Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2012 7:13 am
Not that I know much about the colts cap situation, but didn't they free up loads with Manning off the books, while we got hit with the Mara penalty? And we were already up at the limit.
Washington football community discussions spanning the Redskins to Commanders era. 20+ years of game analysis, player discussions, and fan perspectives.
https://the-hogs.net/messageboard/
Red_One43 wrote:^ Responding to all of the above^
Pat Angerer missed first 5 games of the season andhas been hobbled when playing.
Robert Mathis has missed 3 games this season
Dwight Freeney has missed 2 games and only has 2 sacks on the season. He is slowed by a an ankle injury.Colts CB Vontae Davis (knee) has been ruled out for Week 10.Davis has appeared in two games since Week 3, playing start to finish in just one of those contests. He's out indefinitely with no timetable to return.Colts LE Cory Redding (knee) has been ruled out for Week 7 against the Browns.The Indy defense is severely banged up. Also ruled out are DTs Fili Moala (knee) and Martin Tevaseu (ankle), OLB Robert Mathis (knee), and CB Darius Butler (shoulder). Inside linebacker Pat Angerer (foot) is listed as questionable. Trent Richardson could have a field day against the league's No. 29 rush defense
Of the five guys TimSkin mentioned, 4 have missed games and Freeney is not having a Freeney season because he is a linebacker this year. Look at the last quote. "Indy D is severely banged up." Yet they still perform good enough to win.
AND Get this - the Colts are transitioning from a 4-3 to a 3-4. According to Haz, it takes 3 years to reach respectability. The Colts, by no means a good defense, have at least played well enough to let the offense win some games.
Talk about their soft schedule all you guys want, they still only gave up 327 yards to the Vikes ( a common opponent) while the Skins gave up 421 to the Vikes.
Talk about their inspired play for their coach? Well that is definitely an indictment againt Shanny and Haz because you are saying that the Skins D cannot get inpired by their coaches and the fact that they now have an offense.
I disagree with that indictment. The Skins D has been playing its hearts out, but when you are playing hard in a scheme that does not fit your talent level, it becomes evident that your effort are futile.
Colts 6-3!
Yes, the comparison is relevant!
Now, even Darrell Green and Charles Mann have joined in to say that it isn't just about the talent. This is a coaching issue. A misuse of the talent on this team by a coaching staff hell bent on fitting players to a scheme.
TimSkin wrote:Red_One43 wrote:^ Responding to all of the above^
Pat Angerer missed first 5 games of the season andhas been hobbled when playing.
Robert Mathis has missed 3 games this season
Dwight Freeney has missed 2 games and only has 2 sacks on the season. He is slowed by a an ankle injury.Colts CB Vontae Davis (knee) has been ruled out for Week 10.Davis has appeared in two games since Week 3, playing start to finish in just one of those contests. He's out indefinitely with no timetable to return.Colts LE Cory Redding (knee) has been ruled out for Week 7 against the Browns.The Indy defense is severely banged up. Also ruled out are DTs Fili Moala (knee) and Martin Tevaseu (ankle), OLB Robert Mathis (knee), and CB Darius Butler (shoulder). Inside linebacker Pat Angerer (foot) is listed as questionable. Trent Richardson could have a field day against the league's No. 29 rush defense
Of the five guys TimSkin mentioned, 4 have missed games and Freeney is not having a Freeney season because he is a linebacker this year. Look at the last quote. "Indy D is severely banged up." Yet they still perform good enough to win.
AND Get this - the Colts are transitioning from a 4-3 to a 3-4. According to Haz, it takes 3 years to reach respectability. The Colts, by no means a good defense, have at least played well enough to let the offense win some games.
Talk about their soft schedule all you guys want, they still only gave up 327 yards to the Vikes ( a common opponent) while the Skins gave up 421 to the Vikes.
Talk about their inspired play for their coach? Well that is definitely an indictment againt Shanny and Haz because you are saying that the Skins D cannot get inpired by their coaches and the fact that they now have an offense.
I disagree with that indictment. The Skins D has been playing its hearts out, but when you are playing hard in a scheme that does not fit your talent level, it becomes evident that your effort are futile.
Colts 6-3!
Yes, the comparison is relevant!
Now, even Darrell Green and Charles Mann have joined in to say that it isn't just about the talent. This is a coaching issue. A misuse of the talent on this team by a coaching staff hell bent on fitting players to a scheme.
