Page 2 of 2
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2012 2:35 pm
by Mississippiskinsfan2
riggofan wrote:Redskin in Canada wrote:People want him as "backup" and then hope he never plays. Why? Might as well save the roster spot for somebody with a future. God knows we need to develop some other positions. Enough is enough, I say keep Grossman for training camp but only if Cousins does not live up to the Draft expectations at this time.
I'm completely with you man. I don't expect the Skins to get anything in a trade for Rex, but there may be some tough decisions to make getting the roster down to 53. Maybe by letting Rex go, you get to hang on to one of those young players.
Everybody seems to be ok with RGIII learning on the job this year. Why not take your lumps with developing Cousins at the same time?
+1
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2012 2:55 pm
by SkinsJock
This is really a no brainer - Grossman is ONLY here to help the other 2 to get ready to play
there is NO reason to get rid of him ..... yet
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2012 3:14 pm
by Red_One43
Redskin in Canada wrote:Red_One43 wrote:1. If Grossman is our first guy off the bench, you might get any combination of those 4 quarters - you never know, but the probability is higher that you get the 3rd and the 4th more than than 1st and 2nd.
You "might"???
You will!!!
LMAO!
"You will" is definitely more accurate!
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2012 6:00 pm
by Irn-Bru
1niksder wrote:The drafting of RGIII and Cousins kind of says the future starts now. Grossman will be here ONE more year MAX.
I could see him hanging on a 2nd and 3rd year, especially if he brings much value in a quasi-coaching role. I suspect that's not Rex's strength, though.
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2012 8:53 pm
by the poster
riggofan wrote:Redskin in Canada wrote:
Everybody seems to be ok with RGIII learning on the job this year.
especially the Rams.
Why not take your lumps with developing Cousins at the same time?
because that doesn't happen, that's why. no veteran head coach , who is paid millions of dollars, to make a football team entertain a football teams customers for 8 Sunday's a year is going to "just take his lumps"
owner: so why don't we have an experienced backup now that the starter is hurt?
coach: well, were just gonna take our lumps this year boss. like last year. and the year before. by the way, when do I get paid?
if you don't think so, I'll be willing to bet you 2,000 bucks right now that grossman is the backup, provided he's healthy, on week one?
serious bets only.
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2012 10:04 pm
by skinpride1
Well it could be worse right now and our Q.B. camp could look like this.....
http://www.mysanantonio.com/sports/cowb ... 622479.php
Posted: Mon Jul 23, 2012 11:32 pm
by the poster
the browns suck. who cares about them.
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 12:00 am
by skinpride1
the poster wrote:
the browns suck. who cares about them.
Glad you could admit your favorite team blows and you switching to the skins... hell yea.
How it feel to have a bigger PHYSCO around ....that will be me.
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 12:05 am
by the poster
skinpride1 wrote:
Glad you could admit your favorite team blows and you switching to the skins... hell yea.
hmm...nope, I cant agree with you. seems like it is you with the preoccupation of the cleveland team which suggests you're the browns fan or the ex browns fan now switching to washington.
interesting stuff.
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 12:14 am
by skinpride1
the poster wrote:skinpride1 wrote:
Glad you could admit your favorite team blows and you switching to the skins... hell yea.
hmm...nope, I cant agree with you. seems like it is you with the preoccupation of the cleveland team which suggests you're the browns fan or the ex browns fan now switching to washington.
interesting stuff.
THEN YOU LOOKED IN THE MIRROR..... what a minute that's really me.
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 12:17 am
by Irn-Bru
Reminder: Please keep things on topic. Addressing the person (and not the post) is considered a personal attack and not permitted outside the Smack Forum.
(Some here on THN might also suggest that the most effective means for dealing with trolling is to ignore it, pointing to the increase in trolling attempts that correlate with the attention such posts receive. But I leave that matter to individual THN board members who can decide how to react for themselves.)
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 12:38 am
by skinpride1
ok ...I tone it down. You know the poster is not bringing any good to the board. Yes i see the ignore part but when it doesnt work at all... it should be obvious that this dude is not going to leave.
Free debate I can see but again it should be obvious that is not his plan.
Just my thoughts.
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 2:13 am
by cowboykillerzRGiii
*doodet
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 6:08 pm
by emoses14
I'm positive I started this thread about Kirk Cousins to discuss him and his back up role to RGIII, hell even vis a vis Sex Cannon is cool with me, when did we degenerate to talking about the browns and responding to off topic posters?
Posted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 11:45 pm
by 1niksder
skinpride1 wrote:ok ...I tone it down. You know the poster is not bringing any good to the board. Yes i see the ignore part but when it doesnt work at all... it should be obvious that this dude is not going to leave.
Free debate I can see but again it should be obvious that is not his plan.
Just my thoughts.
You should have just stayed on topic...
The topic being Kirk Cousins... and we all know he's better than any QB on the Brownies roster
Posted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 3:49 am
by Countertrey
skinpride1 wrote:
Free debate I can see but again it should be obvious that is not his plan.
