you that it is comon practice to lead a reciever (either inside or outside (depending on the position of the defender) and not to throw the ball in a direct line over the receiver's head, forcing him to make the catch with his back to the ball (hardest catch to make) while also requiring a perfect pass that allows no adjustment. GET IT?

Well actually, you're both wrong. The first catch was in the endzone, and he sort of slid, like a baseball slide, while making the catch. The second was in stride, but he had to adjust his route, and he ran the last 30 yards into the endzone and into Chief Zee's arms.


No. Watch the replays. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O6mKM8U3Jqs

He caught the first ball in the endzone running at full stride, and the ball was right there on the money and he fell. Brunell led him perfectly. The second one he caught in stride at the 21 yard line and ran it in.

Roll the tape...and quit with the faulty memory crap. I was there, sitting in the endzone at Texas Stadium.

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 8:32 pm
by CanesSkins26
RayNAustin wrote:
CanesSkins26 wrote:
As for this timing thing....that is a load of bull, and nothing but excuse making. Romo started last year, right off the bench.....timing didn't seem to bother him. Brady has three new receivers and he's lighting up the NFL. Randy Moss did nothing with the Raiders because he didn't have anyone to throw to him, but now look what he's doing? Santana Moss was 2nd in the NFL in 2005 when that no account, weak armed Brunell was throwing to him. Remember the Dallas game.....two bombs, hit in-stride? When has Campbell done this? NEVER


Off the top of my head....he did it with his first ever NFL pass. Only the ball went right through Brandon Lloyd's hands. He did it in the Packer's game only Moss dropped the ball. He also hit Thrash perfectly in the Cardinals game, but once again the ball was dropped.

Brady's receivers are HEALTHY. How hard is that to understand. Joe Gibbs said yesterday that they can't practice the deep ball to Moss in practice because of his INJURIES. So where exactly do you expect the timing to come from if the play isn't practiced? Tom Brady is also arguably one of the best qb's to ever play the game. So why are you comparing JC, who has made 15 total starts, to Tom Brady, who has won 3 Super Bowls. For once stop talking nonsense and look at some stats. You can ignore them all you want but JC's numbers through his first 15 games and comparable to Brady's first 15 games. Not to mention, Brady also has an amazing offensive line and has all day to sit in the pocket. But I'm sure that you don't consider the offensive line relevant passing game.

As for Romo, last season he has TO, Crayton, and Glenn to throw to. Do you really think that that's the same as throwing to Moss, ARE, and Thrash? I don't think so.[/b]


This year Romo is doing better and Glenn is hurt (ZERO catches). You think TO doesn't drop passes? He is renown for dropped balls. I'll take Santana over Terry Glenn, and ARE over Crayton any day. And I'll put Cooly up against Witten all day long. Last year Witten had a grand total of 1 TD, while Cooly had 6. Their yards per game, and number of catches were comparable.....last year. Both Moss and Cooly were ahead of Glenn, Crayton, Witten and TO (philly) in 2005. What has changed? Dallas changed QB's in 2006 and so did the Redskins.

As for comparing Moss to TO...TO is a bigger, stronger receiver. But Santana is clearly an elite receiver as his numbers in 2005 clearly showed. Santana's numbers dropped significantly in 2006 because everyone game planned around him, and we had no 2nd tier threat....or perhaps because he had a rookie QB for the second half of the season??

As for the o-line issues....let's put this to bed right now. Wanna talk sacks? Campbell has been sacked 13 times this year so far (6 TD's). Roethlisberger 19 times (20 TD's) Romo 11 times (19 TD's) (and escapes at least a sack or 2 a game with mobility and scrambling) Hasselbeck 15 times (13 TD's) Get this....Kitna 33 SACKS (10 TD's) Derek Anderson (ROOKIE) 8 (17 TD's) Brian Greise....BRIAN BLOODY GREISE 12 sacks (9 TD's) want some more??

OK. There is only 1 QB in the entire NFL (QB's with 200 atts or more) with a lower QB rating than Jason Campbell....just ONE!! That is not perfectly fine. That is perfectly pitiful considering the talent on this team....great RB's, excellent TE, good Receivers. We are 3rd in the NFC in run offense, 13th in passing. Considering it takes an o-line to run the ball, and considering we don't have any out of the ordinary sack numbers, there is one common denominator here....the guy who PASSES the freaking ball.

How hard is this for you to understand?


You actually believe, that with Fabini and Wade starting (and with Pucillo having started a game) that our oline is as good as the Dallas and Pittsburgh olines? Seriously. Our line is playing so much worse than it did last year and if you can't see that then there is no point if even arguing with you because you are clueless. You want to talk about sacks, lets talk about sacks. Last season, in 7 games and 207 attempts, JC took 7 sacks. This season, in 8 games and 227 pass attempts, JC has already been sacked 13 times, almost double last year's total. Do you really not see that he is under much more pressure this season than last season? Go look at the rushing stats from the 7 games that JC started last season and compare them to the rushing stats from this season and then try and tell me that the oline isn't a problem. Everyone, from JC, Gibbs, Bugel, Wade, CP....the list goes on and on, has mentioned that the oline is having problems.

Those td numbers from those other teams are also misleading. The coaches of the Cowboys, Steelers, Lions, etc. all allow their qb's to throw the ball down field. Those teams routinely go 3 wide, and sometimes even 4 wide. Our team, on the other hand, goes 2 wide, rarely 3 wide, and almost never 4 wide. If we went 3 wide and threw downfield more, I have no doubt that JC would have more td's.