I was just making the point that there are a few more important pieces remaining on the Colts team from the past besides Wayne than what DaSkinz says even if they aren't having the best year.
The thing that surprised me about the Colts with that 6-3 record was before Thursdays game they had only forced 3 TOs all year and they are 15th in total yards on D but they are still getting it done somehow. We need to start getting it done especially on D.....somehow.
Mann and Green also said this can very easily be fixed so lets see if Haz and Co. can actually do SOMETHING during the bye so we can atleast slow down other teams.
Red_One43 wrote:TimSkin wrote:Red_One43 wrote:^ Responding to all of the above^
Pat Angerer missed first 5 games of the season andhas been hobbled when playing.
Robert Mathis has missed 3 games this season
Dwight Freeney has missed 2 games and only has 2 sacks on the season. He is slowed by a an ankle injury.Colts CB Vontae Davis (knee) has been ruled out for Week 10.Davis has appeared in two games since Week 3, playing start to finish in just one of those contests. He's out indefinitely with no timetable to return.Colts LE Cory Redding (knee) has been ruled out for Week 7 against the Browns.The Indy defense is severely banged up. Also ruled out are DTs Fili Moala (knee) and Martin Tevaseu (ankle), OLB Robert Mathis (knee), and CB Darius Butler (shoulder). Inside linebacker Pat Angerer (foot) is listed as questionable. Trent Richardson could have a field day against the league's No. 29 rush defense
Of the five guys TimSkin mentioned, 4 have missed games and Freeney is not having a Freeney season because he is a linebacker this year. Look at the last quote. "Indy D is severely banged up." Yet they still perform good enough to win.
AND Get this - the Colts are transitioning from a 4-3 to a 3-4. According to Haz, it takes 3 years to reach respectability. The Colts, by no means a good defense, have at least played well enough to let the offense win some games.
Talk about their soft schedule all you guys want, they still only gave up 327 yards to the Vikes ( a common opponent) while the Skins gave up 421 to the Vikes.
Talk about their inspired play for their coach? Well that is definitely an indictment againt Shanny and Haz because you are saying that the Skins D cannot get inpired by their coaches and the fact that they now have an offense.
I disagree with that indictment. The Skins D has been playing its hearts out, but when you are playing hard in a scheme that does not fit your talent level, it becomes evident that your effort are futile.
Colts 6-3!
Yes, the comparison is relevant!
Now, even Darrell Green and Charles Mann have joined in to say that it isn't just about the talent. This is a coaching issue. A misuse of the talent on this team by a coaching staff hell bent on fitting players to a scheme.
I was just making the point that there are a few more important pieces remaining on the Colts team from the past besides Wayne than what DaSkinz says even if they aren't having the best year.
The thing that surprised me about the Colts with that 6-3 record was before Thursdays game they had only forced 3 TOs all year and they are 15th in total yards on D but they are still getting it done somehow. We need to start getting it done especially on D.....somehow.
Mann and Green also said this can very easily be fixed so lets see if Haz and Co. can actually do SOMETHING during the bye so we can atleast slow down other teams.
Ok, I get your point and that my point is different. What I read DaSkinz saying that the excuses for Shanny and Co need to stop. I agree. I admit that I was one of the folk making excuses for them for the first two years. It is evident that this is a coaching problem and a personnel decision problem (Shanny problem) as to why we are 3-6. The Colts D has been devastated by injuries this year and are in transition and as you noted, they only had three turnovers before Thursday night, but yet somehow they still get the job done. No comparison is exact, but Colts had cap issues, lockout issues just like the Skins, but yet, they still play better D than the Skins.
Like everybody else, I hope that Shanny and Co. make the right adjustments to get this thing back on track. I am optimistic that we can play better defense. Not great defense, but at least mid range D which should be good enough to win a majority of the remaining game. We showed that we could beat the Giants for 59 minutes with what we were doing, so the capability is there like Green and Mann are saying.
RayNAustin wrote:Deadskins wrote:DaSkinz Baby wrote:Example the Colts look at them last year versus this year.
Please! The Colts situation has already been discussed. Last year was an aberration because they didn't have Manning. Other than last season, their worst record over the last five seasons was 10-6. This is hardly a rebuilding team. Add to that, they play in the AFC South (12 games against AFC opponents), the emotional lift from playing for a coach sidelined with Leukemia, our injuries to key players on defense, and the Mara cap hit, and the comparison is ludicrous.
