Every year we Redskin fans think that somebody's going to be wildly better than his record. This year it's Morgan. He was a good college receiver at Tech, not a great one: was drafted late (6th round); has a history of injury; and has never had a good year statistically or been able to avoid spending a good deal of time on the bench. Also, he was a cheap pickup because nobody wanted to pay him much. It's true it's said by a few that he has potential, but what does that mean? Next to nada, Armstrong has potential, and so do all of our receivers, some of whom will wind up on the practice squad. But, who am I to pop balloons, dream on.skinsfan#33 wrote:See I don't care what they run on a track in shorts. Morgan's much higher y/c ave says he is a bigger play threat than Garcon or Moss.The Hogster wrote:They both run 4.4. It seems as if we envision Garçon as the big play/deep threat WR. Santana is faster than both of them, if he can still run 4.3. Big 'if' tho.skinsfan#33 wrote: That is why it would make more sense to have the faster Morgan at X, but since he is a better blocker it makes more sense to have him on the strong side.
And keep on thinking that Alexander is a super player. It makes me chuckle. If he weren't versatile, he couldn't make the team. He's on the bench much of the game for a reason. Not saying I don't like the guy; it's just that he's not good enough to be a starter and still wouldn't be even if he spent all his time trying to master one position