Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2013 3:46 pm
Can we have a REAL safety any time soon?
Washington football community discussions spanning the Redskins to Commanders era. 20+ years of game analysis, player discussions, and fan perspectives.
https://the-hogs.net/messageboard/
Countertrey wrote:He's actually, he's playing pretty damned well from the pocket right now... sharp, accurate passes with mustard... this may be just what he needed.
Burgundy&Wha? wrote:ND Suh is going to eat us up next week.
You do that...Chris Luva Luva wrote:Countertrey wrote:He's actually, he's playing pretty damned well from the pocket right now... sharp, accurate passes with mustard... this may be just what he needed.
Until he shows us something more, I'll chalk it up to soft defense. Just like with the Eagles.
Burgundy&Wha? wrote:ND Suh is going to eat us up next week.
Countertrey wrote:You do that...Chris Luva Luva wrote:Countertrey wrote:He's actually, he's playing pretty damned well from the pocket right now... sharp, accurate passes with mustard... this may be just what he needed.
Until he shows us something more, I'll chalk it up to soft defense. Just like with the Eagles.
Countertrey wrote:You do that...Chris Luva Luva wrote:Countertrey wrote:He's actually, he's playing pretty damned well from the pocket right now... sharp, accurate passes with mustard... this may be just what he needed.
Until he shows us something more, I'll chalk it up to soft defense. Just like with the Eagles.
Countertrey wrote:I think Paul got some of that punt.
Countertrey wrote:You do that...Chris Luva Luva wrote:Countertrey wrote:He's actually, he's playing pretty damned well from the pocket right now... sharp, accurate passes with mustard... this may be just what he needed.
Until he shows us something more, I'll chalk it up to soft defense. Just like with the Eagles.
Chris Luva Luva wrote:Snout wrote:Chris Luva Luva wrote:Snout wrote:Chris Luva Luva wrote:Snout wrote:I cut the offense some slack because of the decision to play a rusty and limited RG, but our defen-sieve start is really depressing.
..... WTF...... Please explain to us how this makes ANY SENSE WHATSOEVER?
No sense whatsoever? Are you impressed by our defense? We gave up 33 points in week 1 (after the Eagles let up) and 38 more so far in this game. Rogers is having a career game. GB has 100 yards rushing for the first time in 45 games. Again, are you impressed by our defense? Do I really need to spell it out for you?
There's this thing in football, it might be a new sport for you so I'll say it slowly.
It's called time of possession. The redskins offense cannot convert on third down and tire their defense out. But in your wisdom have forgiven the offense for that small mistake. But hold it against the defense. That does not make any sense, to absolve the offense of responsibility. LMAO
Yeah, our defense sure was tired in that impressive first quarter. Of this game and the last game.
These are not games when our defense tires out in the fourth quarter. If we tire out in the first quarter . . . yeah WTF do I know?
You must not know much because the Eagles ran 53 plays in the 1st half last week. That's 2/3 of an entire game in one half. So yes, the inability to sustain a drive by the offense is horribly detrimental to the defense.
I'm sorry that you can't see the improved quality of the passes he is now throwing... must be that "New York state of mind"...NyfinestskinsfanBXTF wrote:Countertrey wrote:You do that...Chris Luva Luva wrote:Countertrey wrote:He's actually, he's playing pretty damned well from the pocket right now... sharp, accurate passes with mustard... this may be just what he needed.
Until he shows us something more, I'll chalk it up to soft defense. Just like with the Eagles.
Every team in the NFL does do that when leading by nearly a half century. All QB's look good when chasing from behind.
NyfinestskinsfanBXTF wrote:That may be a TD, but we will get Mara'ed!!!
Snout wrote:How many three and outs have we forced in the first quarter when our defense has been fresh? Too few. Is that on the offense? No doubt an effective office takes pressure off the defense, but that is overstating the obvious. If the whole approach was to start RG from the beginning of the season, then you can see from a mile away that the defense would need to carry the team for the first month. Have first quarter performances in the first two games suggested that the defense is rady to carry the team for the first month? I think not. But what do I know?
Chris Luva Luva wrote:If the offense can't operate with RGIII, don't play him. Him not being ready isn't going to magically turn the defense into something it isnt and no amount of hoping/wishing will change that.
I'm sorry that you can't see the improved quality of the passes he is now throwing... must be that "New York state of mind"...[/Countertrey wrote:NyfinestskinsfanBXTF wrote:Countertrey wrote:You do that...Chris Luva Luva wrote:Countertrey wrote:He's actually, he's playing pretty damned well from the pocket right now... sharp, accurate passes with mustard... this may be just what he needed.
Until he shows us something more, I'll chalk it up to soft defense. Just like with the Eagles.
Every team in the NFL does do that when leading by nearly a half century. All QB's look good when chasing from behind.
Burgundy&Wha? wrote:Another tackle by Rambo.