Page 20 of 26

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 7:10 pm
by dnpmakkah
Our offense is fine except for Brunell, Samuels, Jansen, Dockery, and Racbach other than that they are good.

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 7:10 pm
by RedskinsFreak
Even Dick Stockton, who's older than the first buffalo nickel, can see that they have to know what Campbell can do before next year's draft.

It's also time to start planning to replace Samuels. The trend is to speed rushers as DEs. And now, each one gets by #60 easier than the one before.

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 7:10 pm
by DaSkins24
As bad as Brunell has been, the gameplan offensivley and defensivley has been almost as bad.

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 7:10 pm
by redskingush
Belive it or not i still Love the REDSKINS.

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 7:10 pm
by RedskinsFreak
Even Dick Stockton, who's older than the first buffalo nickel, can see that they have to know what Campbell can do before next year's draft.

It's also time to start planning to replace Samuels. The trend is to speed rushers as DEs. And now, each one gets by #60 easier than the one before.

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 7:10 pm
by die cowboys die
Chris Luva Luva wrote:
NikiH wrote:
doroshjt wrote:Is it me or are the colts a bunch a A Holes, going for two when up by 19, calling a time out when still up by 19 with only 4 minutes left.


The real problem is that they let Peyton make those decisions and he is truly a jerk. I've seen interviews with him where he shows his personality and he is not a nice guy.


But they win games and thats all that matters.

Did you see the MNF game?
Did you see Denny Green do the "right" thing and not continually score?
Did you see the Bears come back and win?

They can't fold up and expect the skins to continue to suck. It'd be their luck that they come back and win.


chris, i totally agree. the colts have done nothing wrong. it just FEELS insulting to us because we all knew there was no way we could come back. it was theoretically possible though, and strategically/morally sound of the colts to make those decisions.


one last thing- brunell is still in the game because joe gibbs knows this is his last game ever and he wants to let him finish it in "dignity" instead of being benched in the last game of his career.

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 7:10 pm
by forskins
DaSkins24 wrote:Aikman cant figure out why Campbell cant get into the game. Aikman should get an account on this website...he would fit right in.


did you just praise a HOF Cowboy?? *gasps*

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 7:11 pm
by Chris Luva Luva
dnpmakkah wrote:Our offense is fine expect for Brunell, Samuels, Jansen, Dockery, and Racbach other than that they are good.


The coaches should have given Samuels help. Ive seen better tackles have issues with Freeny too.

DaSkins24 wrote:As bad as Brunell has been, the gameplan offensivley and defensivley has been almost as bad.


I agree.

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 7:11 pm
by FiveWidez
Chris Luva Luva wrote:
NikiH wrote:
doroshjt wrote:Is it me or are the colts a bunch a A Holes, going for two when up by 19, calling a time out when still up by 19 with only 4 minutes left.


The real problem is that they let Peyton make those decisions and he is truly a jerk. I've seen interviews with him where he shows his personality and he is not a nice guy.


I am sorry but you don't know anything. Manning is a stand up guy. Get outta here with that crap.

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 7:11 pm
by Burgandyandglory
gus wrote:
Burgandyandglory wrote:
DaSkins24 wrote:Postgame press conference:

Reporter: Joe, will you make a QB switch heading into the bye week with the struggles of Brunell?

Gibbs: I dont think Mark is the problem. We are in a big hole, but we have good men here, men with great character.
.



Translated: The season is in the toilet.


Forgot about "Mark gives us the best chance to win"......,




Yep, still waiting for that "best chance." haven't seen it yet.

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 7:12 pm
by dnpmakkah
RedskinsFreak wrote:It's also time to start planning to replace Samuels. The trend is to speed rushers as DEs. And now, each one gets by #60 easier than the one before.
Samuels has been a major bust for being a #3 pick. His entire exsistance is based on potential and name. Otherwise he sucks IMO.

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 7:12 pm
by redskingush
Burgandyandglory wrote:
gus wrote:
Burgandyandglory wrote:
DaSkins24 wrote:Postgame press conference:

Reporter: Joe, will you make a QB switch heading into the bye week with the struggles of Brunell?

Gibbs: I dont think Mark is the problem. We are in a big hole, but we have good men here, men with great character.
.



Translated: The season is in the toilet.


Forgot about "Mark gives us the best chance to win"......,




Yep, still waiting for that "best chance." haven't seen it yet.


