Page 20 of 29

Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 6:44 pm
by Countertrey
Fios wrote:There's your THIRD non-factor Haynesworth Aikman you idiot


Fixed it for you, FIOS

Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 6:44 pm
by cvillehog
Kolb's just asking to get smacked.

Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 6:44 pm
by Champsturf
No holding call???

Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 6:44 pm
by dlc
If these are real fans on this board, it's pathetic. The D has held this "unstoppable" offense to 6 points so far, and we're up by 11 and everyone is doing nothing but complaining.

Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 6:45 pm
by ATX_Skins
Wahoo McDaniels wrote:Anybody who thinks Donovan McNabb is an elite QB is a moron. I can't watch him underthrow and one hop throws anymore. I wish we would have bitten the bullet and did what it took to draft Bradford.


Pretty nice pass to Cooley though, and to Armstrong.

Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 6:45 pm
by Wahoo McDaniels
I've seen this script too many times. They get points here, we go 3-and-out and they get the ball back for the win.

Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 6:45 pm
by MDSKINSFAN
Fios wrote:There's your non-factor Haynesworth Aikman you idiot


Every time he is in he causes a disturbance, but yet he still says he is a non-factor. Idiot.

Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 6:45 pm
by Countertrey
Nice Job los

Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 6:46 pm
by cvillehog
The Hogster wrote:
cvillehog wrote:
The Hogster wrote:
cvillehog wrote:
The Hogster wrote:
cvillehog wrote:I'm nit sure I get all the criticism of the defense in this game. We've held them to 6 points. I know we have given up some yardage on dump off plays, and have been having more trouble getting off the field on 3rd down, but we're still winning!


Not all of the blame. They've knocked out Vick and caused a turnover. But, their inability to stop them has kept our offense off the field and they will tire out like always if they don't get them off the field.


Our offense's inability to get first downs has kept the offense off the field!


Where were you when they announced the stat that the Skins lead the NFL in allowing drives of 10 plays or more. Took a pi$$ i guess.


So you are saying the defense is responsible for three drives in a row ending in a turnover and two three and outs?


No, but you can't have your dead last ranked defense allowing their offense to hold the ball all quarter.


But NOT SCORE POINTS!

How do you not get that math?

Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 6:46 pm
by Hoss
nice job d

Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 6:47 pm
by Fios
Come on offense, all I want is a 7 minute TD drive, I don't ask for much

Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 6:47 pm
by dlc
...and now another defensive stop. No credit for the D there either? Haslett has learned to let the O prove that they can beat coverage before we blitz them.

Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 6:47 pm
by cvillehog
dlc wrote:If these are real fans on this board, it's pathetic. The D has held this "unstoppable" offense to 6 points so far, and we're up by 11 and everyone is doing nothing but complaining.


That's what I'm saying! Thank you.

Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 6:47 pm
by The Hogster
cvillehog wrote:
The Hogster wrote:
cvillehog wrote:
The Hogster wrote:
cvillehog wrote:
The Hogster wrote:
cvillehog wrote:I'm nit sure I get all the criticism of the defense in this game. We've held them to 6 points. I know we have given up some yardage on dump off plays, and have been having more trouble getting off the field on 3rd down, but we're still winning!


Not all of the blame. They've knocked out Vick and caused a turnover. But, their inability to stop them has kept our offense off the field and they will tire out like always if they don't get them off the field.


Our offense's inability to get first downs has kept the offense off the field!


Where were you when they announced the stat that the Skins lead the NFL in allowing drives of 10 plays or more. Took a pi$$ i guess.


So you are saying the defense is responsible for three drives in a row ending in a turnover and two three and outs?


No, but you can't have your dead last ranked defense allowing their offense to hold the ball all quarter.


But NOT SCORE POINTS!

How do you not get that math?


You have to be 12 years old if you think you can allow NFL teams to dominate time of possession and expect to keep them from scoring every week. :LOL: Where were you when the Rams served us a 30 piece? Taking another pi$$??

Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 6:47 pm
by ATX_Skins
I am going to credit the secondary for Kolb running around like an idiot.

Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 6:48 pm
by Fios
The Hogster wrote:
cvillehog wrote:
The Hogster wrote:
cvillehog wrote:
The Hogster wrote:
cvillehog wrote:
The Hogster wrote:
cvillehog wrote:I'm nit sure I get all the criticism of the defense in this game. We've held them to 6 points. I know we have given up some yardage on dump off plays, and have been having more trouble getting off the field on 3rd down, but we're still winning!


Not all of the blame. They've knocked out Vick and caused a turnover. But, their inability to stop them has kept our offense off the field and they will tire out like always if they don't get them off the field.


Our offense's inability to get first downs has kept the offense off the field!


Where were you when they announced the stat that the Skins lead the NFL in allowing drives of 10 plays or more. Took a pi$$ i guess.


So you are saying the defense is responsible for three drives in a row ending in a turnover and two three and outs?


No, but you can't have your dead last ranked defense allowing their offense to hold the ball all quarter.


But NOT SCORE POINTS!

How do you not get that math?


You have to be 12 years old if you think you can allow NFL teams to dominate time of possession and expect to keep them from scoring every week. :LOL: Where were you when the Rams served us a 30 piece? Taking another pi$$??


Keep it civil

Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 6:48 pm
by ATX_Skins
nooo, run the ball pleeeease guys

Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 6:48 pm
by spenser
Fios wrote:Come on offense, all I want is a 7 minute TD drive, I don't ask for much



Can we stretch that out over say... 3 games?

Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 6:48 pm
by Countertrey
I find Sellers just revolting...

Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 6:48 pm
by Chris Luva Luva
Is this my first gameday thread?


Goodness gracious if they don't stop throwing the ball to SELLERS!!!!

Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 6:49 pm
by tribeofjudah
Sellers is an idiot....cut him NOW

Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 6:49 pm
by ATX_Skins
Sellers is turrible

Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 6:49 pm
by jeremyroyce
Dang blasted Sellers

Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 6:49 pm
by cvillehog
The Hogster wrote:
cvillehog wrote:
The Hogster wrote:
cvillehog wrote:
The Hogster wrote:
cvillehog wrote:
The Hogster wrote:
cvillehog wrote:I'm nit sure I get all the criticism of the defense in this game. We've held them to 6 points. I know we have given up some yardage on dump off plays, and have been having more trouble getting off the field on 3rd down, but we're still winning!


Not all of the blame. They've knocked out Vick and caused a turnover. But, their inability to stop them has kept our offense off the field and they will tire out like always if they don't get them off the field.


Our offense's inability to get first downs has kept the offense off the field!


Where were you when they announced the stat that the Skins lead the NFL in allowing drives of 10 plays or more. Took a pi$$ i guess.


So you are saying the defense is responsible for three drives in a row ending in a turnover and two three and outs?


No, but you can't have your dead last ranked defense allowing their offense to hold the ball all quarter.


But NOT SCORE POINTS!

How do you not get that math?


You have to be 12 years old if you think you can allow NFL teams to dominate time of possession and expect to keep them from scoring every week. :LOL: Where were you when the Rams served us a 30 piece? Taking another pi$$??


Every week? I'm talking about the people saying the defense is bad today. They've been good.

Posted: Sun Oct 03, 2010 6:49 pm
by REDEEMEDSKIN
C'mon, cville, you gotta admit that the score would be a lot closer if Ron Mexico were still under center.