Posted: Tue Aug 21, 2012 6:13 pm
Red_One43 wrote:cleg wrote:The Colts needed Luck to play that much because they have terrible fans and need to show the fan based what Luck can do or no one will come to their games. I have lived a lot of places and those fans are the worst - I still believe that most of them that were not born in the Manning era are actually latent Cowboy fans. When I lived in Indiana in the early '90s their games were never on TV because no one went there. I went to a Redskins game in 1993 or 94 and the stadium was mostly empty but for the Redskins fans. Now that Manning is gone these frauds need to be shown that Luck can play before they will stop dreaming of Troy, Emmitt and Irvin again.Red_One43 wrote:1niksder wrote:Mississippiskinsfan2 wrote:C/ATT YDS AVG TD INT
RG3 4/6 70 11.7 1 0
Ryan Tannehill 14/21 167 8.0 1 0
Andrew Luck 10/16 188 11.8 2 0
All 3 of the top rookie QB looked good in their first game so not sure what you can really take from that though. Just want to see more good games from RG3
Looks like they needed longer looks at Tannehill and Luck than the Skins needed to see of RGIII. They both threw more passes than Griff took snaps. The Skins know what they have and what they want to see.
I like the way Shanny is handling RGIII. He is throwing everything at him and then giving him just enough in the first couple of preseason games to put what he learned into live games. Since preseason games are so vanilla, I get why practice is harder.
I get why Tannehill played more, he was said to need more seasoning at the QB position.
I don't get why the Clolts think that Luck needed to play that much in that first preseason game.
Thanks, that clears that up for me.
I've read similar stuff on Colt message boards. They say the vast majority were Manning bandwagoners who are now Luck bandwangoner wannabees. They exist in all cities but the boards there say they are in the majority there.
DarthMonk