The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era

Deadskins wrote:

DarthMonk wrote:^^^ on the razor ... The notion that anyone other than Dems were behind this is every bit as simple as the idea that Dems were behind it.

Plenty of republicans detest Trump.

Please! There's no need to try and use logic here. When women accuse Bill Clinton of sexual misconduct, it's proof his wife is a scumbag, but when women accuse Trump of sexual misconduct, it's also proof that Hillary is a scumbag. It's Ockham's Razor, dude!

Countertrey wrote:The video evidence that the Hillary Campaign was setting up violence at Trump rallies provides a bit of validity to the postulation that Occam's Razor applies, here...

SkinsJock wrote:anyone with any sense at all knows that the DNC would have been behind this - there's no doubt that they would have instructed their people to instigate while appearing to be 'peaceful', knowing full well the anger that most Trump supporters have built up against the way things have been managed here by the government over the past 8 years

Deadskins wrote:

SkinsJock wrote:anyone with any sense at all knows that the DNC would have been behind this - there's no doubt that they would have instructed their people to instigate while appearing to be 'peaceful', knowing full well the anger that most Trump supporters have built up against the way things have been managed here by the government over the past 8 years

So it's OK to violently attack someone for wearing a Planned Parenthood T-shirt because of "the way things have been managed here by the government over the past 8 years?"

SkinsJock wrote:

Deadskins wrote:

SkinsJock wrote:anyone with any sense at all knows that the DNC would have been behind this - there's no doubt that they would have instructed their people to instigate while appearing to be 'peaceful', knowing full well the anger that most Trump supporters have built up against the way things have been managed here by the government over the past 8 years

So it's OK to violently attack someone for wearing a Planned Parenthood T-shirt because of "the way things have been managed here by the government over the past 8 years?"

you love to make things up - it's how you are

some people will do anything to get what they want - waving a red flag at a bull get's a response - if you don't like what is almost certainly going to happen, don't put yourself in that position in the first place - these people were trying to get the response they got in order to make the other side look bad for doing what the 'instigators' wanted in the first place

going to a Trump rally and making it obvious that you don't like what he represents is most likely getting a violent response

many people in this country are sick and tired of being lied to by scum like the Clintons

DarthMonk wrote:I guess Occam's razor applies just as it does to the simple explanations for why Trump might lose:

Massive voter fraud is being conducted by Democrats who will bus undocumented immigrants and people posing as people who have died to battleground states to vote illegally. This will happen on a very large scale on the order of tens of thousands in order to ensure Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Florida go the right way. Hence the need for new types of ID and poll watchers.

Countertrey wrote:So, when an employed member of Clinton's campaign is videoed providing instruction on how to provoke violence at Trump rallies, that's just more speculation... LOL

For the most part the video focuses on Scott Foval, who is identified as the national field director at Americans United for Change, a liberal organization. He was a subcontractor working for Democracy Partners, a consulting firm founded by Robert Creamer (who is also featured in the video). Democracy Partners did work for the Democratic National Committee.

Foval is recorded as saying:

• "If you’re there and you’re protesting and you do these actions, you will be attacked at Trump rallies. That’s what we want. The whole point of it is, we know Trump’s people will freak the (expletive) out, the security team will freak out, and his supporters will lose their (expletive)."

• "There’s a script. There’s a script of engagement. Sometimes the crazies bite, and the crazies don’t bite."

• "The key is initiating the conflict by having leading conversations with people who are naturally psychotic. I mean honestly, it is not hard to get some of these (expletive) to pop off. It’s a matter of showing up, to want to get in the rally in a Planned Parenthood T-shirt. Or Trump is a Nazi. You can message to draw them out and message them to punch you."

SkinsJock wrote:Many of the people who will vote for Trump are not Trump 'supporters', they just do not want to have a lying scumbag as President

Deadskins wrote:

SkinsJock wrote:Many of the people who will vote for Trump are not Trump 'supporters', they just do not want to have a lying scumbag as President

Then you shouldn't vote for Trump either. PolitiFact rates over 71% of every word that comes out of his mouth as being in their "pants on fire" category. The man is a pathological liar. I guess either vote Libertarian, Green, write in, or not at all if you are that averse to liars.

SkinsJock wrote:Many of the people who will vote for Trump are not Trump 'supporters', they just do not want to have a lying scumbag as President

count me in the group that does not want Trump to win the election but I will not vote for HRC

Deadskins wrote:I'm sure you'd be even more horrified by Trump campaign emails, if only the Russians didn't have a Manchurian Candidate in this race.

SkinsJock wrote:time for some to eat crow - big time