Page 14 of 17
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 3:38 pm
by TeeterSalad
I think if Zorn wants any chance for a good season he has to go for it there
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 3:38 pm
by Hoss
they are toying with us. they only want to get closer for the FG
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 3:38 pm
by brad7686
that wasn't gibbs-esque
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 3:38 pm
by markshark84
If they didn't get that, would that have been Zorn's job?
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 3:39 pm
by Chris Luva Luva
And that idiot ran out of bounds.
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 3:40 pm
by Chris Luva Luva
Why is Santana in our goalne!?!? WTF is Zorn smoking!?!
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 3:40 pm
by PulpExposure
Ah, who needs time outs anyways, eh?
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 3:40 pm
by dlc
DaSkins24 wrote:Gutsy/dumb call but they got it.
It was a great call, with no timeouts, one yard essentially puts in a great position to kill the clock and win the game. Too bad Betts is an idiot and runs out of bounds.
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 3:40 pm
by SCSkinsFan
3rd and 3. What's it going to be Coach Z?
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 3:40 pm
by (d)oink
Chris Luva Luva wrote:And that idiot ran out of bounds.
You're going to be really pissed when we win this game aren't you.

Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 3:40 pm
by DaSkins24
Go for it again. Might as well.
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 3:41 pm
by Chris Luva Luva
Win or no win, this was an atrocious game offenssively.
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 3:41 pm
by dlc
dlc wrote:DaSkins24 wrote:Gutsy/dumb call but they got it.
It was a great call, with no timeouts, one yard essentially puts in a great position to kill the clock and win the game. Too bad Betts is an idiot and runs out of bounds.
If Betts didn't run out of bounds, they would have had about 1:30 or less to get a TD. Idiot!!!
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 3:41 pm
by welch
One pass to Kelly and then FG?
In all, I'm not sure why Zorn called TO with 2:13 left...doesn't the clock stop at 2, and arent the Skins ahead?
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 3:41 pm
by brad7686
Chris Luva Luva wrote:Win or no win, this was an atrocious game offenssively.
which ones aren't?
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 3:41 pm
by PulpExposure
Chris Luva Luva wrote:Win or no win, this was an atrocious game offenssively.
It was an offensive game.
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 3:42 pm
by Fios
Dear Visa, the commercial with guys dancing is not, in any way, funny.
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 3:42 pm
by SCSkinsFan
4th & 1. Go for it again? Go for it again?
99 for a possible win if they don;t make it, or get the 5 point lead with another (UGH!) FG?
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 3:42 pm
by SkinsJock
actually Chris - just not a good game at all
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 3:42 pm
by dlc
welch wrote:One pass to Kelly and then FG?
In all, I'm not sure why Zorn called TO with 2:13 left...doesn't the clock stop at 2, and arent the Skins ahead?
Because the play clock would've run out.
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 3:42 pm
by PulpExposure
Lol wasn't this a 10 point spread? Do the bookies even WATCH the Redskins play?
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 3:43 pm
by markshark84
Fios wrote:Dear Visa, the commercial with guys dancing is not, in any way, funny.
I like the Estrada sunglasses though.
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 3:43 pm
by Hoss
they should go for it
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 3:43 pm
by dlc
This might be dumb.
Posted: Sun Sep 20, 2009 3:43 pm
by Chris Luva Luva
I'd sell out for the run if I was the rams.