Page 2 of 2

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 10:43 pm
by SkinsJock
It really does not matter to me what Sally Jenkins write - I don't read TRASH

If she said the sun rose in the East, that would be fine - I cannot refute what I don't read :lol:

Posted: Wed Jan 09, 2013 11:59 pm
by Hooligan
Redskin in Canada wrote:I only have ONE question:

Who are the posters who voted YES in the Poll?

Show yourselves. :twisted:


I voted YES to the general idea that the coach mis-handled an injured QB.

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 8:45 am
by DaSkinz Baby
RayNAustin wrote:
SkinsJock wrote:I'm sure there's a lot of people that 'share' Sally Jenkins views

I'm not sure what you're trying to get at here ..

anyone that shares Sally Jenkins 'views' and admits to it, is just as stupid and brain dead as she is

not saying you are lpj, but anyone else that does is for sure VERY STUPID

:twisted:


So, if dumb ole sally said the sun would rise in the eastern sky tomorrow morning ... you'd be the first genius to disagree?

Let me put on my sunglasses ... you're blinding brilliance is greater than the Western Sunrise, and too much for my eyes :lol:


HA HA Blew coffee thank you... :lol:

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 8:49 am
by DaSkinz Baby
Whether Sally Jenkins is a hack or not is up to interpretation, people refusing to read a very well written article to me is crazy regardless whether past articles wasn't of their liking. Hell many authors have written many books many I didn't like but I won't stop reading because I didn't like other ones. But to each his own, but I still don't understand certain people on this board that pretty much scan certain posts and make comments that really don't show your smart but pretty much a hater on all levels. It's like the guys that hated jocks in High School because they were popular and got the good looking looking girls. I mean I don't know but it seems to me on a message board there are many different views, I tend to think you attract more flies with honey than vinegar but hey again, to each his own......

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 9:22 am
by langleyparkjoe
[quote="DaSkinz Baby"][/quote]

Just hate to use extra space while others read DSB so I just showed your name but I agree as well.

I mean, you guys NOT reading the article actually doesn't even bother me so much but if that's the case how bout you just skip over the post and stop wasting space... "I don't read trash".. "I stopped reading her stuff years ago".

Well gee thanks, so how about you don't vote and don't waste my work time that I'm using so I can have my "fix" of THN? :lol:

NYFSF said "Hard to argue her reason.".. Which leads me back to my original posting about how you couldn't pay her to dog the Shanahans this year but she put her personal fetish aside and basically voiced what we feel (if you're a Skins fan you feel this way and if you don't I question you).

Joe out. 8)

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 9:31 am
by DaSkinz Baby
langleyparkjoe wrote:
DaSkinz Baby wrote:


Just hate to use extra space while others read DSB so I just showed your name but I agree as well.

I mean, you guys NOT reading the article actually doesn't even bother me so much but if that's the case how bout you just skip over the post and stop wasting space... "I don't read trash".. "I stopped reading her stuff years ago".

Well gee thanks, so how about you don't vote and don't waste my work time that I'm using so I can have my "fix" of THN? :lol:

NYFSF said "Hard to argue her reason.".. Which leads me back to my original posting about how you couldn't pay her to dog the Shanahans this year but she put her personal fetish aside and basically voiced what we feel (if you're a Skins fan you feel this way and if you don't I question you).

Joe out. 8)


+1

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 10:32 am
by SkinsJock
why would anyone 'vote' on a poll that has ZERO credibility?

I do not normally look at Sally Jenkins articles anymore but I did this time ONLY because it looked as though it had been both linked and posted and I wanted to 'check'

Reading the article just confirmed my thoughts about this stupid girl - she is NOT a reporter - she's a gossip monger

AGAIN .... WHY would you even go to the poll here?

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 10:35 am
by langleyparkjoe
SkinsJock wrote:AGAIN .... WHY would you even go to the poll here?


Same reason you're here posting in this thread about a poll you wouldn't vote on maybe? :hmm:

:lol:

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 11:12 am
by SkinsJock
^^ OK

I'm sure I'll read another Sally Jenkins article in the far off future and I'm sure I'll feel the same then

no worries

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 11:14 am
by langleyparkjoe
SkinsJock wrote:^^ OK

I'm sure I'll read another Sally Jenkins article in the far off future and I'm sure I'll feel the same then

no worries


Man i'm just messing with you bro.. Sally can go eat a fat hotdog for all I care. :lol:

I'm more loyal to fellow Skins fans than journalists who live in NY and write for the Washington Post. :lol:

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 12:42 pm
by StorminMormon86
I voted yes. Don't really like her as a "journalist" from what I've read previously, but there isn't anything in the article that can easily be refuted. The team did jeopardize his future by keeping him in, even after the Ngata hit. Anyone who thinks otherwise is delusional.

Posted: Thu Jan 10, 2013 12:48 pm
by DaSkinz Baby
StorminMormon86 wrote:I voted yes. Don't really like her as a "journalist" from what I've read previously, but there isn't anything in the article that can easily be refuted. The team did jeopardize his future by keeping him in, even after the Ngata hit. Anyone who thinks otherwise is delusional.


+1 trillion :shock: