Page 17 of 17
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 3:52 pm
by langleyparkjoe
2 elections republicans sent up complete jackazzes.
not sure how that will help anyone.
by the way, I was too through when I saw the elevator in romney's living room, he can't relate to middle to poor class, heeeeeeeeeell no.
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 3:59 pm
by SkinsJock
I rest my case

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 4:34 pm
by Deadskins
SkinsJock wrote:Deadskins wrote:SkinsJock wrote:speaking about 'believing' ... how can anyone believe that we might be better off continuing down the same path ... STUPID
I didn't vote for Obama, but what I find stupid is people questioning being better off after four years of his administration. Personally, my financial situation is much better than it was four years ago. I'm seeing light at the end of the tunnel now.
see that's part of the problem - I'm much better off than I was 4 years ago as well - so what
my point was that the voters should have voted for the party that would be better for the country - looking at the big picture = the Obama crowd have not done what they said they were going to do and the USA is NOT better than it was 4 years ago
I do not think that either party can quickly solve the issues at hand
I voted for the Republicans because the other group did not do what they said they would do
AND
I think the Republicans will find a better way out of this mess
- why do you think the stock market had the worst day in a year after the election?
btw - do you really think that either party would actually do what the other party insinuated they were going to do? Of course not
this was a huge waste of money and the Dems proved that the guys with the most negative ads would do better at the polls
I can't wait till next time

I'm not sure what you think they didn't do that you thought they would, but people vote their pocket books. You think the Democrats had the most negative ads? God, all I heard before the election was how bad a job Obama was doing. The only semi-positive ads I saw were Bill Clinton saying Obama was doing the right things to fix the economy (that Bush had ruined), and they were only semi-positive because they blamed the Republicans for the recession. But since you agree that you are better off, doesn't that mean that the economy is starting to rebound? I don't see how you figure that is not better for the country. I wouldn't put too much stock (no pun intended) in one day's market flux. Where was the market four years ago, and where is it now?
Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2012 4:40 pm
by langleyparkjoe
If you don't know about putting sugar on bread and eating it for lunch, you can't talk to us about you understand.
Same way I can't talk about Maybach's and such.
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 12:26 am
by SkinsFTW
Next election both parties will probably run a female and a minority. Those are the voters they obviously need to target since the whites are already pretty much decided on who they are voting for.
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 12:03 pm
by cowboykillerzRGiii
SkinsFTW wrote:Next election both parties will probably run a female and a minority. Those are the voters they obviously need to target since the whites are already pretty much decided on who they are voting for.
Oh ya? And who is that? Twitt Romney just cuz he's white too?
Paleeeaze! This isn't the 1800s bra...
Like LPJ said, never vote for a j/a with an elevator in his living room Smfh
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 12:26 pm
by DarthMonk
langleyparkjoe wrote:If you don't know about putting sugar on bread and eating it for lunch, you can't talk to us about you understand.
Same way I can't talk about Maybach's and such.
Yes, bro. I've had mayo sandwiches for dinner. Going out was Mickey D's - change back on your dollar - once a month.
Good old College Park.
Still making pancakes for the kids - scrapple too. Actually much healthier than McNuggets.
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 12:27 pm
by langleyparkjoe
DarthMonk wrote:langleyparkjoe wrote:If you don't know about putting sugar on bread and eating it for lunch, you can't talk to us about you understand.
Same way I can't talk about Maybach's and such.
Yes, bro. I've had mayo sandwiches for dinner. Going out was Mickey D's - change back on your dollar - once a month.
Good old College Park.
Still making pancakes for the kids - scrapple too. Actually much healthier than McNuggets.
Hard times see no color bro.
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2012 9:44 pm
by chiefhog44
SkinsJock wrote:Man oh man - am I ever glad that I listened to my financial advisor ..
"just put everything into cash or an IRA for a while - until we can see what happens ..."
I called Merrill Lynch and they said it would all be done by the close of business Tuesday
speaking about 'believing' ... how can anyone believe that we might be better off continuing down the same path ... STUPID
this is a great country and we're going to be OK - if you voted for Obama, i hope you get what you deserve
the guys that have the 'ability and the desire' will always find a way - anyone that thinks the government should 'help' - deserves to be uncomfortable

They're lining their pockets if they're telling you to get out right now.
Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2012 8:41 pm
by SkinsJock
Oh no - they're not telling me to get out - just to get liquid until things settle down
this is too easy to 'get out'
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 12:53 pm
by emoses14
I'll just go ahead and leave some numbers here for the good of the order:
61,910,594 for the President (51%)
(which is larger percentage of the vote than GW Bush and Clinton (both times), Ronald Reagan's 1st election, and Carter's election, but smaller than Ronny's second term landslide, GHW Bush and Obama's first election)
58,654,765 for former Gov. Romney (48%)
3,255,829 vote difference. (less than his 9.5 million victory over Sen. McCain, but more than George W. Bush's "win" over Al Gore and his actual win over John Kerry)
And counting.
Posted: Sun Nov 11, 2012 3:10 pm
by Deadskins
emoses14 wrote:more than George W. Bush's "win" over Al Gore and his "actual win" over John Kerry
You missed a set of quotes.
Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:07 am
by SkinsJock

It's going to be interesting to see how the boys in charge here handle things
How can it not go well when so many people think you can do it ...
I'm sure they have a good business plan ...

Posted: Wed Nov 14, 2012 11:04 pm
by DarthMonk
Countertrey wrote:Monk, Gallup has it 51-45... slip sliding away...
A few more stats:
538~
It was one of the best-known polling firms, however, that had among the worst results. In late October, Gallup consistently showed Mr. Romney ahead by about six percentage points among likely voters, far different from the average of other surveys. Gallup’s final poll of the election, which had Mr. Romney up by one point, was slightly better, but still identified the wrong winner in the election. Gallup has now had three poor elections in a row.
... and they forgot about the electoral college.