That's just not true at all ... the Colts CLEANED HOUSE at the end of last season ... players, coaches, and the front office! They did everything but take the horseshoe off their helmets ... and all the analysts were in agreement about how much better a situation RG3 was going to have with the Redskins, than Luck was going to have with the Colts who were just beginning a full scale rebuild this year.
If we can't beat CLEVELAND...Deadskins wrote:The Danny should do again. Our only remaining game where we might not have a real chance of winning is against the Ravens, and with Ray Lewis out, I'm not even sure about that one. You have to let this season play out before making any coaching changes. I've never been a fan of Shanahan's, but I'm willing to stay the course for now.
Deadskins wrote:Red_One43 wrote:Talk about their inspired play for their coach? Well that is definitely an indictment againt Shanny and Haz because you are saying that the Skins D cannot get inpired by their coaches and the fact that they now have an offense.
If you can't see the difference, then you are blind.
Deadskins wrote:RayNAustin wrote:Deadskins wrote:DaSkinz Baby wrote:Example the Colts look at them last year versus this year.
Please! The Colts situation has already been discussed. Last year was an aberration because they didn't have Manning. Other than last season, their worst record over the last five seasons was 10-6. This is hardly a rebuilding team. Add to that, they play in the AFC South (12 games against AFC opponents), the emotional lift from playing for a coach sidelined with Leukemia, our injuries to key players on defense, and the Mara cap hit, and the comparison is ludicrous.
That's just not true at all ... the Colts CLEANED HOUSE at the end of last season ... players, coaches, and the front office! They did everything but take the horseshoe off their helmets ... and all the analysts were in agreement about how much better a situation RG3 was going to have with the Redskins, than Luck was going to have with the Colts who were just beginning a full scale rebuild this year.
Wow Ray, I can't believe you're using "the analysts" to back your argument. Those are the same analysts who also say Shanny is a great coach, and that Luck is the more pro-ready QB. And you totally ignored the other three factors I pointed to for the disparity in records between the teams. I tend to agree with a lot of your points, but to fire a coach mid-season is not something The Danny should do again. Our only remaining game where we might not have a real chance of winning is against the Ravens, and with Ray Lewis out, I'm not even sure about that one. You have to let this season play out before making any coaching changes. I've never been a fan of Shanahan's, but I'm willing to stay the course for now.
TimSkin wrote:We need to just stop making excuses buckle down and start KICKING SOME A$$!!!
RayNAustin wrote:So I don't see the reasonableness or the logic in this rather blatant double standard, with people calling for the public execution of Zorn by the end of his first year, year and a half ... for failing to be successful playing someone else's hand with a clueless QB and a broken Clinton Portis ... while Shanahan gets a pass for failing to be successful with the hand he personally chose, including a phenomenal QB like RG3, and a remarkable RB like Alfred Morris.
But that's because I'm just dumb.![]()
RayNAustin wrote:Deadskins wrote:RayNAustin wrote:Deadskins wrote:DaSkinz Baby wrote:Example the Colts look at them last year versus this year.
Please! The Colts situation has already been discussed. Last year was an aberration because they didn't have Manning. Other than last season, their worst record over the last five seasons was 10-6. This is hardly a rebuilding team. Add to that, they play in the AFC South (12 games against AFC opponents), the emotional lift from playing for a coach sidelined with Leukemia, our injuries to key players on defense, and the Mara cap hit, and the comparison is ludicrous.
That's just not true at all ... the Colts CLEANED HOUSE at the end of last season ... players, coaches, and the front office! They did everything but take the horseshoe off their helmets ... and all the analysts were in agreement about how much better a situation RG3 was going to have with the Redskins, than Luck was going to have with the Colts who were just beginning a full scale rebuild this year.
Wow Ray, I can't believe you're using "the analysts" to back your argument. Those are the same analysts who also say Shanny is a great coach, and that Luck is the more pro-ready QB. And you totally ignored the other three factors I pointed to for the disparity in records between the teams. I tend to agree with a lot of your points, but to fire a coach mid-season is not something The Danny should do again. Our only remaining game where we might not have a real chance of winning is against the Ravens, and with Ray Lewis out, I'm not even sure about that one. You have to let this season play out before making any coaching changes. I've never been a fan of Shanahan's, but I'm willing to stay the course for now.
