Page 14 of 25
Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2006 3:50 pm
by Champsturf
NikiH wrote:Champsturf wrote:NikiH wrote:Again does anyone know why Randel El is wearing that huge bandage?????????????
No, but I think Brunell wears a huge bandage every 28 days too.

This is inappropriate. If you'd like to get into a chauvinistic debate we can take it to smack.
What's chauvinistic about that? And you need to lighten up. I take a shot at our worthless QB and you get upset? Whatever.

Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2006 3:53 pm
by NikiH
The thing that we have in our favor is time of possession. We need a little bit of execution and we're there. The defense is trying to do their part, aside from that two huge plays but they were getting the Eagles right where they wanted them.
Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2006 3:54 pm
by FiveWidez
Champsturf wrote:NikiH wrote:Champsturf wrote:NikiH wrote:Again does anyone know why Randel El is wearing that huge bandage?????????????
No, but I think Brunell wears a huge bandage every 28 days too.

This is inappropriate. If you'd like to get into a chauvinistic debate we can take it to smack.
What's chauvinistic about that? And you need to lighten up. I take a shot at our worthless QB and you get upset? Whatever.

Champsturf is almost with me....i feel i can bring him to the dark side
Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2006 3:55 pm
by NikiH
He's not worthless. Every single play at least one defender was getting through that line. Is he supposed to block for himself and then throw the ball??
And that wasn't what I had a problem with. Calling him a female is what I have issue with. He's weak because he's a girl????

Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2006 3:57 pm
by FiveWidez
NikiH wrote:He's not worthless. Every single play at least one defender was getting through that line. Is he supposed to block for himself and then throw the ball??
And that wasn't what I had a problem with. Calling him a female is what I have issue with. He's weak because he's a girl????

Seriously? he is worthless. pressure or not. We aren't just talking about this game but every game. He serves no purpose as the starter.
Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2006 3:59 pm
by NikiH
His passer rating for the year is 91.5. HIs passer rating against Dallas was 102.1. That is NOT useless!!!!! Everyone keeps knocking the man but show me the hard statistics that back that up????
Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2006 4:00 pm
by Sir_Monk
start of the second half LETS GO SKINS!
NN
Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2006 4:00 pm
by Malicious
If I see Novak in the street..ever..he's gonna get a punch in the face. 2/6 is unacceptable.
Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2006 4:00 pm
by Hoss
novak lays it out!
Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2006 4:01 pm
by Champsturf
NikiH wrote:His passer rating for the year is 91.5. HIs passer rating against Dallas was 102.1. That is NOT useless!!!!! Everyone keeps knocking the man but show me the hard statistics that back that up????
3-5
Re: NN
Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2006 4:01 pm
by NikiH
Malicious wrote:If I see Novak in the street..ever..he's gonna get a punch in the face. 2/6 is unacceptable.
Yeah that's a very adult approach. I hope that happens because I'd love to see you convicted. This post is just plain stupid.
Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2006 4:02 pm
by xhadow
our D is playing pretty good
Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2006 4:02 pm
by NikiH
Is the game over???? The great McNabb is 5/17. THat's better??? I think not.
Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2006 4:03 pm
by Chris Luva Luva
Brunell can't even throw a slant. He had lloyd in prime position to convert and he threw it over his head.
Mark also throws the ball into coverage, he threw into triple coverage with moss.
MB is trash.
Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2006 4:03 pm
by FiveWidez
NikiH wrote:His passer rating for the year is 91.5. HIs passer rating against Dallas was 102.1. That is NOT useless!!!!! Everyone keeps knocking the man but show me the hard statistics that back that up????
I cant deal with this.....someone please take this one. Those stats are so padded.
Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2006 4:03 pm
by Champsturf
FiveWidez wrote:NikiH wrote:His passer rating for the year is 91.5. HIs passer rating against Dallas was 102.1. That is NOT useless!!!!! Everyone keeps knocking the man but show me the hard statistics that back that up????
I cant deal with this.....someone please take this one. Those stats are so padded.
I thought I did. 3-5
Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2006 4:04 pm
by RedskinsFreak
NikiH wrote:His passer rating for the year is 91.5. HIs passer rating against Dallas was 102.1. That is NOT useless!!!!! Everyone keeps knocking the man but show me the hard statistics that back that up????
You've picked the worst statistic with which to make your case.
The passer rating formula will generate a deceptively high number on 6-for-10 for 78 yards. That's a high percentage and no INTs but it's far, far from being a productive day as a QB.
Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2006 4:04 pm
by FiveWidez
NikiH wrote:Is the game over???? The great McNabb is 5/17. THat's better??? I think not.
I just can't
Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2006 4:05 pm
by NikiH
Ok the stats only apply when you support them? Whatever!!!
MB is our quarterback, like it or not!
Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2006 4:05 pm
by Chris Luva Luva
I think todays stats show how worthless stats can be. They can be used to prove a theory either way. The FACT is that we're 3-5, the fact is that we're losing, the fact is that we've seen MB04 miss some easy throws today.
So what he's getting pressure. WHEN HE DOESN'T HAVE PRESSURE HE NEEDS TO BE A VETERAN QB AND TAKE ADVANTAGE OF IT. He's getting rattled he needs to come out of the game.
Goose even said he has happy feet.
Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2006 4:06 pm
by xhadow
FiveWidez wrote:NikiH wrote:His passer rating for the year is 91.5. HIs passer rating against Dallas was 102.1. That is NOT useless!!!!! Everyone keeps knocking the man but show me the hard statistics that back that up????
I cant deal with this.....someone please take this one. Those stats are so padded.
Those stats don't take into account the fact that he's thrown almost all his incomplete passes either into the stands, Triple coverage, or into the dirt when there are obviously other recievers open. But they do take into acount that he only has 3 pics.
Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2006 4:07 pm
by NikiH
I'm not saying he is great. He's obviously not. I'm saying he's capable. He needs the line to block consistantly and then perhaps he can complete those passes.
Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2006 4:07 pm
by FiveWidez
NikiH wrote:Ok the stats only apply when you support them? Whatever!!!
MB is our quarterback, like it or not!
He is not my quarterback. My team apparently doesn't have one.
Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2006 4:09 pm
by Hoss
i think joe may lose this challenge
Posted: Sun Nov 12, 2006 4:09 pm
by RedskinsFreak
That ball was out BEFORE Taylor made contact!