Page 3 of 3

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 10:49 am
by (d)oink
Sign Lavar for 4 years, he will play 4 games.

Sign Lavar for 2 years, he will play 2 games.

etc.

He is broken.

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 11:04 am
by Fios
PulpExposure wrote:
Chris Luva Luva wrote:Clark and Arrington worked out well for BOTH teams they went to. The ONLY reason they're being cut is because of injury and thats a fact.


Are you kidding me? I have a friend who lives in NYC who kept forwarding me articles in the NY press about how Arrington was slow to pick up the defense and was in serious jeopardy of losing his starting position even before the injury.

You want some proof of his just awful play?

Arrington in 6 games had 16 tackles and 1 sack. If you want to take out the game he got injured early in, that means 14 tackles (and no sacks) in 5 games.

That's production that Warrick Holdman would have been proud of.

He was cut because he wasn't performing.


I have friends who are Giants fans who echoed that sentiment, they considered him a waste of money very early in the season.

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 12:01 pm
by KazooSkinsFan
Fios wrote:
PulpExposure wrote:
Chris Luva Luva wrote:Clark and Arrington worked out well for BOTH teams they went to. The ONLY reason they're being cut is because of injury and thats a fact.


Are you kidding me? I have a friend who lives in NYC who kept forwarding me articles in the NY press about how Arrington was slow to pick up the defense and was in serious jeopardy of losing his starting position even before the injury.

You want some proof of his just awful play?

Arrington in 6 games had 16 tackles and 1 sack. If you want to take out the game he got injured early in, that means 14 tackles (and no sacks) in 5 games.

That's production that Warrick Holdman would have been proud of.

He was cut because he wasn't performing.


I have friends who are Giants fans who echoed that sentiment, they considered him a waste of money very early in the season.


I live in Connecticut, NY suburbs, and hear nothing positive about him. His being cut was barely news.

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 12:37 pm
by Californiaskin
I'm not messing with any Pink Flexi Straws but...........I dont really think we need to re sign Lavar but what we do need is someone who can bring some intensty and fire into the defense, and that person in the past had been Lavar, and the team missed that spark last year. I heard Ricky Williams wired during our game a couple of years ago against Miami and instead of hearing Ricky talking and whatnot I heard more smack from Arrington and Trotter saying things like after a hit "All day long Ricky" and "bring it Ricky". Our D had zero intensity last year and I think a large part of that was due to the fact that we did not replace Lavars presense in that regard. Now weather or not we should resign him I'd probably say no cuz he is so broken now. We need to search for a Defensive leader like Lavar was in his best days here.

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 12:52 pm
by joebagadonuts
Californiaskin wrote:I'm not messing with any Pink Flexi Straws but...........I dont really think we need to re sign Lavar but what we do need is someone who can bring some intensty and fire into the defense, and that person in the past had been Lavar, and the team missed that spark last year. I heard Ricky Williams wired during our game a couple of years ago against Miami and instead of hearing Ricky talking and whatnot I heard more smack from Arrington and Trotter saying things like after a hit "All day long Ricky" and "bring it Ricky". Our D had zero intensity last year and I think a large part of that was due to the fact that we did not replace Lavars presense in that regard. Now weather or not we should resign him I'd probably say no cuz he is so broken now. We need to search for a Defensive leader like Lavar was in his best days here.


That's the thing though - I don't think Arrington was a leader his last year or or two. I think he was a distraction. If you're looking for leaders (in addition to guys like Washington, Griffin, Springs, etc.) then we should look internally. At this stage in his career, from what I've seen, I'm not sure Arrington is capable of being a leader anywhere.

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 1:43 pm
by Fios
Californiaskin wrote:I'm not messing with any Pink Flexi Straws but...........I dont really think we need to re sign Lavar but what we do need is someone who can bring some intensty and fire into the defense, and that person in the past had been Lavar, and the team missed that spark last year. I heard Ricky Williams wired during our game a couple of years ago against Miami and instead of hearing Ricky talking and whatnot I heard more smack from Arrington and Trotter saying things like after a hit "All day long Ricky" and "bring it Ricky". Our D had zero intensity last year and I think a large part of that was due to the fact that we did not replace Lavars presense in that regard. Now weather or not we should resign him I'd probably say no cuz he is so broken now. We need to search for a Defensive leader like Lavar was in his best days here.


I get what you're saying, the defense did seem to lack fire at times last season but I agree with JBD, I think the team can find that leader in-house. Additionally, again agreeing with the man in the bag, LA might have been that leader at some point but his last two seasons were marked by whining and moaning, not leadership.

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 3:33 pm
by redskingush
I don't care what anybody say about lavar, he's struggling as of late because of that knee injury, he was one of the best LB before injuries were a factor. I think alot of teams think he can still be an impact thats why there is interest in him. he's been getting big time money beacuse he made himself into a big money Linebacker. In hindsight yes, hes hasnt been worth it, but know for a reasonable price, hed be a good pickup if the injuries get healed, but that is the question.

