Page 14 of 20

Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2005 4:03 pm
by GibbSkins
ive been a fan of the skins since i was 5 ( im now 37)and they praticed in carlise (where i was born).my brothers and i ust to walk 5 miles back then to see training camp.

Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2005 4:05 pm
by Redskin in Canada
Pollack and Erasmus are gone but we were not going to take a DE at 25 anyway.

Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2005 4:05 pm
by General Failure
GibbSkins wrote:ive been a fan of the skins since i was 5 ( im now 37)and they praticed in carlise (where i was born).my brothers and i ust to walk 5 miles back then to see training camp.


Was it uphill both ways and in three feet of snow?

Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2005 4:07 pm
by GibbSkins
General Failure wrote:Was it uphill both ways and in three feet of snow?


yep and we didnt have any money so we had to eat rocks :P

Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2005 4:09 pm
by General Failure
You had rocks?!

Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2005 4:12 pm
by GibbSkins
General Failure wrote:You had rocks?!


yes....most of them fell out of my head.. ](*,)

Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2005 4:12 pm
by RedskinsFreak
Redskin in Canada wrote:Pollack gone but we were not going to take a DE at 25 anyway.
Erasmus James just went to Minny. All the even remotely possible choices are now gone.

I think it's down to how the WRs pan out. I don't know, but I'm just not buying the drone of their taking Jason Campbell (or EVEN Aaron Rodgers if he's still there after the Packers pick).

Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2005 4:13 pm
by BossHog
Luxury.

We used to have to wake up and lick the road clean to get rocks.

Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2005 4:17 pm
by ToxicSkin
i think we could go WR with Mark Clayton if he's still there

Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2005 4:17 pm
by Redskin in Canada
RedskinsFreak wrote:I'm just not buying the drone of their taking Jason Campbell (or EVEN Aaron Rodgers if he's still there after the Packers pick).
Neither am I. I suspect that we may take Heath Miller if he is still available at 25. But there might be a couple of good WRs available.

Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2005 4:17 pm
by Scottskins
BossHog wrote:Luxury.

We used to have to wake up and lick the road clean to get rocks.


what are you talking about Boss? YOU were the one living in Luxury!!!

We had to wait for you to lick the road, before our turn. By the time you were done, the rocks were always all gone, but at least we had something to drink...

Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2005 4:20 pm
by BringThePain!
Dallas took the strategy, that I wish we took... now we've got face these two ends/olb twice a year... :(

Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2005 4:22 pm
by Redskin in Canada
The Pukes just took a second good step to really improve their defense and DL in particular today. Darn! :cry:

Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2005 4:22 pm
by BossHog
Cowboys take Marcus Spears and it's reported that the Cowboys are going to switch to a 3-4.

Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2005 4:23 pm
by Scottskins
BringThePain! wrote:Dallas took the strategy, that I wish we took... now we've got face these two ends/olb twice a year... :(


That's ok, we'll light em up :twisted:

Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2005 4:24 pm
by cvillehog
The Post already has an article on the 9th pick: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/ar ... Apr23.html

Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2005 4:25 pm
by curveball
Scottskins wrote:
BossHog wrote:Luxury.

We used to have to wake up and lick the road clean to get rocks.


what are you talking about Boss? YOU were the one living in Luxury!!!

We had to wait for you to lick the road, before our turn. By the time you were done, the rocks were always all gone, but at least we had something to drink...


Well, we was in line behinds y'all andin the only things we gots were the clumps of dirt thatud form when when of them high falutin' folks who had cars would spit part of their chaw outa winder.

Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2005 4:26 pm
by curveball
BossHog wrote:Cowboys take Marcus Spears and it's reported that the Cowboys are going to switch to a 3-4.



For sale: multile pro-bowler who doesn't fit the scheme. Glover's gone for an early second.

Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2005 4:27 pm
by GibbSkins
[/quote]

That's ok, we'll light em up :twisted:[/quote]

thats the spirit...ill bring the fule and u bring the liter...

Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2005 4:27 pm
by ToxicSkin
Jags select Matt Jones. We can't pick him now! 8)

Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2005 4:29 pm
by curveball
ToxicSkin wrote:Jags select Matt Jones. We can't pick him now! 8)


Darn, and I was really hoping you'd grab Matt Mamula. He'd have been a perfect fit.

Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2005 4:29 pm
by ToxicSkin
It's looking pretty good that we can fill our need for a WR with Mark Clayton.

Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2005 4:30 pm
by curveball
ToxicSkin wrote:It's looking pretty good that we can fill our need for a WR with Mark Clayton.


I hope not, he's the #1 WR on my board. Reminds me of Marvin Harrison.

Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2005 4:31 pm
by GibbSkins
"Coach Joe Gibbs said the team has already fielded one offer for the(25th) pick."

could get even more interesting yet 2day

Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2005 4:31 pm
by BringThePain!
Ravens will be taking Clayton... so we can forget that idea