Page 15 of 29

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 3:23 pm
by RedskinsFreak
Thundersloth wrote:Yeah, but it's about results and the common denominator in all of our futility is Snyder.

And don't forget Vinny:

Image

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 3:23 pm
by TeeterSalad
F. DAVIS !!

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 3:23 pm
by SCSkinsFan
A Fred Davis sighting! Wowsers!

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 3:23 pm
by Thundersloth
Need a TD here not FG

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 3:24 pm
by 1fan4ramsey
portis should have ran for the sidelines on that play

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 3:24 pm
by Thundersloth
RedskinsFreak wrote:
Thundersloth wrote:Yeah, but it's about results and the common denominator in all of our futility is Snyder.

And don't forget Vinny:

Image


I havn't forgotten him, this is his first year as VP of Football operations

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 3:24 pm
by spudstr04
Thundersloth wrote:Need a TD here not FG


could you imagine 2 red zone tds in a half?

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 3:24 pm
by Krisk86
Well almost in the Endzone to Cooley

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 3:25 pm
by 1fan4ramsey
spudstr04 wrote:
Thundersloth wrote:Need a TD here not FG


could you imagine 2 red zone tds in a half?


half a season?

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 3:25 pm
by Thundersloth
spudstr04 wrote:
Thundersloth wrote:Need a TD here not FG


could you imagine 2 red zone tds in a half?



I just wished for that for Chirsmas/Kwanzaa/Hannakuh

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 3:25 pm
by Sir_Monk
spudstr04 wrote:
Thundersloth wrote:Need a TD here not FG


could you imagine 2 red zone tds in a half?


In one qtr no less

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 3:25 pm
by The Dancing Bear
spudstr04 wrote:
Thundersloth wrote:Need a TD here not FG


could you imagine 2 red zone tds in a half?


going to need the 3 at some point..just don't eff up and not get points here

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 3:25 pm
by RedskinsFreak
Thundersloth wrote:I havn't forgotten him, this is his first year as VP of Football operations

But he's been "buying the groceries" -- in varying degrees -- for all nine years he's been here.

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 3:26 pm
by SCSkinsFan
No mistakes here JC!

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 3:26 pm
by spenser
I would not be surprised at ALL if we miss the FG

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 3:26 pm
by Thundersloth
Now my Christmas/Kwanzaa/Hannakuh dreams have been doused

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 3:27 pm
by SCSkinsFan
Crap. Should not have had to settle for 3.

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 3:27 pm
by RedskinsFreak
How hard is it to line up properly?

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 3:27 pm
by spenser
RedskinsFreak wrote:
Thundersloth wrote:I havn't forgotten him, this is his first year as VP of Football operations

But he's been "buying the groceries" -- in varying degrees -- for all nine years he's been here.



Thats gonna be one bad meal.

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 3:27 pm
by spudstr04
well...I think as a pessimistic fan....10 unanswered points is a good thing

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 3:27 pm
by Skinsfan55
I think Vinny's been fine in his first year, IMO Gibbs and Williams among others have been making the personnel decisions up until now.

He's done pretty well, except for the Jason Taylor thing, but Daniels kind of forced his hand.

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 3:27 pm
by BengalszoneBilly
I never thought my Bengals would be up by 7 at the half!

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 3:29 pm
by SCSkinsFan
Halftime = Beer time!

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 3:29 pm
by Thundersloth
RedskinsFreak wrote:
Thundersloth wrote:I havn't forgotten him, this is his first year as VP of Football operations

But he's been "buying the groceries" -- in varying degrees -- for all nine years he's been here.



But he really hasn't been on the hook since Dannyboy wasn't smart enough to name a general manager. So the only guy you can blame is Dannyboy. He wants to be like Jerry Jones in the worst way...the thing is...Jerry had Jimmy Johnson who was a great evalutor of talent. The closest thing we've had here under Dannyboy is Marty...who fired Vinny.

Posted: Sun Dec 14, 2008 3:29 pm
by spudstr04
SCSkinsFan wrote:Halftime = Beer time!


Redskins 1st possession = BEER TIME