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 4:26 pm
by Fios
Maybe somewhere else, not in DC. Let's not forget this:
http://www.thehogs.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=12436&highlight=arrington+year

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 9:48 pm
by HEROHAMO
Fios wrote:
cleg wrote:Bring him back - he's been humbled and God knows our defense could use the help.


How would he help? He's already demonstrated that he 1) can't or won't play in the current scheme and 2) he can't stay healthy; he hasn't played a full season in three years and has missed more than half of the season two out of the past three years.
he would be better than Holdman! He also could help out Mcintosh.

Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2007 11:18 pm
by 1niksder
HEROHAMO wrote:
Fios wrote:
cleg wrote:Bring him back - he's been humbled and God knows our defense could use the help.


How would he help? He's already demonstrated that he 1) can't or won't play in the current scheme and 2) he can't stay healthy; he hasn't played a full season in three years and has missed more than half of the season two out of the past three years.
he would be better than Holdman! He also could help out Mcintosh.

Holdman is gone and Rocky did pretty good standing on the sidelines without any help last year.

Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 10:00 am
by KazooSkinsFan
1niksder wrote:
HEROHAMO wrote:
Fios wrote:
cleg wrote:Bring him back - he's been humbled and God knows our defense could use the help.


How would he help? He's already demonstrated that he 1) can't or won't play in the current scheme and 2) he can't stay healthy; he hasn't played a full season in three years and has missed more than half of the season two out of the past three years.
he would be better than Holdman! He also could help out Mcintosh.

Holdman is gone and Rocky did pretty good standing on the sidelines without any help last year.


Haven't you been listening to the bashers? MacIntosh turned out to be the second coming when he played at the end of the year and it was further proof Gibbs was addled and GW arrogant and the bashers know how to run a football team better then our inept organization any day of the week as they always know what we should have done.

And you thought Rocky just stood on the sideline? Man, you need to listen to the "I told you so's" more to increase your football IQ. Personally I thought Rocky played fine for a rookie and it demonstrated they actually prepared him well, but I was apparently wrong on that.

Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 10:00 am
by InsaneBoost
Lavar isn't as good as he was (IMO). I think this injury is going to haunt him for the next seasons.


Whatever happend to his whole, "They love me here in New York."


Hahahaha, piece of crap.

Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 12:55 pm
by The Hogster
InsaneBoost wrote:Lavar isn't as good as he was (IMO). I think this injury is going to haunt him for the next seasons.


Whatever happend to his whole, "They love me here in New York."


Hahahaha, piece of crap.


They call me "Mr. Nickles"....what a moron.

Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 4:33 pm
by Fios
The Hogster wrote:
InsaneBoost wrote:Lavar isn't as good as he was (IMO). I think this injury is going to haunt him for the next seasons.


Whatever happend to his whole, "They love me here in New York."


Hahahaha, piece of crap.


They call me "Mr. Nickles"....what a moron.
I think he was estimating what he would actually be worth to the Giants ... he overestimated

Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 4:38 pm
by REDEEMEDSKIN
Fios wrote:
The Hogster wrote:
InsaneBoost wrote:Lavar isn't as good as he was (IMO). I think this injury is going to haunt him for the next seasons.


Whatever happend to his whole, "They love me here in New York."


Hahahaha, piece of crap.


They call me "Mr. Nickles"....what a moron.
I think he was estimating what he would actually be worth to the Giants ... he overestimated

Now the question remains on how Lavar will bad-mouth the Giants coaching staff and front office for his release.

:roll:

Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 1:46 am
by HEROHAMO
I want Lavar! I want Lavar!

Reasons why
1. He was drafted a Redskin he belongs here.
2. Gave his heart and soul to the Redskins.
3. Has all the talent in the world.
4. You know he doesnt look right in any other uniform.
5. He is and always will be my favorite Redskin.

Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 2:59 am
by 1niksder
HEROHAMO wrote:I want Lavar! I want Lavar!

Reasons why

Or why not :shock:

HEROHAMO wrote:1. He was drafted a Redskin he belongs here.

If he belonged he'd be here, unless he had been stolen- someone con-ed us out of him or he the poor guy just got lost

HEROHAMO wrote:2. Gave his heart and soul to the Redskins.

The only thing we can prove he gave the Redskins is a little cap relief last year.

HEROHAMO wrote:3. Has all the talent in the world.

Had would have been a better word... years ago :evil:

HEROHAMO wrote:4. You know he doesnt look right in any other uniform.

OK you got me there
HEROHAMO wrote:5. He is and always will be my favorite Redskin.

He's not a Redskin

Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 9:58 am
by welch
Knee: never regained the strength

Head: couldn't keep it. Played wherever his spirit took him. Impulsive?

Never learned. Did not improve in two years under Williams. Compare Wilbur Marshall coached by Richie Petibon: Wilbur freelanced, blew assignments, but then settled into the scheme and went to the Pro Bowl. Petibon kept at it, Gibbs backed Richie, and Marshall learned.

No more Lavar. Not here...