Look, I understand that you represent the more popular opinion here, and and that makes mine the odd opinion out, and subject to ridicule. That's fine .. I'm used to it ... and I'm also used to being right more often than not, in the final equation. And I'm right this time for sure .. because what is happening now, happened in year 1 and year 2 and has not changed at all for the better.
RayNAustin wrote:So I don't see the reasonableness or the logic in this rather blatant double standard, with people calling for the public execution of Zorn by the end of his first year, year and a half
The Hogster wrote:Maybe I'm cranky, but I'm getting annoyed reading the word 'Shanny' Until he wins with us, he doesn't deserve an abbreviation, nickname or whatever.
He's just Mike
Deadskins wrote:The Hogster wrote:Maybe I'm cranky, but I'm getting annoyed reading the word 'Shanny' Until he wins with us, he doesn't deserve an abbreviation, nickname or whatever.
He's just Mike
I don't think it's a complimentary nickname.
Shanahan has just hit the midpoint of his five-year, $35 million contract. His team is 3-6 this season, 14-27 during his tenure in Washington, and he hasn't taken a team to the playoffs since the 2005 Denver Broncos.
Riding a three-game losing streak, the Redskins entered their bye week still in rebuilding mode - even as they've watched other franchises trend from worst to respectable on a speedier timetable.
In fairness, Shanahan inherited a mess. The Redskins had become dysfunctional with Vinny Cerrato running the front office, and Jim Zorn looked overwhelmed as a head coach.
"I didn't think we'd have a whole new football team going into my third year," Shanahan said. "That's a little unusual."
Only 12 players on the current 53-man roster pre-date Shanahan's arrival.
"We were an older football team," he said. "We didn't have a lot of draft choices, and when you don't have a lot of players, and you don't have depth through the draft, and you cut all those old players, that means you're starting over again. And that's what we did - we started over again."
Shanahan also notes that each of his three Redskins offseasons has been hindered by unusual circumstances. There was a smaller free-agent pool in 2010 because of the rules in place in the uncapped final year of the collective bargaining agreement.
The 2011 offseason was thrown askew by the lockout, and in 2012 the Redskins learned with little notice before the start of free agency that they were being docked $18 million in salary-cap money this year and next because of overspending during the uncapped year.
"Obviously, that's very strong, when you talk about $36 million," Shanahan said. "And you find out 10 minutes before free agency starts. You plan something for 2-1/2 years and you find out 10 minutes through the newspaper that you just got hit with $36 million."
Still,he wasted a year trying to get Donovan McNabb to fit into his system, then staked his reputation on the duo of Rex Grossman and John Beck. He hit the jackpot this year by getting into position to take Heisman Trophy winner Griffin.
But Griffin looks like one of the first pieces of the rebuilding puzzle. The Redskins' list of needs runs the gauntlet: cornerback, safety, linebacker, receiver, right tackle.
"I think when you look at the NFL, some instances where you say third year of a program, third year of a head coach, you would like to see the team starting to settle," linebacker London Fletcher said.
From the day he arrived, Shanahan has been all about control. He has final say over the roster. He demands discipline. He's installed rules and restrictions never before seen at Redskins Park.
Shanahan says he's seen "tremendous strides" with the team and that he has it going "in the right direction."
oj wrote:The subject suggested the lack of success is 'incomplete roster' and that we are still going thru a rebuilding phase.
A problem with that thinking (incomplete roster) is that it is an excuse not an explanation. My presumption is that you can win with ANY combination of draftees - ANY of those guys that get drafted are potential starters in the right situation. It is the coaches responsibility to create the right siituation so that his player can dominate. If the coach fails to create those situations then the team will be mediocre.
It is obvious that some players have greater talents and if you get 52 of the best players on a single team then you don't need a coach do you!
What i see is a disconnect in the coaching, the Shanahans come across as too clinical and cerebral - i have never, ever seen either of them fire up the team. A pat on the helmut saying 'good job' while not even looking the player in the eye is pathetic.
I think the Shanahans are wicked smart but are emotional drains on our team. When was the last time you saw either of them just smile for the hell of it.
SkinsJock wrote:RayNAustin wrote:So now let me explain you why I REALLY feel the way I do .... it's a matter of principles, and honesty and integrity and personal responsibility, and standing for something ..... things that used to be considered all important qualities because you are quite frankly NOTHING without these things. /
UNFORTUNATELY Ray - Of the 'qualities' you deem so important. please give us just 1 - I repeat one (1) that we all would agree Dan Snyder has - JUST ONE