Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:04 pm
7/10 on 3r down today, awesome
The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era
Washington football community discussions spanning the Redskins to Commanders era. 20+ years of game analysis, player discussions, and fan perspectives.
https://the-hogs.net/messageboard/
Skins/Vikings gameday thread
Page 16 of 19
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:04 pm
Hey, It's the rock
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:04 pm
The Rock is in!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:04 pm
Why can't you have both CP and Betts ?
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:05 pm
Could it be that Betts is a better fit in this system? I know one good game isn't enough to tell, but hmm...
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:05 pm
ummm, Clinton AND Betts
but mainly Clinton =)
but mainly Clinton =)
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:05 pm
Vikes are gonna cry!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:05 pm
1fan4ramsey wrote:tcwest10 wrote:There's always the offchance that Betts could blossom late like Stephen did.
then what comes of CP
With the way Gibbs likes to run the ball we'll need two solid backs
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:05 pm
Come on Rock you killing me with the loss
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:05 pm
tcwest10 wrote:Why can't you have both CP and Betts ?
thinking cp might have an issue with that
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:06 pm
....and that's 118 for Ladell on the ground. Outstanding. I'll bet Byner is giggling like an idiot. 
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:06 pm
Damn, come on why the sack?
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:06 pm
Ramsey sacked!!!!!!
Here comes our Bread and Butter.
Here comes our Bread and Butter.
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:06 pm
damn, nice tackle. thought Ramsey was gonna get away on that one
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:06 pm
1fan4ramsey wrote:tcwest10 wrote:Why can't you have both CP and Betts ?
thinking cp might have an issue with that
Thinking CP might have to step up vefore his opinion means anything to me, no ?
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:06 pm
Definitiveskinjux- wrote:Damn, come on why the sack?
because the line stinks
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:06 pm
coming up on 2 min. warning
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:07 pm
tcwest10 wrote:....and that's 118 for Ladell on the ground. Outstanding. I'll bet Byner is giggling like an idiot.
I know I certainly am!
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:07 pm
cough, elton brown.....
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:07 pm
had the ball for like 5 minutes this drive, perfect =)
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:07 pm
tcwest10 wrote:Why can't you have both CP and Betts ?
I'm Scared! Clinton might be replaced!
NOT CP!!!!
But Betts is a close 2nd.
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:07 pm
tcwest10 wrote:1fan4ramsey wrote:tcwest10 wrote:Why can't you have both CP and Betts ?
thinking cp might have an issue with that
Thinking CP might have to step up vefore his opinion means anything to me, no ?
true
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:07 pm
Could it be that Betts is a better fit in this system? I know one good game isn't enough to tell, but hmm...
Could well be.
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:08 pm
Vikes can still get in if they lose
Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2005 5:08 pm
Minne gets in if what????????????????