Page 11 of 11
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 4:43 pm
by absinthe1023
Chris Luva Luva wrote:absinthe1023 wrote:Chris Luva Luva wrote:absinthe1023 wrote:Irn-Bru wrote:absinthe1023 wrote:Chris Luva Luva wrote:absinthe1023 wrote:D-U-M dumb.
This post? Yes I agree.
Easy tiger, the quote is from a movie. I wanted to see a FG attempt and a potential 21 pt lead. What's wrong with that?
Being aggressive in that situation is, statistically, the better decision. I liked it as a call even though it didn't work out for us.
In fact I've really liked the Shanahan's tolerance for risk on 4th downs this year. One area where we are on the cutting edge, IMO.
I'm usually a proponent for going for it on 4th and short, but with a chance to create a 21 point lead on a team that hasn't yet scored a TD, you gotta think that a FG (well within Forbath's comfort zone) is the right call. Subsequent events have made this a moot point, thankfully. I was hoping for an edifying response from the first person to respond to my post, I can only presume that it must be hard to post with one's foot in one's mouth.
We have 30+ points. Thus making your crying pointless.
Crying? My face is quite dry, sir. Please don't persist in thinking that your opinion of my posts on a message board makes any impact on either my thoughts or my future actions.
if your going to be consistently negative. Don't cry when it's pointed out.
There's that word again. Here's the thing: you post what you want, I post what I want, and as long as we both stay within the rules, no problem. My only objection (and I won't bother to raise it again), is your unnecessary use of a bait-word as a well-worn and shoddy attempt to get around the "attack the post, not the poster" dictum upon which the site is governed.
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 4:44 pm
by capitaldefense
I am enjoying a Redskins victory. A Redskin team destroying Philly, no matter who is at QB. I want another defensive stop and another TD. Please!
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 4:47 pm
by absinthe1023
It really is great to watch the wheels completely come off another team (especially a division rival) for once.
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 4:48 pm
by Burgundy&Wha?
Running downhill now.
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 4:52 pm
by absinthe1023
Cowboys lead. I actually like them winning today (if they hang on), maybe they'll have a bit of a false sense of security before T-Day.
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 4:55 pm
by Chris Luva Luva
absinthe1023 wrote:Chris Luva Luva wrote:absinthe1023 wrote:Chris Luva Luva wrote:absinthe1023 wrote:Irn-Bru wrote:absinthe1023 wrote:Chris Luva Luva wrote:absinthe1023 wrote:D-U-M dumb.
This post? Yes I agree.
Easy tiger, the quote is from a movie. I wanted to see a FG attempt and a potential 21 pt lead. What's wrong with that?
Being aggressive in that situation is, statistically, the better decision. I liked it as a call even though it didn't work out for us.
In fact I've really liked the Shanahan's tolerance for risk on 4th downs this year. One area where we are on the cutting edge, IMO.
I'm usually a proponent for going for it on 4th and short, but with a chance to create a 21 point lead on a team that hasn't yet scored a TD, you gotta think that a FG (well within Forbath's comfort zone) is the right call. Subsequent events have made this a moot point, thankfully. I was hoping for an edifying response from the first person to respond to my post, I can only presume that it must be hard to post with one's foot in one's mouth.
We have 30+ points. Thus making your crying pointless.
Crying? My face is quite dry, sir. Please don't persist in thinking that your opinion of my posts on a message board makes any impact on either my thoughts or my future actions.
if your going to be consistently negative. Don't cry when it's pointed out.
There's that word again. Here's the thing: you post what you want, I post what I want, and as long as we both stay within the rules, no problem. My only objection (and I won't bother to raise it again), is your unnecessary use of a bait-word as a well-worn and shoddy attempt to get around the "attack the post, not the poster" dictum upon which the site is governed.
