Page 17 of 33

Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 10:53 pm
by Krisk86
Do you blame him, we couldn't score in 28 minutes what makes him think they are gonna score in 2.

Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 10:53 pm
by SCSkinsFan
Once again our D holds up their end of the bargain. If the O could only score we could be a contender again.

Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 10:53 pm
by brad7686
Halftime Speech...

Zorn- Greg, how many games have we won this year?

Blache-7

Zorn- 7 games. How did we ever win 7?

Blache- It's a miracle

Zorn- It's a miracle!

Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 10:54 pm
by spudstr04
We actually look like the better team out there. Our O has picked it up late in the 2nd quarter, those turnovers killed us though. We need a nice turnover to start the 3rd quarter and may be a, offensive drive that doesn't end in a punt.

Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 10:56 pm
by spudstr04
Everything that we needed to happen today happened:

Cowboys lose
Falcons Lose

We need to win, we hold the tie-breakers with those two teams.

Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 10:56 pm
by Sir_Monk
at least watching the way the Cowboys lost warms my heart.

Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 10:56 pm
by Cappster
We are lucky to be only 14 down. Our offense has done jack. I have no faith in our offense, but I hope hey put my feeling to shame. Come on Skins; win the freaking game!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 10:57 pm
by broomboy
I'm gonna be bold and say we win this one. (Man this is gonna come back to haunt me)

Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 10:57 pm
by chiefhog44
I keep wondering why after winning the coin toss, we elected to receive the ball first. Why not have our D start the game and get the ball first in the 2nd half? The likelyhood of us going 3 and out with the ball first is pretty high and that would give them great field position to start the game after the punt. If this is going to be a game of field position, why wouldn't we give them the ball first.

Just curious how others see this.

Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 10:58 pm
by Champsturf
brad7686 wrote:Halftime Speech...

Zorn- Greg, how many games have we won this year?

Blache-7

Zorn- 7 games. How did we ever win 7?

Blache- It's a miracle

Zorn- It's a miracle!
Hip-hip Hooray!

Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 10:59 pm
by Champsturf
chiefhog44 wrote:I keep wondering why after winning the coin toss, we elected to receive the ball first. Why not have our D start the game and get the ball first in the 2nd half? The likelyhood of us going 3 and out with the ball first is pretty high and that would give them great field position to start the game after the punt. If this is going to be a game of field position, why wouldn't we give them the ball first.

Just curious how others see this.
I would always take the ball in the 2nd half at an away game.

Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:00 pm
by spenser
chiefhog44 wrote:I keep wondering why after winning the coin toss, we elected to receive the ball first. Why not have our D start the game and get the ball first in the 2nd half? The likelyhood of us going 3 and out with the ball first is pretty high and that would give them great field position to start the game after the punt. If this is going to be a game of field position, why wouldn't we give them the ball first.

Just curious how others see this.



I am ALWAYS a fan of getting the ball in the 2nd half. I wish we would always kick off to start the game.

Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:00 pm
by chiefhog44
Champsturf wrote:
chiefhog44 wrote:I keep wondering why after winning the coin toss, we elected to receive the ball first. Why not have our D start the game and get the ball first in the 2nd half? The likelyhood of us going 3 and out with the ball first is pretty high and that would give them great field position to start the game after the punt. If this is going to be a game of field position, why wouldn't we give them the ball first.

Just curious how others see this.
I would always take the ball in the 2nd half at an away game.


Makes me think Zorn is just so overconfident in his offense

Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:01 pm
by Sir_Monk
chiefhog44 wrote:
Champsturf wrote:
chiefhog44 wrote:I keep wondering why after winning the coin toss, we elected to receive the ball first. Why not have our D start the game and get the ball first in the 2nd half? The likelyhood of us going 3 and out with the ball first is pretty high and that would give them great field position to start the game after the punt. If this is going to be a game of field position, why wouldn't we give them the ball first.

Just curious how others see this.
I would always take the ball in the 2nd half at an away game.


Makes me think Zorn is just so overconfident in his offense


must not have felt has confident at the end of the half me thinks.

Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:02 pm
by chiefhog44
Champsturf wrote:
chiefhog44 wrote:I keep wondering why after winning the coin toss, we elected to receive the ball first. Why not have our D start the game and get the ball first in the 2nd half? The likelyhood of us going 3 and out with the ball first is pretty high and that would give them great field position to start the game after the punt. If this is going to be a game of field position, why wouldn't we give them the ball first.

Just curious how others see this.
I would always take the ball in the 2nd half at an away game.


Are you going to the cincy game? If we win tonight, I'm going.

Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:02 pm
by SCSkinsFan
spenser wrote:
chiefhog44 wrote:I keep wondering why after winning the coin toss, we elected to receive the ball first. Why not have our D start the game and get the ball first in the 2nd half? The likelyhood of us going 3 and out with the ball first is pretty high and that would give them great field position to start the game after the punt. If this is going to be a game of field position, why wouldn't we give them the ball first.

Just curious how others see this.



I am ALWAYS a fan of getting the ball in the 2nd half. I wish we would always kick off to start the game.


May have been one of those where the Raisins won the toss and deferred to the 2nd half.

Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:03 pm
by chiefhog44
SCSkinsFan wrote:
spenser wrote:
chiefhog44 wrote:I keep wondering why after winning the coin toss, we elected to receive the ball first. Why not have our D start the game and get the ball first in the 2nd half? The likelyhood of us going 3 and out with the ball first is pretty high and that would give them great field position to start the game after the punt. If this is going to be a game of field position, why wouldn't we give them the ball first.

Just curious how others see this.



I am ALWAYS a fan of getting the ball in the 2nd half. I wish we would always kick off to start the game.


May have been one of those where the Raisins won the toss and deferred to the 2nd half.


I heard the toss on the radio. We won and elected to recieve

Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:03 pm
by brad7686
none of this is important if you beat the rams.

Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:03 pm
by Champsturf
chiefhog44 wrote:
Champsturf wrote:
chiefhog44 wrote:I keep wondering why after winning the coin toss, we elected to receive the ball first. Why not have our D start the game and get the ball first in the 2nd half? The likelyhood of us going 3 and out with the ball first is pretty high and that would give them great field position to start the game after the punt. If this is going to be a game of field position, why wouldn't we give them the ball first.

Just curious how others see this.
I would always take the ball in the 2nd half at an away game.


Are you going to the cincy game? If we win tonight, I'm going.
My birthday is on the Monday after...PM me with your email and maybe we could both go!

Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:05 pm
by Mursilis
Why has Zorn made those two gutless calls - first, the FG try in a wind with a slumping Suisham, who can't hit jack outside 40 yards, and then the punt at the end of the half? Is he playing to win, or just not to lose by too much?

Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:05 pm
by Countertrey
brad7686 wrote:none of this is important if you beat the rams.


Thank you.

Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:05 pm
by SCSkinsFan
So what will our half-time adjustments be?
(Hint-Find some offense!)

Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:05 pm
by cleg
We went to the playoffs last year and have veteren players. The Ravens have rookie coach and QB as do the Falcons. I don't get why they are so much better. I mean I am happy for the Atlanta fans (all 3 of them) in the wake of the Vick nonsense but they are good with a no name coach and rookie QB. Here we have a rookie coach who has been aroubd the game forever and not in his early 40's yet he seems like a loon. Maube we just got old fast.

Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:07 pm
by broomboy
cleg wrote:We went to the playoffs last year and have veteren players. The Ravens have rookie coach and QB as do the Falcons. I don't get why they are so much better. I mean I am happy for the Atlanta fans (all 3 of them) in the wake of the Vick nonsense but they are good with a no name coach and rookie QB. Here we have a rookie coach who has been aroubd the game forever and not in his early 40's yet he seems like a loon. Maube we just got old fast.


Take veteran and replace it with old folks home residence and you have your answer :lol:

Posted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 11:07 pm
by Krisk86
Yeah we went to the playoffs with Todd Collins behind center