The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era

SAP_Pete wrote:Yet you keep posting here?

This isn't a competitive situation. It's a discussion forum. MAJOR Difference.

SAP_Pete wrote:Negative attention is better than no attention, amirite?

Personally, I don't care one way or the other.

CanesSkins26 wrote:

Hankersim from UF or in the 3rd

Frank!!! You're killing me. Hankerson is a Cane, NOT a Gator. That's about as low of an insult as you can say to someone.

Wouldn't worry about it, Frank... most of us can't tell the difference, either... very subtle differences in the structure of the brow ridges, I understand...

CanesSkins26 wrote:

Taking a QB for the sake of taking a QB is not the answer. Lets fill some other areas of need and address the QB of the future next year.

We can't keep putting off drafting a qb. You have no idea who is going to be available in next year's draft. The time to address qb is now.

I'm hoping we get Kaepernick tonight with one of our 2 picks.

CanesSkins26 wrote:

Taking a QB for the sake of taking a QB is not the answer. Lets fill some other areas of need and address the QB of the future next year.

We can't keep putting off drafting a qb. You have no idea who is going to be available in next year's draft. The time to address qb is now.

We are perfectly positioned to get Luck... just need a few more losses.

langleyparkjoe wrote:

Redskins_Fanatic wrote:

Mississippi Hog wrote:Disagreeing with the pick doesn't bother me at all. Be upset with it all you want. But to wish the man to totally fail or worse, die, is just plain sick and pathetic. This is a human being you are talking about. Good Riddance!!

Sports are more important than life and death to some of us.

Oh, well, as a guy who lived in DC area since the age of 2, the REDSKINS are that important to me and I'd NEVER say I hope they don't win another SB.. by the way, wut the heck are you doing here?

He's a troll......

PAPDOG67 wrote:

CanesSkins26 wrote:

Taking a QB for the sake of taking a QB is not the answer. Lets fill some other areas of need and address the QB of the future next year.

We can't keep putting off drafting a qb. You have no idea who is going to be available in next year's draft. The time to address qb is now.

I'm hoping we get Kaepernick tonight with one of our 2 picks.

Side armed thrower in the NFL? Pass.

CanesSkins26 wrote:

Taking a QB for the sake of taking a QB is not the answer. Lets fill some other areas of need and address the QB of the future next year.

We can't keep putting off drafting a qb. You have no idea who is going to be available in next year's draft. The time to address qb is now.

Thats a matter of opinion.. The time to draft a QB isnt now if there is not a QB that the team values in this draft.. while there may be someone you covet that does not mean that the team agrees and while I covet no one in this draft the team might think they found their guy..

All Im trying to say is that you dont just draft a QB because you feel like the time is now to do so.. its true that there is no way of knowing who will be available next year but to draft a QB in the 2nd round that your not sure can truly be your franchise QB is no way to go about doing business and will leave the team in a repeated cycle of searching for the answer at QB

Countertrey wrote:

CanesSkins26 wrote:

Hankersim from UF or in the 3rd

Frank!!! You're killing me. Hankerson is a Cane, NOT a Gator. That's about as low of an insult as you can say to someone.

Wouldn't worry about it, Frank... most of us can't tell the difference, either... very subtle differences in the structure of the brow ridges, I understand...

I think both of these second round picks need to produce starters. If they use both of them then that's 3 starters (including "Superman"), if they use one and trade down then the 3rd rounder needs to be starting by the bye week.

1niksder wrote:I think both of these second round picks need to produce starters. If they use both of them then that's 3 starters (including "Superman"), if they use one and trade down then the 3rd rounder needs to be starting by the bye week.

That's awfully ambitious, even for good drafting teams.

CanesSkins26 wrote:

1niksder wrote:I think both of these second round picks need to produce starters. If they use both of them then that's 3 starters (including "Superman"), if they use one and trade down then the 3rd rounder needs to be starting by the bye week.

That's awfully ambitious, even for good drafting teams.

It's time the Redskins become a good drafting team.

They have the advantage considering all the holes the have in the starting lineup.

frankcal20 wrote:I wouldn't mind us trading out of our first 2nd round pick and getting a 3rd and another late round pick. I think that Shanny is targeting a QB who may be more of a project type guy like TJ Yates (can't stand Carolina guys) or the kid out of Alabama. I think with our 2nd, we'd pick up Hankersim from UF or in the 3rd, the WR from Hawaii who we had in twice I think for visits. I like the idea of the NG/DT from Hampton. Local kid too which is always nice to have on the team.

I am beginning to think that this is what Shanny is thinking. There might be a lot of folks wanting to trade up for that #41 to get "their guy." I am wondering if the rumors about Shanny wanting Luck next year are true. Look for some future draft choice pick ups here for some Lucky ammo.

WE're not going to be getting a QB

Round 2 under way

1niksder wrote:

CanesSkins26 wrote:

1niksder wrote:I think both of these second round picks need to produce starters. If they use both of them then that's 3 starters (including "Superman"), if they use one and trade down then the 3rd rounder needs to be starting by the bye week.

That's awfully ambitious, even for good drafting teams.

It's time the Redskins become a good drafting team.

They have the advantage considering all the holes the have in the starting lineup.

I AGREE with 1nik

This team NEEDS effective starters. Maybe not the best players at their positions in the NFL, just solid starter material.

Bills took a safety/corner
Bengals take Andy Dalton.

49ers going to steal Mallett from us?

Kapernick to SF

Thank God San Fran saved us from the potential of taking Kapernick.

Yessss!!

3 down, 1 more to go (Arizona)!

If Mallett gets by them he'll likely make it to 41. Then well probably pass on him and really break my heart. If shanahan does want him, he doesn't want him bad enough to trade up apparently.

I would have liked us to take him just so we could have seen your response. Oh wait, 18 pages of BS'ing doesn't sound like fun either.

Wouldn't Bowers be a good pick for Zona? What a defensive hall along with Peterson yesterday. Please no Mallett. This is it... Last hurdle...

funbuncher wrote:Yessss!!

3 down, 1 more to go (Arizona)!

If Mallett gets by them he'll likely make it to 41. Then well probably pass on him and really break my heart. If shanahan does want him, he doesn't want him bad enough to trade up apparently.

They can get him at 49 if he is there at 41

Ryan Williams to AZ. I wanted him to the Skins. Kid is good.

1niksder wrote:

funbuncher wrote:Yessss!!

3 down, 1 more to go (Arizona)!

If Mallett gets by them he'll likely make it to 41. Then well probably pass on him and really break my heart. If shanahan does want him, he doesn't want him bad enough to trade up apparently.

They can get him at 49 if he is there at 41

Oakland at 48, and Denver twice... I don't know aboubthat.