Page 3 of 3
Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2007 3:22 pm
by GSPODS
BnGhog wrote:1niksder wrote:Where's TRO

Thats the second time I've seen that statement and I still don't know who or what the heck TRO is.
Perhaps that is the Unredeemed One?
Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2007 3:39 pm
by BnGhog
GSPODS wrote:BnGhog wrote:1niksder wrote:Where's TRO

Thats the second time I've seen that statement and I still don't know who or what the heck TRO is.
Perhaps that is the Unredeemed One?
Perhaps, but how do you get T R O out of Redeemed?
Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2007 3:42 pm
by GSPODS
BnGhog wrote:GSPODS wrote:BnGhog wrote:1niksder wrote:Where's TRO

Thats the second time I've seen that statement and I still don't know who or what the heck TRO is.
Perhaps that is the Unredeemed One?
Perhaps, but how do you get T R O out of Redeemed?
The Redeemed One
Only if I have any clue what I'm talking abut here.
Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2007 4:00 pm
by BnGhog
Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2007 4:02 pm
by GSPODS
I don't even know if I have the first clue what I'm talking about.
I'm only guessing by process of elimination.
Soon I may be banging my head against the closest wall when I find out how wrong I am.
Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2007 6:23 pm
by Deadskins
RedeemedSkin calls himself TRO (The Redeemed One), and is an unabashedly Mark Brunell lover.
Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2007 6:57 pm
by CanesSkins26
JSPB22 wrote:RedeemedSkin calls himself TRO (The Redeemed One), and is an unabashedly Mark Brunell lover.
I'm still not 100% convinced that Redeemed isn't actually Mark Brunell.
Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2007 10:09 pm
by PulpExposure
Paralis wrote:PulpExposure wrote:But maybe I'm just uneducated. Teach me. With facts.
Ben Roethlisberger? 2004? I mean, come on. It's not ancient history.
And Dan Marino. But you could argue Big Ben's success was because they relied on the running game and only asked him to throw about 6 passes a game.
But besides Ben and Marino, who else? Everyone else has struggled as a rookie QB.
Besides, it's not like the success or failure of teams starting rookie quarterbacks has that much to do with the QBs themselves. It's that teams starting rookie quarterbacks are nearly always bad teams. The 1998 Colts didn't go 3-13 because they started Peyton Manning on day 1; they went 3-13 because they were one of the worst teams in football the year before and their defense didn't improve.
That's true, but you don't think Manning throwing 28 ints contributed to that somewhat?
Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2007 10:35 pm
by CanesSkins26
But besides Ben and Marino, who else? Everyone else has struggled as a rookie QB.
A quick search revealed...
Vince Young did well as a rookie. Culpepper had a huge year in his first year as a starter (his second NFL season). Carson Palmer was solid in his first action (2nd year). Mark Bulger had a qb rating of 101.5 in his rookie season. McNabb had some problems in his rookie season (started half the games) but did well in his second year in the league. Brady was very effective in his first game action (second NFL season). These are just the names that I came up with in a 5 minute search. Young qb's are much more prepared for the NFL these days with more college teams running pro style offenses.
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 3:08 am
by Deadskins
CanesSkins26 wrote:But besides Ben and Marino, who else? Everyone else has struggled as a rookie QB.
A quick search revealed...
Vince Young did well as a rookie. Culpepper had a huge year in his first year as a starter (his second NFL season). Carson Palmer was solid in his first action (2nd year). Mark Bulger had a qb rating of 101.5 in his rookie season. McNabb had some problems in his rookie season (started half the games) but did well in his second year in the league. Brady was very effective in his first game action (second NFL season). These are just the names that I came up with in a 5 minute search. Young qb's are much more prepared for the NFL these days with more college teams running pro style offenses.
2nd year players are not rookies.
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 9:01 am
by jmooney
The system was in so much turmoil here, that it could have been detrimental to his development. Not saying theres a ton of stability now but, its a better situation. Im not sure that Al Saunders offense lends itself to QB development as there has always been a vetran running his system(Trent Green , Kurt Warner ect.) . That being said, Jason is doing a fine job of managing these games for us, to this point it hasnt been his play or lack thereof that has contributed to our 2 losses. His shortcomings were very appearant last year and he has worked hard to overcome those. Until the rest of the offense steps up, we wont get to see a display of the true talent he is. Lets just hope he can survive thru the injuries to the O-line for that to happen.
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 9:03 am
by jmooney
He simply isnt far enough along yet to make up for other peoples mistakes, but he does make up for his own rather nicely.
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 12:54 pm
by Deadskins
jmooney wrote:That being said, Jason is doing a fine job of managing these games for us, to this point it hasnt been his play or lack thereof that has contributed to our 2 losses.
I think he's played exceptionally well for how much playing time he has gotten so far in his career, but he has overthrown a couple of balls that would have won us those two games.
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 1:03 pm
by PulpExposure
CanesSkins26 wrote:But besides Ben and Marino, who else? Everyone else has struggled as a rookie QB.
A quick search revealed...
Vince Young did well as a rookie.
12 TDs and 13 INTs, 51.5% completion is doing well?
Culpepper had a huge year in his first year as a starter (his second NFL season).
Not a rookie.
Carson Palmer was solid in his first action (2nd year).
Not a rookie.
Mark Bulger had a qb rating of 101.5 in his rookie season.
You just looked at pro-football-reference.com. If you had
known a little more, you'd have realized he didn't play as a rookie in 2001.
Drafted by the Saints in the 2000 NFL draft.
Not a rookie.
He started McNabb had some problems in his rookie season (started half the games) but did well in his second year in the league. Brady was very effective in his first game action (second NFL season). [/uqote]
Not rookies.
These are just the names that I came up with in a 5 minute search.
You need to do a better job of searching within the indicated parameters.
Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2007 3:08 pm
by CanesSkins26
12 TDs and 13 INTs, 51.5% completion is doing well?
Actually he scored 19 td's that season. Rushing stats do count. He also went 8-5 as a starter and basically turned that team around single handedly. He also won the NFL's Rookie of the year award. So yea I think that he did very well.
I used the other examples to show that young qb's (all started in their first or second full seasons) could do well in the NFL.
But if you want more rookies that did well here you go...
Jay Cutler - 9 td's, 5 int's, 59.1% completion
Shaun King - Reached the NFC Championship game as a rookie; 7 td's. 4 int's, 82.4 qb rating, 61% completion
Tim Couch - His rookie year was probably his best. 16 td's, 14 turnovers, 2447 yards
Charlier Batch - 11 td's, 6 int's, 83.5 qb rating
Obviously rookie qb's having an impact is rare, but Big Ben and Marino are not the only ones that have done it.