Page 2 of 2

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 1:38 am
by Deadskins
fredp45 wrote:I would wonder--- why would the Browns "give him away" for a 2nd...they can't get a #1 WR with that pick?

There's some issue(s) with this guy. I know the Browns aren't the greatest organization, but they aren't giving away a stud, the guy has a wart or two...

Keep the pick.

Um, Trent Richardson.

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 2:35 pm
by Countertrey
Deadskins wrote:
fredp45 wrote:I would wonder--- why would the Browns "give him away" for a 2nd...they can't get a #1 WR with that pick?

There's some issue(s) with this guy. I know the Browns aren't the greatest organization, but they aren't giving away a stud, the guy has a wart or two...

Keep the pick.

Um, Trent Richardson.
Um... they got a first rounder for him... not exactly giving him away.

Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2013 5:31 pm
by Deadskins
Countertrey wrote:
Deadskins wrote:
fredp45 wrote:I would wonder--- why would the Browns "give him away" for a 2nd...they can't get a #1 WR with that pick?

There's some issue(s) with this guy. I know the Browns aren't the greatest organization, but they aren't giving away a stud, the guy has a wart or two...

Keep the pick.

Um, Trent Richardson.
Um... they got a first rounder for him... not exactly giving him away.

True, but considering what they gave up for him, a low first rounder is still kind of giving him away.

Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 3:19 pm
by markshark84
Deadskins wrote:
Countertrey wrote:
Deadskins wrote:
fredp45 wrote:I would wonder--- why would the Browns "give him away" for a 2nd...they can't get a #1 WR with that pick?

There's some issue(s) with this guy. I know the Browns aren't the greatest organization, but they aren't giving away a stud, the guy has a wart or two...

Keep the pick.

Um, Trent Richardson.
Um... they got a first rounder for him... not exactly giving him away.

True, but considering what they gave up for him, a low first rounder is still kind of giving him away.


Honestly, if I were CLE I would have made that trade. TRich is a decent RB, but not a top tier RB. He avgs. 3.5 ypc over his career. When it comes to value and draft picks -- a late 1st rounder is a pretty good deal for CLE.

Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 9:08 pm
by fredp45
3.5 yards with Cleveland's offense is like 4.5 on many teams...they have NO qb, they have few weapons and defenses know that so they make sure they have a plan in place to stop him.

I think he will do very well with Luck as defenses can't focus on him.

Posted: Thu Oct 17, 2013 3:32 pm
by markshark84
fredp45 wrote:3.5 yards with Cleveland's offense is like 4.5 on many teams...they have NO qb, they have few weapons and defenses know that so they make sure they have a plan in place to stop him.

I think he will do very well with Luck as defenses can't focus on him.


3.5 ypc in CLE..................

3.1 ypc in Indy.................

Not really 4.5 on a team that has TONS of offensive weapons. Meanwhile:
- Bradshaw: 4.5 ypc in 41 attempts
- Brown: 7.8 ypc in 22 attempts
- Ballard: 4.8 ypc in 13 attempts

Then there's:
- Richardson: 3.1 ypc in 61 attempts --- and 1/3 of all his attempts were against Jacksonville!!!!

Is this what you call "very well"........ :hmm:

Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2013 5:13 pm
by gregory smith
Redskins trying to trade Fred. Hmm...


What an asinine thought.

Posted: Wed Oct 23, 2013 10:11 pm
by fredp45
Markshark84

really...you're all ready assessing how good T Rich is in Indy's offense? He just got to Indy, give him time.

Let him have time with their Oline, their offensive scheme...

Re:

Posted: Sat Nov 09, 2013 11:36 pm
by Countertrey
gregory smith wrote:Redskins trying to trade Fred. Hmm...


What an asinine thought.

So... how's this going?