Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:08 pm
1fan4ramsey wrote:Definitiveskinjux- wrote:Damn, come on why the sack?
because the line stinks
yeah, he wasn't even blocked..tsk tsk
yeah, he wasn't even blocked..tsk tsk
The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era
Washington football community discussions spanning the Redskins to Commanders era. 20+ years of game analysis, player discussions, and fan perspectives.
https://the-hogs.net/messageboard/
Skins/Vikings gameday thread
Page 17 of 19
yeah, he wasn't even blocked..tsk tsk
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:08 pm
...and at the end of the drive, everything that plagues us comes roaring back.
How are we doing, generally, on penalties ?
How are we doing, generally, on penalties ?
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:08 pm
1fan4ramsey wrote:Definitiveskinjux- wrote:Damn, come on why the sack?
because the line stinks
Not as much as the giants line.
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:08 pm
tcwest10 wrote:...and at the end of the drive, everything that plagues us comes roaring back.
How are we doing, generally, on penalties ?
3 penalties for 10 yards.
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:09 pm
if the rams and someone else loses, vikes can still get in
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:09 pm
tcwest10 wrote:...and at the end of the drive, everything that plagues us comes roaring back.
How are we doing, generally, on penalties ?
On offense none!!
Defense a little.
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:09 pm
Clinton Portis wrote:1fan4ramsey wrote:Definitiveskinjux- wrote:Damn, come on why the sack?
because the line stinks
Not as much as the giants line.
you're serious, I'd be embarrased to say that.
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:09 pm
I was reading that we stand to make some kind of record if we hit a certain number.
That's one record I'd be glad to stay away from.
That's one record I'd be glad to stay away from.
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:09 pm
2 minutes left. anything can happen. 
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:10 pm
this game's over
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:10 pm
no prevent defense please!!!!!!
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:10 pm
Don't start driniking now, SkinsLavar. You'll have to run up to pee, and you'll miss the big pick by Taylor that settles it. 
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:11 pm
Have our two rookie O-linemen been playing much? (Wilson, Molinaro) How are they holding up?
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:11 pm
vikes are in if the Rams or Carolina lose, which they both are currently doing...
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:11 pm
We need a stop! I don't want to give up anymore points!
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:11 pm
1fan4ramsey wrote:Clinton Portis wrote:1fan4ramsey wrote:Definitiveskinjux- wrote:Damn, come on why the sack?
because the line stinks
Not as much as the giants line.
you're serious, I'd be embarrased to say that.
No the Giants definatly gave up more sacks this year 1fan.
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:11 pm
Uh-oh. No huddle.
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:12 pm
How would we do against Indy??
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:12 pm
Hooligan wrote:Have our two rookie O-linemen been playing much? (Wilson, Molinaro) How are they holding up?
neither as far as I know
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:12 pm
redskincity wrote:How would we do against Indy??
better than most I suspect
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:12 pm
3 & 10 37 seconds to go
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:13 pm
I agree.
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:13 pm
Son of a......
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:13 pm
no u mean 6-10
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:13 pm
Clinton Portis wrote:1fan4ramsey wrote:Clinton Portis wrote:1fan4ramsey wrote:Definitiveskinjux- wrote:Damn, come on why the sack?
because the line stinks
Not as much as the giants line.
you're serious, I'd be embarrased to say that.
No the Giants definatly gave up more sacks this year 1fan.
I know, but I'd like to compare things with winning teams.