The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era

grampi wrote:

Leadbelly wrote:At least it's just Rogers' hands that are hurt...no big deal...he doesn't use them anyway

Has Rogers EVER intercepted a pass? I've never seen him make a catch.

Yes... I think it was the same game where Campbell hit a deep receiver in stride.


Weird, huh?

Need some offense. Defense on pace to give up the usual 600 yds.

If the Colts score again before the Skins do, this game is over....

No Banks?

cvillehog wrote:No Banks?

They kicked away from him

Gotta love the prevent defense.

The Hogster wrote:Need some offense. Defense on pace to give up the usual 600 yds.

The Skins are using their "strainer" defense. None of the big stuff gets through, but everything else flows right through....

mmmmmm Bacon

Leadbelly wrote:

cvillehog wrote:No Banks?

They kicked away from him

I don't think he was back there.

WHAT the heck was Bugel yelling about?

It's pretty simple really. If the Skins don't do more on offense AND either get to Manning and/or start doing a better job of covering the receivers, they have no chance whatsoever of coming back to win this game.

The only real highlight for the Skins in the 1st half has been Torain's running.

You have to take advantage of your opportunities. If the ball hits both your hands (except for Garcon) you have to make the catch. And that goes for both sides of the ball.

frankcal20 wrote:You have to take advantage of your opportunities. If the ball hits both your hands (except for Garcon) you have to make the catch. And that goes for both sides of the ball.

I don't think Rogers could catch a pass if it were thrown to him underhanded.

frankcal20 wrote:You have to take advantage of your opportunities. If the ball hits both your hands (except for Garcon) you have to make the catch. And that goes for both sides of the ball.

Yep, I'm afraid that the window is closed at this point. I have a feeling the score would have been tied right now had we been able to get those picks. Oh well, what's done is done. They need to find a way.

no points on this drive = no chance of winning

This is why sitting Haynesworth was a mistake. He helps in the pass-rush, which we don't have. Mike's Napoleon complex isn't helping. Doesn't mean we won't win tho.

spudstr04 wrote:and that's what we will be looking at all night!

why are you here?

grampi wrote:It's pretty simple really. If the Skins don't do more on offense AND either get to Manning and/or start doing a better job of covering the receivers, they have no chance whatsoever of coming back to win this game.

I post on here very infrequently but I always read it...you should read the game day thread from last week...same chicken little stuff...I'm not saying the Skins are going to win but seriously it's a little soon to write them off

Banks to the house

Score on this drive or we're done!

If you don't score more than 7 points a half ... you don't win many games ... against Peyton Manning, you don't win any of them.

Playing Manning requires an offense that controls the ball, and scores TDs. You've got to put 28 on the board to expect a reasonable chance of winning.

I think the D is just going to have to throw caution to the wind, and start bringing the house ... trying to play the coverage game with Peyton just doesn't work.

Mississippi Hog wrote:And the rout is on.

don't you have anything to contribute?

just a waste of time

Leadbelly wrote:

grampi wrote:It's pretty simple really. If the Skins don't do more on offense AND either get to Manning and/or start doing a better job of covering the receivers, they have no chance whatsoever of coming back to win this game.

I post on here very infrequently but I always read it...you should read the game day thread from last week...same chicken little stuff...I'm not saying the Skins are going to win but seriously it's a little soon to write them off

There's a drive that's probably dead in the water