The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era

Deadskins wrote:

1niksder wrote:It's easier to cut Hall than it is to cut Biggers than Hall

To clarify, which is easier to cut?

Biggers has a cap hit of $1.5M and Hall's cap hit is $250,000 less however cutting Hall would free up his $1M base salary with $250K in dead money or a savings of $750K on the cap. Cutting Biggers would only free up $635K in base and carry $365K in dead money or a net savings of only $270K.

So if you needed cap space it would be easier to cut Hall and gain $480K more in cap space than if you cut Biggers. Same if you only have one roster spot and their performance in TC is equal.

1niksder wrote:Biggers has a cap hit of $1.5M and Hall's cap hit is $250,000 less however cutting Hall would free up his $1M base salary with $250K in dead money or a savings of $750K on the cap. Cutting Biggers would only free up $635K in base and carry $365K in dead money or a net savings of only $270K.

So if you needed cap space it would be easier to cut Hall and gain $480K more in cap space than if you cut Biggers. Same if you only have one roster spot and their performance in TC is equal.

After reading this over like 7 x's, I'm still like...

I'll just watch on gameday and hope for the best

langleyparkjoe wrote:

1niksder wrote:Biggers has a cap hit of $1.5M and Hall's cap hit is $250,000 less however cutting Hall would free up his $1M base salary with $250K in dead money or a savings of $750K on the cap. Cutting Biggers would only free up $635K in base and carry $365K in dead money or a net savings of only $270K.

So if you needed cap space it would be easier to cut Hall and gain $480K more in cap space than if you cut Biggers. Same if you only have one roster spot and their performance in TC is equal.

After reading this over like 7 x's, I'm still like...

I'll just watch on gameday and hope for the best

Might be the half mil roster bonus in Biggers deal that's not in Hall's

EVERYONE LOOK, UK'S CHANGED HIS SIGNATURE!!!

Redskins are still $30,000 under the cap. Keep the change, Mara.

langleyparkjoe wrote:EVERYONE LOOK, UK'S CHANGED HIS SIGNATURE!!!

The Hogster wrote:Redskins are still $30,000 under the cap. Keep the change, Mara.

The Hogster wrote:Redskins are still $30,000 under the cap. Keep the change, Mara.

In both of our wins against them this year, I want to score 36 points and then take a knee for the rest of the game

emoses14 wrote:

The Hogster wrote:Redskins are still $30,000 under the cap. Keep the change, Mara.

In both of our wins against them this year, I want to score 36 points and then take a knee for the rest of the game

36? That's it???

langleyparkjoe wrote:

emoses14 wrote:

The Hogster wrote:Redskins are still $30,000 under the cap. Keep the change, Mara.

In both of our wins against them this year, I want to score 36 points and then take a knee for the rest of the game

36? That's it???

Yes, exactly 36. Alternatively, we could beat them by exactly 36, but that might be a little hard to do.

But 36 is the key.