Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 10:53 pm
Do you blame him, we couldn't score in 28 minutes what makes him think they are gonna score in 2.
Washington football community discussions spanning the Redskins to Commanders era. 20+ years of game analysis, player discussions, and fan perspectives.
https://the-hogs.net/messageboard/
Hip-hip Hooray!brad7686 wrote:Halftime Speech...
Zorn- Greg, how many games have we won this year?
Blache-7
Zorn- 7 games. How did we ever win 7?
Blache- It's a miracle
Zorn- It's a miracle!
I would always take the ball in the 2nd half at an away game.chiefhog44 wrote:I keep wondering why after winning the coin toss, we elected to receive the ball first. Why not have our D start the game and get the ball first in the 2nd half? The likelyhood of us going 3 and out with the ball first is pretty high and that would give them great field position to start the game after the punt. If this is going to be a game of field position, why wouldn't we give them the ball first.
Just curious how others see this.
chiefhog44 wrote:I keep wondering why after winning the coin toss, we elected to receive the ball first. Why not have our D start the game and get the ball first in the 2nd half? The likelyhood of us going 3 and out with the ball first is pretty high and that would give them great field position to start the game after the punt. If this is going to be a game of field position, why wouldn't we give them the ball first.
Just curious how others see this.
Champsturf wrote:I would always take the ball in the 2nd half at an away game.chiefhog44 wrote:I keep wondering why after winning the coin toss, we elected to receive the ball first. Why not have our D start the game and get the ball first in the 2nd half? The likelyhood of us going 3 and out with the ball first is pretty high and that would give them great field position to start the game after the punt. If this is going to be a game of field position, why wouldn't we give them the ball first.
Just curious how others see this.
chiefhog44 wrote:Champsturf wrote:I would always take the ball in the 2nd half at an away game.chiefhog44 wrote:I keep wondering why after winning the coin toss, we elected to receive the ball first. Why not have our D start the game and get the ball first in the 2nd half? The likelyhood of us going 3 and out with the ball first is pretty high and that would give them great field position to start the game after the punt. If this is going to be a game of field position, why wouldn't we give them the ball first.
Just curious how others see this.
Makes me think Zorn is just so overconfident in his offense
Champsturf wrote:I would always take the ball in the 2nd half at an away game.chiefhog44 wrote:I keep wondering why after winning the coin toss, we elected to receive the ball first. Why not have our D start the game and get the ball first in the 2nd half? The likelyhood of us going 3 and out with the ball first is pretty high and that would give them great field position to start the game after the punt. If this is going to be a game of field position, why wouldn't we give them the ball first.
Just curious how others see this.
spenser wrote:chiefhog44 wrote:I keep wondering why after winning the coin toss, we elected to receive the ball first. Why not have our D start the game and get the ball first in the 2nd half? The likelyhood of us going 3 and out with the ball first is pretty high and that would give them great field position to start the game after the punt. If this is going to be a game of field position, why wouldn't we give them the ball first.
Just curious how others see this.
I am ALWAYS a fan of getting the ball in the 2nd half. I wish we would always kick off to start the game.
SCSkinsFan wrote:spenser wrote:chiefhog44 wrote:I keep wondering why after winning the coin toss, we elected to receive the ball first. Why not have our D start the game and get the ball first in the 2nd half? The likelyhood of us going 3 and out with the ball first is pretty high and that would give them great field position to start the game after the punt. If this is going to be a game of field position, why wouldn't we give them the ball first.
Just curious how others see this.
I am ALWAYS a fan of getting the ball in the 2nd half. I wish we would always kick off to start the game.
May have been one of those where the Raisins won the toss and deferred to the 2nd half.
My birthday is on the Monday after...PM me with your email and maybe we could both go!chiefhog44 wrote:Champsturf wrote:I would always take the ball in the 2nd half at an away game.chiefhog44 wrote:I keep wondering why after winning the coin toss, we elected to receive the ball first. Why not have our D start the game and get the ball first in the 2nd half? The likelyhood of us going 3 and out with the ball first is pretty high and that would give them great field position to start the game after the punt. If this is going to be a game of field position, why wouldn't we give them the ball first.
Just curious how others see this.
Are you going to the cincy game? If we win tonight, I'm going.
brad7686 wrote:none of this is important if you beat the rams.
cleg wrote:We went to the playoffs last year and have veteren players. The Ravens have rookie coach and QB as do the Falcons. I don't get why they are so much better. I mean I am happy for the Atlanta fans (all 3 of them) in the wake of the Vick nonsense but they are good with a no name coach and rookie QB. Here we have a rookie coach who has been aroubd the game forever and not in his early 40's yet he seems like a loon. Maube we just got old fast.