Posted: Tue Nov 16, 2010 12:03 am
Countertrey wrote:On that note, I'm out fellas... maybe they'll be better after the bye... next year.
More like when they say bye-bye to a bunch a people. Some coaches included.
Washington football community discussions spanning the Redskins to Commanders era. 20+ years of game analysis, player discussions, and fan perspectives.
https://the-hogs.net/messageboard/
Countertrey wrote:On that note, I'm out fellas... maybe they'll be better after the bye... next year.
KazooSkinsFan wrote:CanesSkins26 wrote:KazooSkinsFan wrote:CanesSkins26 wrote:His oline last year was HORRIBLE and he still put up good numbers.
As horrible as this one?
They were bad all year. He got sacked 13 times in the first four games. I think they had a lot of line injuries and by the end of the year it completely fell apart. At least that's why my Eagles fans friends tell me.
I agree with what you're saying. I remember they had a lot of injuries. If I remember right they lost a key free agent or two to start the year. I'm not disputing they were bad though, I'm just disputing they were as bad as our OL all year as ours has been all year.
KazooSkinsFan wrote:CanesSkins26 wrote:KazooSkinsFan wrote:CanesSkins26 wrote:His oline last year was HORRIBLE and he still put up good numbers.
As horrible as this one?
They were bad all year. He got sacked 13 times in the first four games. I think they had a lot of line injuries and by the end of the year it completely fell apart. At least that's why my Eagles fans friends tell me.
I agree with what you're saying. I remember they had a lot of injuries. If I remember right they lost a key free agent or two to start the year. I'm not disputing they were bad though, I'm just disputing they were as bad as our OL all year as ours has been all year.
KazooSkinsFan wrote:CanesSkins26 wrote:KazooSkinsFan wrote:CanesSkins26 wrote:His oline last year was HORRIBLE and he still put up good numbers.
As horrible as this one?
They were bad all year. He got sacked 13 times in the first four games. I think they had a lot of line injuries and by the end of the year it completely fell apart. At least that's why my Eagles fans friends tell me.
I agree with what you're saying. I remember they had a lot of injuries. If I remember right they lost a key free agent or two to start the year. I'm not disputing they were bad though, I'm just disputing they were as bad as our OL all year as ours has been all year.
Countertrey wrote:On that note, I'm out fellas... maybe they'll be better after the bye... next year.
No kidding. WTF was THAT?SAP_Pete wrote:Haynesworth taking a nap.
Skinsfan55 wrote:Absolutely inexcusable by Haynesworth. He layed on the ground while Vick saw no pressure.
Champsturf wrote:CanesSkins26 wrote:KazooSkinsFan wrote:CanesSkins26 wrote:His oline last year was HORRIBLE and he still put up good numbers.
As horrible as this one?
Actually, yes. Especially at the end of the year. The Eagles couldn't block anyone last year. His last 3 games last year McNabb was sacked 12 times. McNabb played in 16 games last year and was sacked two or more times in 13 of those games. In 8 of the 16 he was sacked 3 or more times. There were 4 games with 4 sacks and in one game he was sacked 6 times.That's all I see when you post.
SkinsJock wrote:I'm glad they caught fat slob lying on the field as Vick keeps a play alive - now Vick is playing well BUT the fat slob is lying there and Gruden rightly calls him on it
I love when guys try to defend this guy as a defensive player
KazooSkinsFan wrote:dlc wrote:KazooSkinsFan wrote:dlc wrote:I think Shanny did lose the locker room with the McNabb decision. Just because you say that it is just over-hype and water under the bridge, doesn't make it so
Just because you say it was the McNabb decision doesn't make it so either. It also makes no sense. QB's get benched all the time and teams actually don't fall apart over it, it's part of life as a football player
Alright. You got me. This whole McNabb benching fiasco has had no effect on the team thus far. It's all a media hype.
How could I have read so much into it? It's just another one of those 45 point half let downs that we see after a QB gets benched that everyone in the whole sports world imagined was a problem.
Being "overblown" actually doesn't mean "made up." That you can't argue my actual position isn't showing you have confidence in yours. Overblown means made more of an issue than it is. It doesn't mean made up. I'd say nice try, but it really wasn't. I just didn't say ever it had no effect
CanesSkins26 wrote:SkinsJock wrote:I'm glad they caught fat slob lying on the field as Vick keeps a play alive - now Vick is playing well BUT the fat slob is lying there and Gruden rightly calls him on it
I love when guys try to defend this guy as a defensive player
No excuse for that lack of effort. But he has been dominant the last few weeks. You cant deny what he did against the Lions and Bears.
I don't mind accuracy, but MOSTLY negative? Really? I'm not going to look for it, but find me the last positive post he's made.1niksder wrote:Champsturf wrote:CanesSkins26 wrote:KazooSkinsFan wrote:CanesSkins26 wrote:His oline last year was HORRIBLE and he still put up good numbers.
As horrible as this one?
Actually, yes. Especially at the end of the year. The Eagles couldn't block anyone last year. His last 3 games last year McNabb was sacked 12 times. McNabb played in 16 games last year and was sacked two or more times in 13 of those games. In 8 of the 16 he was sacked 3 or more times. There were 4 games with 4 sacks and in one game he was sacked 6 times.That's all I see when you post.
He's mostly negative but also mostly accurate