The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era

markshark84 wrote:

emoses14 wrote:

markshark84 wrote:

1niksder wrote:Any way you look at it 'the Danny" still is only one step away from the HC. Bruce needs to be the Prez of Football Ops, and he needs to hire a GM. That would put two people in between "the Danny" and HC

I would like that. Anything to get Danny further away from making football related decisions.

That said -- never gonna happen. Danny, being as narcastic as they come, couldn't do that to himself.

Do we have any actual evidence that he has had anything to do with football operations in the last 3 years to counter the evidence we have that he has not? w/r/t to that evidence, I've not seen him at a signing, heard about him in a negotiation or heard his name in the paper, period. In fact the only time i remember him doing anything in the last 3 years was going to meet RGIII at baylor. And that doesn't seem overly odd for your franchise QB.

"Where is the evidence" is a defense most commonly used by guilty criminals........

Um. . . "where is the evidence?" is the kind of THE question upon which punishment, rehabilitation, liability (for the most part) and obligation is founded in the law. Without evidence, well we're kind of just makin ish up as we go along, right? Its the starting point for a prosecution, a defense, and the trier of fact.

Put another way; if we don't have to come up with evidence to support the words coming out of our mouths and the positions we take aren't we really talking out of our ?

emoses14 wrote:

markshark84 wrote:

emoses14 wrote:

markshark84 wrote:

1niksder wrote:Any way you look at it 'the Danny" still is only one step away from the HC. Bruce needs to be the Prez of Football Ops, and he needs to hire a GM. That would put two people in between "the Danny" and HC

I would like that. Anything to get Danny further away from making football related decisions.

That said -- never gonna happen. Danny, being as narcastic as they come, couldn't do that to himself.

Do we have any actual evidence that he has had anything to do with football operations in the last 3 years to counter the evidence we have that he has not? w/r/t to that evidence, I've not seen him at a signing, heard about him in a negotiation or heard his name in the paper, period. In fact the only time i remember him doing anything in the last 3 years was going to meet RGIII at baylor. And that doesn't seem overly odd for your franchise QB.

"Where is the evidence" is a defense most commonly used by guilty criminals........

Um. . . "where is the evidence?" is the kind of THE question upon which punishment, rehabilitation, liability (for the most part) and obligation is founded in the law. Without evidence, well we're kind of just makin ish up as we go along, right? Its the starting point for a prosecution, a defense, and the trier of fact.

Put another way; if we don't have to come up with evidence to support the words coming out of our mouths and the positions we take aren't we really talking out of our ?

Not sure you really caught what I was saying...... and I'm not going to get in an arguement over the evidentiary process in legal prosecutions --- since this is a REDSKINS forum.....

But "put another way", in my experience -- "where's the evidence" is typically used by guilty criminals that have disposed of it........

markshark84 wrote:

emoses14 wrote:

markshark84 wrote:

1niksder wrote:Any way you look at it 'the Danny" still is only one step away from the HC. Bruce needs to be the Prez of Football Ops, and he needs to hire a GM. That would put two people in between "the Danny" and HC

I would like that. Anything to get Danny further away from making football related decisions.

That said -- never gonna happen. Danny, being as narcastic as they come, couldn't do that to himself.

Do we have any actual evidence that he has had anything to do with football operations in the last 3 years to counter the evidence we have that he has not? w/r/t to that evidence, I've not seen him at a signing, heard about him in a negotiation or heard his name in the paper, period. In fact the only time i remember him doing anything in the last 3 years was going to meet RGIII at baylor. And that doesn't seem overly odd for your franchise QB.

"Where is the evidence" is a defense most commonly used by guilty criminals........

It also comes in handy when you're innocent:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xt05JcJ8Woo

markshark84 wrote:

emoses14 wrote:Do we have any actual evidence that he has had anything to do with football operations in the last 3 years to counter the evidence we have that he has not? w/r/t to that evidence, I've not seen him at a signing, heard about him in a negotiation or heard his name in the paper, period. In fact the only time i remember him doing anything in the last 3 years was going to meet RGIII at baylor. And that doesn't seem overly odd for your franchise QB.

"Where is the evidence" is a defense most commonly used by guilty criminals........

Guilt by association is an attack most commonly used by prosecutors without a case — but more importantly, it's fallacious.

markshark84 wrote:

emoses14 wrote:

markshark84 wrote:

emoses14 wrote:

markshark84 wrote:

1niksder wrote:Any way you look at it 'the Danny" still is only one step away from the HC. Bruce needs to be the Prez of Football Ops, and he needs to hire a GM. That would put two people in between "the Danny" and HC

I would like that. Anything to get Danny further away from making football related decisions.

That said -- never gonna happen. Danny, being as narcastic as they come, couldn't do that to himself.

Do we have any actual evidence that he has had anything to do with football operations in the last 3 years to counter the evidence we have that he has not? w/r/t to that evidence, I've not seen him at a signing, heard about him in a negotiation or heard his name in the paper, period. In fact the only time i remember him doing anything in the last 3 years was going to meet RGIII at baylor. And that doesn't seem overly odd for your franchise QB.

"Where is the evidence" is a defense most commonly used by guilty criminals........

