Romney's opps.

Wanna talk about politics, your favorite hockey team... vegetarian recipes?
KazooSkinsFan
kazoo
kazoo
Posts: 10293
youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2004 4:00 pm
Location: Kazmania

Post by KazooSkinsFan »

cowboykillerzRGiii wrote:Michael Moore is a douche... Romney is ignorant even beyond George W. Obama is the lesser of the evils, and my vote would go to Gary Johnson if I thought he had a fighting chance. Paul would have been my republican candidate of choice but flip flop Romney won over the "intellectual" crowd. Now that's a first putting Romney and intellectual in the same sentence!
I am
Pro choice, indifferent on gay marriage, for taxing millionaires, for separation of church and state, for legalizing marijuana, against playing big brother/anti war (but understand that's a pipe dream), but most of all prefer a leader that isn't a complete moron. I don't care about Romney's tax returns or Obamas religion. I care about giving the lower middle class a chance to climb out of the debt and succeed. I support small businesses and want big corporations to keep jobs in America.

Saying I hate Romney but don't know why is unfounded... I'm just not rich enough to buy a $60,000 plate to make it to one of his dinners. No president is perfect, but I'm part of the 48% that Mitt thinks will never try to provide for my family. If he was Hispanic he still wouldn't get any Hispanic votes. He's a fool, i don't hate fools I pity the fool 8)


With all the government needs to destroy wealth envy, you'd vote libertarian if they had a chance? In what possible universe does that make sense? I am a libertarian, I haven't voted Republican since 1988, but with the Marxist in Chief I will vote for Romney in 1 1/2 months without flinching. But while you have some agreement with libertarians, trust me, you fundamentally aren't one.

If you ever discover capitalism, which is just the word for economic freedom, give us a call. But we need people who actually support our cause, not people who just support dope smoking. Everyone would be richer in our system. But everyone wouldn't achieve the same level of wealth.

Winston Churchill: The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings. The inherent virtue of Socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.

That is the path you go down with your blast the rich campaign. It's just so preposterous that by not attacking the rich, we are giving them the money. They get the money by giving everyone else the jobs and then they can invest as well and earn more. You can not like reality, but that is reality.
Hail to the Redskins!

Groucho: Man does not control his own fate. The women in his life do that for him

Twain: A man who carries a cat by the tail learns something he can learn in no other way
crazyhorse1
ch1
ch1
Posts: 3634
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 9:01 pm
Location: virginia beach

Post by crazyhorse1 »

KazooSkinsFan wrote:
cowboykillerzRGiii wrote:Michael Moore is a douche... Romney is ignorant even beyond George W. Obama is the lesser of the evils, and my vote would go to Gary Johnson if I thought he had a fighting chance. Paul would have been my republican candidate of choice but flip flop Romney won over the "intellectual" crowd. Now that's a first putting Romney and intellectual in the same sentence!
I am
Pro choice, indifferent on gay marriage, for taxing millionaires, for separation of church and state, for legalizing marijuana, against playing big brother/anti war (but understand that's a pipe dream), but most of all prefer a leader that isn't a complete moron. I don't care about Romney's tax returns or Obamas religion. I care about giving the lower middle class a chance to climb out of the debt and succeed. I support small businesses and want big corporations to keep jobs in America.

Saying I hate Romney but don't know why is unfounded... I'm just not rich enough to buy a $60,000 plate to make it to one of his dinners. No president is perfect, but I'm part of the 48% that Mitt thinks will never try to provide for my family. If he was Hispanic he still wouldn't get any Hispanic votes. He's a fool, i don't hate fools I pity the fool 8)


With all the government needs to destroy wealth envy, you'd vote libertarian if they had a chance? In what possible universe does that make sense? I am a libertarian, I haven't voted Republican since 1988, but with the Marxist in Chief I will vote for Romney in 1 1/2 months without flinching. But while you have some agreement with libertarians, trust me, you fundamentally aren't one.

If you ever discover capitalism, which is just the word for economic freedom, give us a call. But we need people who actually support our cause, not people who just support dope smoking. Everyone would be richer in our system. But everyone wouldn't achieve the same level of wealth.

Winston Churchill: The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings. The inherent virtue of Socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.

That is the path you go down with your blast the rich campaign. It's just so preposterous that by not attacking the rich, we are giving them the money. They get the money by giving everyone else the jobs and then they can invest as well and earn more. You can not like reality, but that is reality.


The current rich are totally expendable. What is important are workers and the market itself. If there's money in the market, there will always be those who will take advantage of it...without need of tax breaks and political power.
Let's give real capitalists a chance by getting rid of the leeches who think they should own everything and be able to buy the government.
Post Reply