We would have never beat the Texans without him remember 22 straight passes in the flat :)

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 7:12 pm
by Champsturf
[quote="forskins"][quote="DaSkins24"]Aikman cant figure out why Campbell cant get into the game. Aikman should get an account on this website...he would fit right in.[/quote]

did you just praise a HOF Cowboy?? *gasps*[/quote]

As much as I hated Aikmen as a player, I LOVE him in the booth. He's nothing like Irvin.

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 7:13 pm
by DaSkins24
dnpmakkah wrote:
RedskinsFreak wrote:It's also time to start planning to replace Samuels. The trend is to speed rushers as DEs. And now, each one gets by #60 easier than the one before.
Samuels has been a major bust for being a #3 pick. His entire exsistance is based on potential and name. Otherwise he sucks IMO.


I agree. With a #3 overall pick, you should be getting a Walter Jones/Jonathan Ogden type LT.

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 7:14 pm
by dnpmakkah
Boy I am so glad I am watching this game alone otherwise I would be inclined to hit someone. Thats how upset I am.

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 7:14 pm
by redskingush
2-5, I never thought that was possible 7 weeks ago.

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 7:14 pm
by DaSkins24
Hey, I am lefthanded, somewhat mobile, and can definitley throw 30 screen passes a game. Maybe I should drive up to DC and apply for a job as starting QB.

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 7:14 pm
by NikiH
FiveWidez wrote:
Chris Luva Luva wrote:
NikiH wrote:
doroshjt wrote:Is it me or are the colts a bunch a A Holes, going for two when up by 19, calling a time out when still up by 19 with only 4 minutes left.


The real problem is that they let Peyton make those decisions and he is truly a jerk. I've seen interviews with him where he shows his personality and he is not a nice guy.


I am sorry but you don't know anything. Manning is a stand up guy. Get outta here with that crap.


Excuse me but your stupid post is not going to make me go any where. I have seen many things that say just the opposite and you are entitled to your opinion just as much as I am mine. I know quite a bit and just because someone does not agree with you that does not give you the right to insult them and break the rules of this board.

Be frustrated with this game all you want but insulting me will not change the outcome.

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 7:14 pm
by FiveWidez
These penalties just prove how poorly coached this team really is. Gibbs needs to take Brunell and go to bible study. This is the damn NFL. He starts losing the team the moment he says Brunell will continue to start.

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 7:15 pm
by dnpmakkah
DaSkins24 wrote:
dnpmakkah wrote:
RedskinsFreak wrote:It's also time to start planning to replace Samuels. The trend is to speed rushers as DEs. And now, each one gets by #60 easier than the one before.
Samuels has been a major bust for being a #3 pick. His entire exsistance is based on potential and name. Otherwise he sucks IMO.


I agree. With a #3 overall pick, you should be getting a Walter Jones/Jonathan Ogden type LT.
Yep. I don't blame the coaches for picking him because he did have potential...but after a while when it becomes obvious you should trade the sucker.

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 7:15 pm
by Burgandyandglory
Chris Luva Luva wrote:
Burgandyandglory wrote:
Chris Luva Luva wrote:Its apparent we have some disgruntled players now....



Can you blame them? I would be disgruntled too, to say the least.


Its a shame its come to this. I hope Lloyd is pissed. Mark refuses to throw over 10 yards unless its going to Moss. Lloyd is consistently open and he came here to win. He said that when he signed, he wanted to win. He could have stayed in San Fran for this.
He's a hell of a WR and its being wasted.



You know what CLL, I would be surprised if we keep some of the players we need to win next year. If i were Portis, i'de want to be traded. I don't know what the coaching staff has against Lloyd. Whenever he has been called on to make a big play, he has done it. The only reason we tied the Titans last week was because of his 52 yard catch.

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 7:15 pm
by Smithian
I jut heard a brilliant idea...

"I say if we're going down, go down in style. Run a sweep to the Colts sideline and run over Manning on the bench"

Too bad we would be tackled before we reached the sideline.

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 7:15 pm
by gus
It's getting harder and harder to make my 5 year old kid become a Skins fan if they keep losing every week..... I'm running out of excuses

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 7:16 pm
by Chris Luva Luva
"Brunell going underneath Xplayer...."

Alll game long.

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 7:16 pm
by CPallDAY08
Smithian wrote:I jut heard a brilliant idea...

"I say if we're going down, go down in style. Run a sweep to the Colts sideline and run over Manning on the bench"

Too bad we would be tackled before we reached the sideline.
:lol: