Page 16 of 21
Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 4:38 pm
by JPM36
Come on Campbell...
Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 4:38 pm
by SCSkinsFan
Smithian wrote:SCSkinsFan wrote:At least we held them to 3. Is it NOW time for a Signature, Gibb's, clock eating, game winning drive? Let's go Skins!
Hail!
No.
Why not. We've shown the ability to it to start the game and to start the 2nd half. A little more optimism please? It's Christmas.
Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 4:39 pm
by JPM36
We need to stop throwing short of the marker on 3rd down.
Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 4:39 pm
by DaSkins24
Campbell still has a lot of developing to do. At least he is doing it during this wasted season.
Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 4:40 pm
by RedskinsFreak
There's still something not quite right with this offense. Sure, it's a work that took too long to get started but JC's stats -- at least in terms of total yards passing -- aren't too different from MB's.
Pct right around 50, yards in the high 100's to close to 200.
Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 4:40 pm
by Hoss
JPM36 wrote:We need to stop throwing short of the marker on 3rd down.
That would involve changing the whole offensive philosophy
Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 4:40 pm
by Smithian
If Phillip Daniels is any indication how gassed our defense is, then my money is on the Rams running it down our throats right here until even the benchies like Adam Archuleta and Ryan Boschetti play.
Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 4:41 pm
by SCSkinsFan
Of course another 3 & out doesn't get it done.
Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 4:41 pm
by 1niksder
Someone said something about something called a "turnover" a few pages back. No one could explain exactly what a "turnover" is but I'm thinking we might need one of those things, really soon.
Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 4:41 pm
by JPM36
Sean Taylor woke up on the wrong side of the bed today.
Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 4:42 pm
by Smithian
Sean Taylor throwing punches now. Oh no. Not again.
Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 4:42 pm
by JPM36
3rd and 8....come on defense...give us a chance!
Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 4:42 pm
by RedskinsFreak
One thing that I think this team is guilty of:
They buy too much into thinking everything is fixed, figured out, OK, etc., just because they won ONE game.
Yeah, it was a nice win over the Saints, but the problems aren't solved.
Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 4:44 pm
by RedskinsFreak
FUMMMMMMBLE!
Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 4:44 pm
by JPM36
That was that turnover thing I was talking about!!!!
Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 4:44 pm
by Smithian
TURNOVER!
Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 4:44 pm
by Hoss
there's that turnover thingy...
Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 4:44 pm
by 1niksder
Houston beat Indy!
Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 4:45 pm
by SCSkinsFan
Skins D has given up over 400 yds again. Let's just hope that is all for the day. Fumblle. Turnover. Santa Claus is in the house!
Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 4:45 pm
by Redskins Rule
1niksder wrote:Someone said something about something called a "turnover" a few pages back. No one could explain exactly what a "turnover" is but I'm thinking we might need one of those things, really soon.
WHAT!? WHAT!? whoever called it! Thank you!
Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 4:45 pm
by JPM36
Let them challenge...feel free to waste a timeout Linehan.
Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 4:45 pm
by Hoss
schweet!
Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 4:45 pm
by 1niksder
1niksder wrote:Someone said something about something called a "turnover" a few pages back. No one could explain exactly what a "turnover" is but I'm thinking we might need one of those things, really soon.
Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 4:47 pm
by SCSkinsFan
1niksder wrote:1niksder wrote:Someone said something about something called a "turnover" a few pages back. No one could explain exactly what a "turnover" is but I'm thinking we might need one of those things, really soon.
Spot on 1Nik!
Posted: Sun Dec 24, 2006 4:47 pm
by Hoss
come on skins. need to capitalize on this "turnover".