DeAngelo Hall Thinks the Redskins Should Cut Him
-
- ---
- Posts: 18887
- youtube meble na wymiar Warszawa
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 1:55 pm
- Location: AJT
- Contact:
- 1niksder
- **********
- Posts: 16741
- Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 2:45 pm
- Location: If I knew ... it would explain a lot but I've seen Homerville on a map, that wasn't helpful at all
- Contact:
Chris Luva Luva wrote:Everyone is so eager to let him go, with NOBODY TO REPLACE HIM. We need more depth at QB and ur gonna let Hall walk?
Try to resign him for a more reasonable sum, if he balks let him walk. But we're too thin across the board to be THAT arrogant.
Hall is already signed for next year. He's not going anywhere
..__..
{o,o}
|)__)
-"-"-
When you reach the end of your rope, tie a knot in it and hold on....
If the world didn't suck we'd all fall off
{o,o}
|)__)
-"-"-
When you reach the end of your rope, tie a knot in it and hold on....
If the world didn't suck we'd all fall off
-
- ---
- Posts: 18887
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 1:55 pm
- Location: AJT
- Contact:
1niksder wrote:Chris Luva Luva wrote:Everyone is so eager to let him go, with NOBODY TO REPLACE HIM. We need more depth at QB and ur gonna let Hall walk?
Try to resign him for a more reasonable sum, if he balks let him walk. But we're too thin across the board to be THAT arrogant.
Hall is already signed for next year. He's not going anywhere
Yikes, I thought I read earlier in the thread that...hmmm...nvm.
The road to the number 1 pick gaining speed!
1niksder wrote:PAPDOG67 wrote:I know most of you would disagree, but I would actually entertain trade offers for Landry.
He'll be a free agent after this season... can't trade him
I really doubt that they let him go AND ... he'll be here for a few more years

Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance
Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
Hall is just frustrated with his game and how the team is doing
The secondary will be fine when the front seven get it together ... AND they will - next year
The secondary will be fine when the front seven get it together ... AND they will - next year
Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance
Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
- StorminMormon86
- Hog
- Posts: 2368
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 6:23 pm
- Location: Pasadena, MD
-
- **LPJ**
- Posts: 6714
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 10:12 am
- Location: Langley Park, MD *Tick Tock*
- Contact:
- StorminMormon86
- Hog
- Posts: 2368
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 6:23 pm
- Location: Pasadena, MD
-
- **LPJ**
- Posts: 6714
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 10:12 am
- Location: Langley Park, MD *Tick Tock*
- Contact:
langleyparkjoe wrote:I say we cut the equipment manager.. its been his fault the whole time and no one realized it!!!!

I agree the secondary has been disapointing guys but this defense has not played well OR been well managed by Haslett
I know that we all expected more but I think with a few more additions and with an offense that puts some points on the board and makes the opponents have to play from behind, we'll see a much better performance from everyone
that's my theory and I'm sticking to it

Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance
Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
PAPDOG67 wrote:Smithian wrote:Landry probably has multiple pro bowls in his first few years with his new team if we're dumb enough to let him go.
Because he's made so many with us in his first 5 years.
He was playing out of position for some of that time because we didn't have anyone else. Hard to judge a SS playing FS all that time. Last year he proved he could play SS a a very high level until he got hurt. If he isn't going to already, I say rest him until next year.
-
- tribe
- Posts: 7075
- Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 11:02 pm
- Location: SURF CITY, HB, CALI *** Occasionally flying into a SUPERNOVA
Re: DeAngelo Hall Thinks the Redskins Should Cut Him
Redskin in Canada wrote:Red_One43 wrote:
Redskins cornerback DeAngelo Hall gave up a 24-yard Dez Bryant touchdown in the first quarter of today’s loss to the Cowboys, and a crucial 26-yard Bryant catch in overtime was Hall’s fault, too. Afterward a dejected Hall said the Redskins would be better off without him.
I ONLY have ONE question:
Who was the stupid idiot who left Hall cover Dez Bryant one-on-one in the most critical play of the game to get a 1st down in the drive that won them the game???
Sure Hall played one of the worst games of his career BUT we all knew he could not cover Bryant alone!!!
Where were the safeties???
We need a top CB. Forget the crap of Carlos. He did not want to stay here. But Hall cannot come back with that salary. He is an opportunistic player not a reliable down to down CB. A nickel role would not be a bad idea indeed.
Too many holes guys, too many to be competitive and aspire to get a winning record (or even a 8 - 8 )
That's it, I have to eat CROW now:
I had hoped for an 8 - 8 season. No more.
I am just hoping to give a chance to some new players and try others at various positions. There is NOTHING to lose now.
Mike said during the presser today, that Hall was in double coverage on Dez and Hall slipped which is what Hall said. Mike added that the pass rush did not help on that play.
PAPDOG67 wrote:Nickel CB would not be a good idea as they usually are required to cover the slot man to man....something we know Hall cannot do. He's better off in zone. I say cut him after this season. He'd be good in a Tampa 2 type defense, but ask him to cover man to man and he's useless.
Yeah, you're right nickel is not for Hall. Cover 2 is probably the best fit for him. We ran the cover 2 against Philly the first game last year and I assume that Hall had a big game on that day.
tribeofjudah wrote:WE NEED CORNERS THAT CAN COVER LIGHTS OUT....LIKE A THICK BLANKET
The secondary here right now can do that - when the guys up front apply the pressure
a good secondary is only as good as the front 7 - always was and always will be

