Page 2 of 2

Re: Doctson

Posted: Fri May 03, 2019 9:57 am
by Burgundy&GoldForever
DEHog wrote:That's kind of mentality that breeds mediocrity IMO. It's what the Skins were famous for in the past. You don't pay or extend players who haven't produced! Let's be honest here, Doctson career numbers are equal to a down year for Antonio Brown, "IF" he has a breakout year (stop me if you've heard that before) it will be because the Skins made this move!
This is where I am. I look at perpetually successful teams like New England and Pittsburgh and they don't pay anyone out of fear they might lose a player who develops after he is gone. There has to be some rhyme or reason to that philosophy.

Re: Doctson

Posted: Fri May 03, 2019 10:31 am
by DEHog
^^^^ =D> ^^^^

Re: Doctson

Posted: Fri May 03, 2019 11:56 am
by cowboykillerzRGiii
To that point... They let people who DO perform walk... And fill the need with a cheaper alternative nearly every year

Re: Doctson

Posted: Fri May 03, 2019 12:54 pm
by riggofan
DEHog wrote:That's kind of mentality that breeds mediocrity IMO. It's what the Skins were famous for in the past. You don't pay or extend players who haven't produced! Let's be honest here, Doctson career numbers are equal to a down year for Antonio Brown, "IF" he has a breakout year (stop me if you've heard that before) it will be because the Skins made this move!
Yeah man, I don't really disagree with anything you're saying. But just getting rid of Josh Doctson isn't really a plan. "I hope Simms will be good" isn't a plan. I know we've drafted some guys and we have a few guys in the pipeline, but its all just kind hopeful right now. I guess my question for everyone here is: who is the WR on this roster right now that we know for sure is better than Docston? He was our leading WR last year (sorry if anybody threw up in their mouth reading that!)

The thing that has bred mediocrity here is not developing our players the way we should. Just watch. We're always more than willing to grab somebody else's failed pick off the scrap heap, overpay him and say, "Yeah maybe we'll get more out of this guy". We're super quick to cut bait on our own draft picks. And not getting that fifth year out of a 1st round pick is a failure.

I'm just conversing here btw. Not really butt hurt that they didn't extend him. I get the sense that he's a "McCloughan pick" that they're not especially attached to.

Weird btw how many of those 2015 first rounders aren't being extended to the 5th year. Feels like I've seen a bunch.

Re: Doctson

Posted: Fri May 03, 2019 1:24 pm
by Burgundy&GoldForever
riggofan wrote:
DEHog wrote:That's kind of mentality that breeds mediocrity IMO. It's what the Skins were famous for in the past. You don't pay or extend players who haven't produced! Let's be honest here, Doctson career numbers are equal to a down year for Antonio Brown, "IF" he has a breakout year (stop me if you've heard that before) it will be because the Skins made this move!
Yeah man, I don't really disagree with anything you're saying. But just getting rid of Josh Doctson isn't really a plan. "I hope Simms will be good" isn't a plan. I know we've drafted some guys and we have a few guys in the pipeline, but its all just kind hopeful right now. I guess my question for everyone here is: who is the WR on this roster right now that we know for sure is better than Docston? He was our leading WR last year (sorry if anybody threw up in their mouth reading that!)

The thing that has bred mediocrity here is not developing our players the way we should. Just watch. We're always more than willing to grab somebody else's failed pick off the scrap heap, overpay him and say, "Yeah maybe we'll get more out of this guy". We're super quick to cut bait on our own draft picks. And not getting that fifth year out of a 1st round pick is a failure.

I'm just conversing here btw. Not really butt hurt that they didn't extend him. I get the sense that he's a "McCloughan pick" that they're not especially attached to.

Weird btw how many of those 2015 first rounders aren't being extended to the 5th year. Feels like I've seen a bunch.
Not to beat a dead horse but we'd have to come up about three steps to reach "awful" at drafting receivers. Whatever it is this team evaluates when they draft receivers it's the wrong thing(s).

Re: Doctson

Posted: Sun May 05, 2019 12:10 pm
by welch
Good decision to refuse the 5th year option. Doctson has been a nothing very season. Aside from Doctson's constant injuries, Boswell kept mentioning that Doctson does not run a route, or, at best, does not run his routes accurately. The 78 targets in a "good" year indicate that Doctson often is not where the QB expects him to be. He has been useless.

Re: Doctson

Posted: Sun May 05, 2019 12:12 pm
by welch
Almost forgot: good to see Justice Hog return. Maybe a good-sense draft has lifted everyone's feeling? A reasonable optimism returning after dismal years?

HTTR

Re: Doctson

Posted: Sun May 05, 2019 2:51 pm
by Burgundy&GoldForever
welch wrote:Almost forgot: good to see Justice Hog return. Maybe a good-sense draft has lifted everyone's feeling? A reasonable optimism returning after dismal years?

HTTR
It would definitely be nice to see some of the old guard drop by but I've been hesitant to reach out to most of them. Unfortunately people move on with their lives and sometimes that means having no time for THN. :(

I, for one, miss the cup and straw.

Re: Doctson

Posted: Mon May 06, 2019 7:56 am
by DEHog
cowboykillerzRGiii wrote:To that point... They let people who DO perform walk... And fill the need with a cheaper alternative nearly every year
Who?

Re: Doctson

Posted: Mon May 06, 2019 9:52 am
by cowboykillerzRGiii
DEHog wrote:
cowboykillerzRGiii wrote:To that point... They let people who DO perform walk... And fill the need with a cheaper alternative nearly every year
Who?
The Patriots.

Or do you want names?

Re: Doctson

Posted: Mon May 06, 2019 10:11 am
by DEHog
cowboykillerzRGiii wrote:
DEHog wrote:
cowboykillerzRGiii wrote:To that point... They let people who DO perform walk... And fill the need with a cheaper alternative nearly every year
Who?
The Patriots.

Or do you want names?
I will freely admin that other teams develop better than us, but who have the Skins cut recently that have become perennial pro bowlers?

Re: Doctson

Posted: Mon May 06, 2019 10:56 am
by riggofan
DEHog wrote:I will freely admin that other teams develop better than us, but who have the Skins cut recently that have become perennial pro bowlers?
Kinda the opposite. Cousins, Spencer Long, Trent Murphy, Bashad Breeland, Matt Jones, Ryan Grant... all guys we let go. Not sure any of them excelled elsewhere yet and a couple of them were just completely done.

Re: Doctson

Posted: Mon May 06, 2019 11:03 am
by DEHog
riggofan wrote:
DEHog wrote:I will freely admin that other teams develop better than us, but who have the Skins cut recently that have become perennial pro bowlers?
Kinda the opposite. Cousins, Spencer Long, Trent Murphy, Bashad Breeland, Matt Jones, Ryan Grant... all guys we let go. Not sure any of them excelled elsewhere yet and a couple of them were just completely done.
Yep, and how many pro bowlers have come here and...

Re: Doctson

Posted: Mon May 06, 2019 2:02 pm
by DarthMonk
Never quite understood switching picks with Houston. They then took Fuller and we got Achilles Man.

:(