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 4:56 pm
by capitaldefense
Chris Luva Luva wrote:absinthe1023 wrote:Chris Luva Luva wrote:absinthe1023 wrote:Chris Luva Luva wrote:absinthe1023 wrote:Irn-Bru wrote:absinthe1023 wrote:Chris Luva Luva wrote:absinthe1023 wrote:D-U-M dumb.
This post? Yes I agree.
Easy tiger, the quote is from a movie. I wanted to see a FG attempt and a potential 21 pt lead. What's wrong with that?
Being aggressive in that situation is, statistically, the better decision. I liked it as a call even though it didn't work out for us.
In fact I've really liked the Shanahan's tolerance for risk on 4th downs this year. One area where we are on the cutting edge, IMO.
I'm usually a proponent for going for it on 4th and short, but with a chance to create a 21 point lead on a team that hasn't yet scored a TD, you gotta think that a FG (well within Forbath's comfort zone) is the right call. Subsequent events have made this a moot point, thankfully. I was hoping for an edifying response from the first person to respond to my post, I can only presume that it must be hard to post with one's foot in one's mouth.
We have 30+ points. Thus making your crying pointless.
Crying? My face is quite dry, sir. Please don't persist in thinking that your opinion of my posts on a message board makes any impact on either my thoughts or my future actions.
if your going to be consistently negative. Don't cry when it's pointed out.
There's that word again. Here's the thing: you post what you want, I post what I want, and as long as we both stay within the rules, no problem. My only objection (and I won't bother to raise it again), is your unnecessary use of a bait-word as a well-worn and shoddy attempt to get around the "attack the post, not the poster" dictum upon which the site is governed.
LMAO
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 4:58 pm
by absinthe1023
Chris Luva Luva wrote:absinthe1023 wrote:Chris Luva Luva wrote:absinthe1023 wrote:Chris Luva Luva wrote:absinthe1023 wrote:Irn-Bru wrote:absinthe1023 wrote:Chris Luva Luva wrote:absinthe1023 wrote:D-U-M dumb.
This post? Yes I agree.
Easy tiger, the quote is from a movie. I wanted to see a FG attempt and a potential 21 pt lead. What's wrong with that?
Being aggressive in that situation is, statistically, the better decision. I liked it as a call even though it didn't work out for us.
In fact I've really liked the Shanahan's tolerance for risk on 4th downs this year. One area where we are on the cutting edge, IMO.
I'm usually a proponent for going for it on 4th and short, but with a chance to create a 21 point lead on a team that hasn't yet scored a TD, you gotta think that a FG (well within Forbath's comfort zone) is the right call. Subsequent events have made this a moot point, thankfully. I was hoping for an edifying response from the first person to respond to my post, I can only presume that it must be hard to post with one's foot in one's mouth.
We have 30+ points. Thus making your crying pointless.
Crying? My face is quite dry, sir. Please don't persist in thinking that your opinion of my posts on a message board makes any impact on either my thoughts or my future actions.
if your going to be consistently negative. Don't cry when it's pointed out.
There's that word again. Here's the thing: you post what you want, I post what I want, and as long as we both stay within the rules, no problem. My only objection (and I won't bother to raise it again), is your unnecessary use of a bait-word as a well-worn and shoddy attempt to get around the "attack the post, not the poster" dictum upon which the site is governed.
Now you've gone and done it. My eyes are finally leaking and I want my bottle, my momma, and my blankie
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 5:00 pm
by capitaldefense
Just joined the board today, maybe I am a lucky charm. HA HA NOT!
Anyway, look forward to more victories and our young team getting better week after week. Also look forward to the Redskins discussions in the future.
Hail!
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 5:02 pm
by absinthe1023
capitaldefense wrote:Just joined the board today, maybe I am a lucky charm. HA HA NOT!
Anyway, look forward to more victories and our young team getting better week after week. Also look forward to the Redskins discussions in the future.
Hail!
You have to do everything EXACTLY as you did them today on each and every game day, or the 'Skins shall lose.
