Official Redskins / Cardinals Game Day Thread

Hoss · Post by **Hoss** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:14 pm

unbelievable

tribeofjudah · Post by **tribeofjudah** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:14 pm

OUr D failed us on that one play........

just654 · Post by **just654** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:14 pm

can we get some pressure

grampi · Post by **grampi** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:14 pm

unfricken believeable! Where was our pass rush?

Chris Luva Luva · Post by **Chris Luva Luva** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:14 pm

Wow, our defensive line really looked gassed right there.

The defense caused that on their own. The penalties hurt them bad.

UK Skins Fan · Post by **UK Skins Fan** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:15 pm

UK Skins Fan wrote:It's OK, I'm feeling positive again now.

How long will they let me keep that feeling?

Hmmmm. 10 minutes.

grampi · Post by **grampi** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:15 pm

If you ain't gonna pass rush, then you gotta cover the receivers. They didn't do either.

Hoss · Post by **Hoss** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:16 pm

UK Skins Fan wrote:
UK Skins Fan wrote:It's OK, I'm feeling positive again now.

How long will they let me keep that feeling?
Hmmmm. 10 minutes.

pretty good while it lasted?

CanesSkins26 · Post by **CanesSkins26** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:16 pm

The offense needs to do something here because the D looks tired. We can't afford a 3 and out here.

UK Skins Fan · Post by **UK Skins Fan** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:16 pm

Chris Luva Luva wrote:Wow, our defensive line really looked gassed right there.

The defense caused that on their own. The penalties hurt them bad.

That's why I resist laying all the blame on the offence. You can say that the defence is tired, but the penalties that extended that drive weren't due to tiredness.

Montana Redskin · Post by **Montana Redskin** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:16 pm

that missed xp may come in handy (even though so would a chip shot miss by sweesham)

UK Skins Fan · Post by **UK Skins Fan** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:17 pm

Hoss wrote:
UK Skins Fan wrote:
UK Skins Fan wrote:It's OK, I'm feeling positive again now.

How long will they let me keep that feeling?
Hmmmm. 10 minutes.

pretty good while it lasted?

Positively orgasmic, my friend.

CanesSkins26 · Post by **CanesSkins26** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:17 pm

Betts returning kicks??? I dont know about that idea.

Countertrey · Post by **Countertrey** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:17 pm

grampi wrote:If you ain't gonna pass rush, then you gotta cover the receivers. They didn't do either.

Sounds to me that they covered for about 6 seconds. You can't ask for more than that, and still claim to be reasonable.

Chris Luva Luva · Post by **Chris Luva Luva** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:18 pm

UK Skins Fan wrote:
Chris Luva Luva wrote:Wow, our defensive line really looked gassed right there.

The defense caused that on their own. The penalties hurt them bad.
That's why I resist laying all the blame on the offence. You can say that the defence is tired, but the penalties that extended that drive weren't due to tiredness.

For THAT drive, the issue was on the defense. But for the game OVERALL, the offense is a lame duck.

Montana Redskin · Post by **Montana Redskin** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:18 pm

Betts is fine at KO's ask TB

GSPODS · Post by **GSPODS** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:18 pm

UK Skins Fan wrote:
Hoss wrote:
UK Skins Fan wrote:
UK Skins Fan wrote:It's OK, I'm feeling positive again now.

How long will they let me keep that feeling?
Hmmmm. 10 minutes.

pretty good while it lasted?
Positively orgasmic, my friend.

Not quite that good. No lead is safe with this team.

Chris Luva Luva · Post by **Chris Luva Luva** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:18 pm

Countertrey wrote:
grampi wrote:If you ain't gonna pass rush, then you gotta cover the receivers. They didn't do either.

Sounds to me that they covered for about 6 seconds. You can't ask for more than that, and still claim to be reasonable.

Expecting reasonable posts from some of these people is like....well dont hold your breath.

CanesSkins26 · Post by **CanesSkins26** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:19 pm

Pathetic blocking once again.

Hoss · Post by **Hoss** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:19 pm

sellers got man-handled

grampi · Post by **grampi** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:19 pm

We need a long, time consuming TD drive here.

UK Skins Fan · Post by **UK Skins Fan** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:19 pm

Chris Luva Luva wrote:
UK Skins Fan wrote:
Chris Luva Luva wrote:Wow, our defensive line really looked gassed right there.

The defense caused that on their own. The penalties hurt them bad.
That's why I resist laying all the blame on the offence. You can say that the defence is tired, but the penalties that extended that drive weren't due to tiredness.

For THAT drive, the issue was on the defense. But for the game OVERALL, the offense is a lame duck.

True, true.

brad7686 · Post by **brad7686** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:19 pm

portis=no vision

UK Skins Fan · Post by **UK Skins Fan** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:20 pm

GSPODS wrote:
UK Skins Fan wrote:
Hoss wrote:
UK Skins Fan wrote:
UK Skins Fan wrote:It's OK, I'm feeling positive again now.

How long will they let me keep that feeling?
Hmmmm. 10 minutes.

pretty good while it lasted?
Positively orgasmic, my friend.

Not quite that good. No lead is safe with this team.

I stand by my comment. It's a pain/pleasure thing.

Hoss · Post by **Hoss** » Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:20 pm

looks like our d will get a chance to redeem themselves again very soon.