Moss is not TO. Sorry to break it to you. Moss is a very good receiver, but TO is an elite player. Throw in injuries to his groin and heal, and Moss is definitely not in the same class as TO. As for your Crayton/Randle El comparison, they are close in talent, but Crayton is their #3 receiver and will be back in that position when Glenn comes back. And we have James Thrash and his 3 catches as our number 3.

As for your qb rating numbers, those are straight up misleading. What makes 200 attempts the cutoff point. There are plenty of starters in the NFL with under 200 attempts. Trent Green, Culpepper, Garrard, Warner, Vince Young. Looking at all the stats, JC is 25th out of 34 qb's. Obviously that's not that great, but once again for a qb only starting 15 games, it's that bad either. Another thing that you conviniently left us is that of the 24 qb's with higher passer ratings than JC, 23 of them have more NFL playing experience than he does. He is young. He'll get better.

I'm also going to pose this question to you.....you harp about the problems with JC and the passing game, but how exactly do you expect it to get better when JC can't even practice with his top receivers? As an example, Moss didn't practice yesterday or today. Randle El sat out practice today. Do expect the passing game to magically improve when the starters aren't even practicing with JC?

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 8:57 pm
by Fios
Look, he's had 15 games, if Jason Campbell does not win the MVP this year, it's obviously time to cut our losses.

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 10:19 pm
by RayNAustin
CanesSkins26 wrote:You actually believe, that with Fabini and Wade starting (and with Pucillo having started a game) that our oline is as good as the Dallas and Pittsburgh olines? Seriously. Our line is playing so much worse than it did last year and if you can't see that then there is no point if even arguing with you because you are clueless. You want to talk about sacks, lets talk about sacks. Last season, in 7 games and 207 attempts, JC took 7 sacks. This season, in 8 games and 227 pass attempts, JC has already been sacked 13 times, almost double last year's old. Do you really not see that he is under much more pressure this season than last season? Go look at the rushing stats from the 7 games that JC started last season and compare them to the rushing stats from this season and then try and tell me that the oline isn't a problem. Everyone, from JC, Gibbs, Bugel, Wade, CP....the list goes on and on, has mentioned that the oline is having problems.


Me clueless? Look Mr. Cinder Block head, nobody said we didn't have o-line injuries. I just said it was an excuse. And when it comes to pressure, are you saying that Roethlisberger being sacked 19 times while throwing 20 TD's means that he is under LESS pressure than Campbell who has been sacked only 13 times? Explain your logic behind that brilliant analysis. The point is, 13 sacks is a fairly average number across the league, with Kitna being sacked 33 times. As for rushing and it's OBVIOUS effects on passing, the Green Freaking Bay Packers are LAST in the NFL in rushing, and 2nd in passing. Apparently, their terrible o-linemen aren't asked to throw the football like ours apparently are.

CanesSkins26 wrote:Those td numbers from those other teams are also misleading. The coaches of the Cowboys, Steelers, Lions, etc. all allow their qb's to throw the ball down field. Those teams routinely go 3 wide, and sometimes even 4 wide. Our team, on the other hand, goes 2 wide, rarely 3 wide, and almost never 4 wide. If we went 3 wide and threw downfield more, I have no doubt that JC would have more td's.


So you are saying what? The Redskin coaches don't want to score more points? Ahh, that's the ticket, they really don't want to score more points. Well, in that case, maybe you are right. Maybe......somebody just needs to ALLOW JC to score more TD's.


Moss is not TO. Sorry to break it to you. Moss is a very good receiver, but TO is an elite player. Throw in injuries to his groin and heal, and Moss is definitely not in the same class as TO. As for your Crayton/Randle El comparison, they are close in talent, but Crayton is their #3 receiver and will be back in that position when Glenn comes back. And we have James Thrash and his 3 catches as our number 3.


In 2005, TO was no Moss. Not even close. But then again, if if's and buts were whores and sluts we'd all be smiling broadly. When Glenn comes back.....blah blah blah.....what does that have to do with what is happening now? Romo is doing fine WITHOUT Glenn. Apparently he is not as dependent on a particular player as is JC.

As for your qb rating numbers, those are straight up misleading. What makes 200 attempts the cutoff point. There are plenty of starters in the NFL with under 200 attempts. Trent Green, Culpepper, Garrard, Warner, Vince Young. Looking at all the stats, JC is 25th out of 34 qb's. Obviously that's not that great, but once again for a qb only starting 15 games, it's that bad either. Another thing that you conviniently left us is that of the 24 qb's with higher passer ratings than JC, 23 of them have more NFL playing experience than he does. He is young. He'll get better.


The only thing that is misleading here is your twisted logic and what ifs and excuses. The reason I picked 200 attempts is becuse most of the QB's currently playing in all games this year have 200 attempts. Most under that number are either injured or have already been BENCHED and replaced.

I'm also going to pose this question to you.....you harp about the problems with JC and the passing game, but how exactly do you expect it to get better when JC can't even practice with his top receivers? As an example, Moss didn't practice yesterday or today. Randle El sat out practice today. Do expect the passing game to magically improve when the starters aren't even practicing with JC?



My God man, do you hear yourself? Whine, whine, whine. Did they forget how to play football with each other this year? They can't remember each other from last year? Gosh coach, I don't think I can throw this Sunday cuz me and Santana haven't had a chance to play catch this week?

NEWS FLASH= Vinny Testaverde (43 years old) returns from retirement and throws a 65 yard TD to Steve Smith in his first game as a Panther.

Romo came in for the Cowboys last year, and immediately began connecting with his receivers.....

Brady had Moss, Stalworth, and Welker come in new this year, replacing all of last years receivers, and they've just gotten better, scoring at will from day 1. Oh yes, that's right, Tom Brady doesn't need practice with his receivers....they don't need to work on timing and all of that nonsense...they just play football, because they are football players.