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 5:05 pm
by ferryrich
Well it's definitely been fun watching us this week on the stream and the highlights on redzone haven't caused a feeling of anguish for a change!
(Redzone here is a good way ahead of the stream for the most part)
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 5:07 pm
by absinthe1023
What's the combined # of false start and offsides penalties today? 5?
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 5:11 pm
by 44diesel
Victory formation on 1
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 5:12 pm
by absinthe1023
Only 257 total yards for Philthy, that is impressive no matter who the opposing QB is. Get well soon, Mr. Meriweather.
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 5:12 pm
by Burgundy&Wha?
Cleveland on top of Dallas 20-13 with a minute to go.
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 5:12 pm
by 44diesel
Definitely looking forward to this week's "loser papers"
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 5:13 pm
by emoses14
Did I. . . Did I hear a "We want Dallas!" chant?
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 5:15 pm
by Irn-Bru
Irn-Bru wrote:We take this one. I don't think it will be particularly close, either.
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 5:16 pm
by absinthe1023
Irn-Bru wrote:Irn-Bru wrote:We take this one. I don't think it will be particularly close, either.
Nostradamus?
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 5:21 pm
by absinthe1023
44diesel wrote:Definitely looking forward to this week's "loser papers"
Oh yes indeed
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 5:25 pm
by 1niksder
capitaldefense wrote:Just joined the board today, maybe I am a lucky charm. HA HA NOT!
Anyway, look forward to more victories and our young team getting better week after week. Also look forward to the Redskins discussions in the future.
Hail!
Welcome to the boards.... and you might be
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 5:37 pm
by Kilmer72
absinthe1023 wrote:Chris Luva Luva wrote:absinthe1023 wrote:Chris Luva Luva wrote:absinthe1023 wrote:Irn-Bru wrote:absinthe1023 wrote:Chris Luva Luva wrote:absinthe1023 wrote:D-U-M dumb.
This post? Yes I agree.
Easy tiger, the quote is from a movie. I wanted to see a FG attempt and a potential 21 pt lead. What's wrong with that?
Being aggressive in that situation is, statistically, the better decision. I liked it as a call even though it didn't work out for us.
In fact I've really liked the Shanahan's tolerance for risk on 4th downs this year. One area where we are on the cutting edge, IMO.
I'm usually a proponent for going for it on 4th and short, but with a chance to create a 21 point lead on a team that hasn't yet scored a TD, you gotta think that a FG (well within Forbath's comfort zone) is the right call. Subsequent events have made this a moot point, thankfully. I was hoping for an edifying response from the first person to respond to my post, I can only presume that it must be hard to post with one's foot in one's mouth.
We have 30+ points. Thus making your crying pointless.
Crying? My face is quite dry, sir. Please don't persist in thinking that your opinion of my posts on a message board makes any impact on either my thoughts or my future actions.
if your going to be consistently negative. Don't cry when it's pointed out.
There's that word again. Here's the thing: you post what you want, I post what I want, and as long as we both stay within the rules, no problem. My only objection (and I won't bother to raise it again), is your unnecessary use of a bait-word as a well-worn and shoddy attempt to get around the "attack the post, not the poster" dictum upon which the site is governed.
It just depends on maturity level. I say things almost everyday I wish I didn't. I do apologize though or admit I was wrong which is 99.9999% of the time. You cant let people online get to you like I have in the past. In real life I get respect but when others are behind a keyboard it is hard to command that. Just ignore or patronize.
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 9:38 pm
by Redskin in Canada
Deadskins wrote:Redskin in Canada wrote:No way we lose to Foles.
Might as well be the game which seals Andy's run in Philthy. Last game against an Andy Reid led Philthy team.
Until our second game against the Smeagols. Or are you thinking he get's canned mid-season?
They will wait until the end of this debacle, ooops sorry ... season.
Another DREAM season for them.
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 12:33 am
by Deadskins
Dream Team! DREAM TEAM! DREAM TEAM!