Page 17 of 17

Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 3:08 pm
by yupchagee
UK Skins Fan wrote:
yupchagee wrote:Smack in the kisser :?: 2 possibilities:
1) I'd block & break your arm.
2) I wouldn't block & you'd break your hand :evil:

Oooh, you're so tough. :nana: Anyway, who said I'd be the one doing the smacking? My beautiful hands are too valuable.



Who would be stupid enough to try & do your smacking for you?

Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 10:08 pm
by dnpmakkah
Israel, operating on a policy of nuclear ambiguity, has never confirmed or denied whether it has nuclear weapons. It is believed, however, to have the world's sixth-largest stockpile of atomic arms, including hundreds of warheads.

Iran so far has resisted calls by the U.N. Security Council to halt uranium enrichment, which can produce, among other things, the material for atomic bombs. The council set an Aug. 31 deadline that is accompanied by the threat of sanctions.
LINK HERE
Yep...don't you just love how the world is not fair to everyone.

Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 11:19 pm
by yupchagee
dnpmakkah wrote:
Israel, operating on a policy of nuclear ambiguity, has never confirmed or denied whether it has nuclear weapons. It is believed, however, to have the world's sixth-largest stockpile of atomic arms, including hundreds of warheads.

Iran so far has resisted calls by the U.N. Security Council to halt uranium enrichment, which can produce, among other things, the material for atomic bombs. The council set an Aug. 31 deadline that is accompanied by the threat of sanctions.
LINK HERE
Yep...don't you just love how the world is not fair to everyone.


Iran has threatened to destroy another country. Israel has not. I don't expect you to understand the difference.

Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 11:53 pm
by dnpmakkah
Words are one thing but actually committing the crime is another.

So-called "non terrorist" and "peaceful" loving countries like the U.S. and Israel are the ones that actually follow through with their threats.

Let’s take for example the nuclear bombardment of Japan during WW2. I've mentioned this several times. The U.S. continues to scare its citizens with the doomsday scenario or stories about "rogue" nations yet they are the ONLY ones in history to use a nuclear weapon. ONLY...CASE CLOSED.

Secondly, in 2003 we have the U.S. pre-emptive strike to topple Saddam. All their reasons for striking first were lies and still can't be proven. Is anyone confronting them on this? Nope. A crime occurred and has continued to occur yet you say nothing. People keep their mouths shut regarding Iraq not because they agree with it but because they don't want to sound unpatriotic. How sad?

Then we have the Israeli strikes on Iraq's nuclear facilities in the 80's. Again this was done pre-emptive which is absurd. A nation which is built on innocent until proven guilty I find it astonishing that more people do not complain about this practice. If the whole world thought like this it would be total chaos. Thankfully for us only 3 nations (U.S. Britain, Israel) have this type of MENTALity.

So please tell me again who is a threat to whom? :? You don't have to really answer I already know what you are going to say.

Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 3:30 am
by yupchagee
Words are one thing but actually committing the crime is another.

So-called "non terrorist" and "peaceful" loving countries like the U.S. and Israel are the ones that actually follow through with their threats.


So if someone threatens to stab you, you won't try to defend yourself untill the blade is in your gut?
Let’s take for example the nuclear bombardment of Japan during WW2. I've mentioned this several times. The U.S. continues to scare its citizens with the doomsday scenario or stories about "rogue" nations yet they are the ONLY ones in history to use a nuclear weapon. ONLY...CASE CLOSED.
In case you missed that day in history class WE WERE AT WAR!
Secondly, in 2003 we have the U.S. pre-emptive strike to topple Saddam. All their reasons for striking first were lies and still can't be proven. Is anyone confronting them on this? Nope. A crime occurred and has continued to occur yet you say nothing. People keep their mouths shut regarding Iraq not because they agree with it but because they don't want to sound unpatriotic. How sad?

Then we have the Israeli strikes on Iraq's nuclear facilities in the 80's. Again this was done pre-emptive which is absurd. A nation which is built on innocent until proven guilty I find it astonishing that more people do not complain about this practice. If the whole world thought like this it would be total chaos. Thankfully for us only 3 nations (U.S. Britain, Israel) have this type of MENTALity.
Fine, you wait till the bomb is headed your way before reacting. I prefer to live.

You obviously think that the US is evil. Why do you stay here? Wouldn't you be happier in Iran?

Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 1:45 am
by dnpmakkah
yupchagee wrote:Wouldn't you be happier in Iran?
Hell no I'd be afraid of getting bombed. We all know the U.S. is going to attack Iran sooner or later even if they give up pursuing nukes. :lol: :lol: :lol:

Posted: Mon Aug 28, 2006 1:33 pm
by yupchagee
dnpmakkah wrote:
yupchagee wrote:Wouldn't you be happier in Iran?
Hell no I'd be afraid of getting bombed. We all know the U.S. is going to attack Iran sooner or later even if they give up pursuing nukes. :lol: :lol: :lol:


I suspect you're bombed when you post this swill.