Um. . . "where is the evidence?" is the kind of THE question upon which punishment, rehabilitation, liability (for the most part) and obligation is founded in the law. Without evidence, well we're kind of just makin ish up as we go along, right? Its the starting point for a prosecution, a defense, and the trier of fact.

Put another way; if we don't have to come up with evidence to support the words coming out of our mouths and the positions we take aren't we really talking out of our ?

Not sure you really caught what I was saying...... and I'm not going to get in an arguement over the evidentiary process in legal prosecutions --- since this is a REDSKINS forum.....

But "put another way", in my experience -- "where's the evidence" is typically used by guilty criminals that have disposed of it........

Oh. No, I didn't catch that. Not enough sleep. Fair enough. Nothing to see here, move along.

We all can speculate and discuss what we all feel we have seen and read regarding the front office or lack thereof depending on your point of view. However until we are a fly on the wall for a few days we all really don't know. We can only hope that Snyder finally get's it right.....

there is proof that Snyder has not been involved with things to do with on the field activities

this franchise has a good QB (actually 2) & This franchise is getting better - If Snyder WERE involved that would not have happened

emoses14 wrote:

markshark84 wrote:

emoses14 wrote:

markshark84 wrote:

emoses14 wrote:

markshark84 wrote:

1niksder wrote:Any way you look at it 'the Danny" still is only one step away from the HC. Bruce needs to be the Prez of Football Ops, and he needs to hire a GM. That would put two people in between "the Danny" and HC

I would like that. Anything to get Danny further away from making football related decisions.

That said -- never gonna happen. Danny, being as narcastic as they come, couldn't do that to himself.

Do we have any actual evidence that he has had anything to do with football operations in the last 3 years to counter the evidence we have that he has not? w/r/t to that evidence, I've not seen him at a signing, heard about him in a negotiation or heard his name in the paper, period. In fact the only time i remember him doing anything in the last 3 years was going to meet RGIII at baylor. And that doesn't seem overly odd for your franchise QB.

"Where is the evidence" is a defense most commonly used by guilty criminals........

Um. . . "where is the evidence?" is the kind of THE question upon which punishment, rehabilitation, liability (for the most part) and obligation is founded in the law. Without evidence, well we're kind of just makin ish up as we go along, right? Its the starting point for a prosecution, a defense, and the trier of fact.

Put another way; if we don't have to come up with evidence to support the words coming out of our mouths and the positions we take aren't we really talking out of our ?

Not sure you really caught what I was saying...... and I'm not going to get in an arguement over the evidentiary process in legal prosecutions --- since this is a REDSKINS forum.....

But "put another way", in my experience -- "where's the evidence" is typically used by guilty criminals that have disposed of it........

Oh. No, I didn't catch that. Not enough sleep. Fair enough. Nothing to see here, move along.

I have to agree. I've been one of the biggest Snyder bashers since he fired Marty. But I've seen no reason to think he's still been involved in the football operations.

Dans been doing what most of us fans have wanted: staying out of the way and letting people who know what they're doing do their jobs. Since he's been doing that I've let the past stay in past. He's made some mistakes but, as of right now, he's trying to atone for them and get the team back on track.

emoses14 wrote:

markshark84 wrote:

emoses14 wrote:

markshark84 wrote:

emoses14 wrote:

markshark84 wrote:

1niksder wrote:Any way you look at it 'the Danny" still is only one step away from the HC. Bruce needs to be the Prez of Football Ops, and he needs to hire a GM. That would put two people in between "the Danny" and HC

I would like that. Anything to get Danny further away from making football related decisions.

That said -- never gonna happen. Danny, being as narcastic as they come, couldn't do that to himself.

Do we have any actual evidence that he has had anything to do with football operations in the last 3 years to counter the evidence we have that he has not? w/r/t to that evidence, I've not seen him at a signing, heard about him in a negotiation or heard his name in the paper, period. In fact the only time i remember him doing anything in the last 3 years was going to meet RGIII at baylor. And that doesn't seem overly odd for your franchise QB.

"Where is the evidence" is a defense most commonly used by guilty criminals........

Um. . . "where is the evidence?" is the kind of THE question upon which punishment, rehabilitation, liability (for the most part) and obligation is founded in the law. Without evidence, well we're kind of just makin ish up as we go along, right? Its the starting point for a prosecution, a defense, and the trier of fact.

Put another way; if we don't have to come up with evidence to support the words coming out of our mouths and the positions we take aren't we really talking out of our ?

Not sure you really caught what I was saying...... and I'm not going to get in an arguement over the evidentiary process in legal prosecutions --- since this is a REDSKINS forum.....

But "put another way", in my experience -- "where's the evidence" is typically used by guilty criminals that have disposed of it........

Oh. No, I didn't catch that. Not enough sleep. Fair enough. Nothing to see here, move along.

I have to agree. I've been one of the biggest Snyder bashers since he fired Marty. But I've seen no reason to think he's still been involved in the football operations.

Dans been doing what most of us fans have wanted: staying out of the way and letting people who know what they're doing do their jobs. Since he's been doing that I've let the past stay in past. He's made some mistakes but, as of right now, he's trying to atone for them and get the team back on track.

Snyder SUCKS - The Redskins are doing fine BECAUSE he's NOT involved ... that's a GOOD thing ...