Until recently, Snyder & Allen have made a lot of really bad decisions - nobody with any sense believes this franchise will get better under their guidance
Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
Snyder's W/L record = 45% (80-96) - Snyder/Allen = 41% (59-84-1)
Kilmer72 wrote:PAPDOG67 wrote:Smithian wrote:Landry probably has multiple pro bowls in his first few years with his new team if we're dumb enough to let him go.
Because he's made so many with us in his first 5 years.
He was playing out of position for some of that time because we didn't have anyone else. Hard to judge a SS playing FS all that time. Last year he proved he could play SS a a very high level until he got hurt. If he isn't going to already, I say rest him until next year.
The guy has 4 INTs in 5 years with us. Eventually you have to make plays in my book if you want to be considered elite without the numbers to back it up.
- StorminMormon86
- Hog
- Posts: 2368
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 6:23 pm
- Location: Pasadena, MD
-
- tribe
- Posts: 7075
- Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 11:02 pm
- Location: SURF CITY, HB, CALI *** Occasionally flying into a SUPERNOVA
langleyparkjoe wrote:I say we cut the equipment manager.. its been his fault the whole time and no one realized it!!!!
agreed.......they can't get their footing on the field. HALL slipping and falling and not able to "cover" his man.... LOL

Proverbs 27:17 As iron sharpens iron,
so one person sharpens another.
so one person sharpens another.
-
- ---
- Posts: 18887
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 1:55 pm
- Location: AJT
- Contact:
Re: DeAngelo Hall Thinks the Redskins Should Cut Him
Red_One43 wrote:Mike said during the presser today, that Hall was in double coverage on Dez and Hall slipped which is what Hall said. Mike added that the pass rush did not help on that play.
Thank U, I can't count how many times I stated that in the gameday thread.
Question for you guys. A LOT of the same people calling for Halls head, also complain about Orakpo... Now, being that people are complaining about these two guys, one would ASSUME that they'd be able to connect the dots. Excuse me for expecting too much lololol.
The pass rush is VERY INCONSISTENT. Rak's limited moves to the QB are killing us. The lack of a LEGIT NT isn't helping the situation. We could use Jenkin's help right now.
Hall isn't the best but U know wut. I watch DB's on ALL teams get burned every week. Sure, it happens to us at some bad times but we gotta get those guys some help.
The road to the number 1 pick gaining speed!
-
- Hog
- Posts: 2370
- Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2005 11:56 am
I think Hall's attitude is outstanding ... the guy's got pride but he's not put his own ego ahead of the team or his on field play. That's a guy you can expect to work hard to step up his performance, and we all know he's got ball hawk capability.
Also, both plays made on him by Bryant were actually made by Romo buying time and let's face it, in this day and age, the receivers have the advantage, particularly in that type of situation. Bryant has some outstanding ball skills, and is the Cowboy's best receiver playing right now. So I really can't put all of this on Hall's back. Yes, he got beat .. he also had a good receiver to cover for more time than than Romo should have had to throw the ball.
What I think was the killer was the career long ball to Witten who was wide open and never got touched all the way into the end zone. How can that happen?
At the end of the day, I still say that you can't be invisible on offense for the entire first half of games, and expect your defense to not be a little gassed in the 4th Q.
Also, both plays made on him by Bryant were actually made by Romo buying time and let's face it, in this day and age, the receivers have the advantage, particularly in that type of situation. Bryant has some outstanding ball skills, and is the Cowboy's best receiver playing right now. So I really can't put all of this on Hall's back. Yes, he got beat .. he also had a good receiver to cover for more time than than Romo should have had to throw the ball.
What I think was the killer was the career long ball to Witten who was wide open and never got touched all the way into the end zone. How can that happen?
At the end of the day, I still say that you can't be invisible on offense for the entire first half of games, and expect your defense to not be a little gassed in the 4th Q.
The play to Witten still has me wondering. If my memory serves me correctly, Gomes was in on that play and my guess is he was Gomes responsibility. Watcing Hall try to chase Witten down, took the heat off of Gomes' or whoever's responsibility it was.
Hall trying to run Witten down probably made a lot of fans think that he was the man who got beat on that play.
Hall trying to run Witten down probably made a lot of fans think that he was the man who got beat on that play.
- StorminMormon86
- Hog
- Posts: 2368
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 6:23 pm
- Location: Pasadena, MD