Page 16 of 26

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 6:48 pm
by Sir_Monk
We just took our 2nd TO...we are down 19...does Brunell not realize those might come in handy down the strech?

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 6:48 pm
by Champsturf
[quote="DaSkins24"]why does this team even have WR's?[/quote]

Good ones to boot?

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 6:48 pm
by redskingush
DaSkins24 wrote:I am running out of negative words to desribe Brunell with


Let me help you out

Sucks, ridiculous, terrible, to old, slow, gimpy, ugly.

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 6:48 pm
by CPallDAY08
Smithian wrote:Bench Brunell.

I'll be one of those booing when I go to a game this year when he is kept in because Gibbs is too confused to realize how useless he is.


its the playcalling not Brunell. Im not seeing bad throws by him im seeing bad playcalling. Its like Aikman said MB06 gives us the best chance to win this year not JC. Blame the Defense before you blame brunell.

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 6:48 pm
by die cowboys die
nnskinsfan wrote:Man, I don't understand some of these plays.


the coaches have absolutely no confidence in MB04, that is evident. so there should obviously be no reason to play him anymore.

why play a guy when you won't even make him PLAY while he's out there?

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 6:49 pm
by NikiH
What was Brandon Lloyd's beef there?

Does anyone know details of the penalty hitting a defenseless receiver? Why isn't that applying to this guy that keeps roughing up our receivers when they're not looking.

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 6:49 pm
by dnpmakkah
DaSkins24 wrote:why does this team even have WR's?
Because its mandatory. I'm with you though. They should get rid of the WR's since we don't use them and us the money to hire more coaches who are too stuburn to realize the truth.

This coaching staff doesn't want to win at all cost...they would rather win "their way" or nothing at all.

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 6:49 pm
by fredp45
Our Tackles are not good at pass blocking. I thing they're too slow of foot.

They're fine on runs but horrible when we're passing.

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 6:49 pm
by CPallDAY08
Santana Moss- 3 rec 20 yards

We need to get him the ball more.

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 6:50 pm
by Chris Luva Luva
This team is falling apart.

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 6:50 pm
by SkinzCanes
Great. LLoyd and Randle El fighting on the sidelines. This team is falling apart.

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 6:50 pm
by Champsturf
[quote="CPallDAY08"][quote="Smithian"]Bench Brunell.

I'll be one of those booing when I go to a game this year when he is kept in because Gibbs is too confused to realize how useless he is.[/quote]

its the playcalling not Brunell. Im not seeing bad throws by him im seeing bad playcalling. Its like Aikman said MB06 gives us the best chance to win this year not JC. Blame the Defense before you blame brunell.[/quote]

For the sake of not arguing, let's say it IS the playcalling. Why would they be calling these kinds of plays with playmakers like we have? Maybe, just maybe, it's because they don't think Brunell can do much more than these dump offs and screens.

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 6:50 pm
by Smithian
Who else here is more than expecting to see Gibbs desclare how much he loves Brunell?

Now our team is fighting.

Boo Redskins...

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 6:50 pm
by redskingush
Chris Luva Luva wrote:Another timeout, this is terrible. Mark my words, we'll need this timeouts at the end.

Anyone else noticed some pissed off WR's?


I dont want to say it Chris but we wont get close enough to need those timeouts, and yes the recievers are not happy, this could be an interesting off week, At Joes presser tommarrow he will announce JC as the started, right around 4:34pm est Monday.

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 6:50 pm
by dnpmakkah
Wow. I'm about to cry here seriously. This sad muther trucker Brunell sucks. Those who continue to support him must be his love slave or something.

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 6:51 pm
by DaSkins24
another 3rd and long pass play to the RB in the flat.....unbelievable

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 6:51 pm
by fredp45
3rd and 10, another screen pass...

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 6:51 pm
by DaSkins24
missed the field goal.

is this a skit on SNL?

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 6:51 pm
by redskingush
Goodnight Irene, its over

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 6:52 pm
by dnpmakkah
I hope we get buried today. We need to lose by 30 anything less will only keep Brunell in as starter longer.

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 6:52 pm
by Smithian
Redskins down 19. Not much time. A nice, long, 7 minute drive using two timeouts is just what the doctor ordered.

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 6:52 pm
by Sir_Monk
Like I said before, Novak is a heck of an improvement over Hall....

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 6:52 pm
by Burgandyandglory
NikiH wrote:What was Brandon Lloyd's beef there?

Does anyone know details of the penalty hitting a defenseless receiver? Why isn't that applying to this guy that keeps roughing up our receivers when they're not looking.



I have no idea. The refs are blind to begin with, so it's only what they see they can call. The defender should have been called for what he did. He clearly came from behind and ran into the back on Santana. I have no idea what is up with these refs today. I have to question some of their calls. What the he** was their deal on that kickoff? Why did they blow their whistle? idiots.

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 6:52 pm
by CPallDAY08
redskingush wrote:
Chris Luva Luva wrote:Another timeout, this is terrible. Mark my words, we'll need this timeouts at the end.

Anyone else noticed some pissed off WR's?


I dont want to say it Chris but we wont get close enough to need those timeouts, and yes the recievers are not happy, this could be an interesting off week, At Joes presser tommarrow he will announce JC as the started, right around 4:34pm est Monday.


I dont expect JC to be named starter anytime soon. How about the defense????! No one says anything about THE D! but everything about the O. good lord we give up too many points.

Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 6:52 pm
by SkinzCanes
So much for Novak being better than Hall.