Page 2 of 2
Re: But why??
Posted: Mon Oct 23, 2017 10:38 am
by riggofan
riggofan wrote:StorminMormon86 wrote:Beathard looked pretty good yesterday. If he plays the remainder of the season like he did yesterday, SF won't need a QB.
True. I wonder how many times though a rookie or backup QB has come off the bench and surprised every one for a single game then completely failed once coaches have tape on him? We'll see if he's legit or not.
This has to be one of the most common stories in the NFL:
A step back: 49ers routed by Cowboys in Beathard’s first start
http://www.sfgate.com/49ers/article/A-s ... 297793.php
Went from a 57.6 QBR in that surprise work vs. the Skins to a 21.6 QBR the next week in his first start. None of this to say he might not be a decent QB in the long run. Just so common to see this situation with a backup or a rookie.
Re: But why??
Posted: Mon Oct 23, 2017 2:21 pm
by SkinsJock
riggofan wrote:riggofan wrote:StorminMormon86 wrote:Beathard looked pretty good yesterday. If he plays the remainder of the season like he did yesterday, SF won't need a QB.
True. I wonder how many times though a rookie or backup QB has come off the bench and surprised every one for a single game then completely failed once coaches have tape on him? We'll see if he's legit or not.
This has to be one of the most common stories in the NFL:
A step back: 49ers routed by Cowboys in Beathard’s first start
Went from a 57.6 QBR in that surprise work vs. the Skins to a 21.6 QBR the next week in his first start. None of this to say he might not be a decent QB in the long run. Just so common to see this situation with a backup or a rookie.
there have been a number of bad games by QBs this season
and we have seen some good coaching from both new HCs and new coordinators