Page 2 of 2

Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2011 11:09 am
by PulpExposure
Interesting read at ESPN from the NFC East blogger.

When I spoke with Mike Shanahan in training camp, we talked about a lot of things, and during that discussion I asked him to guess which topic was the one on which I got the most Redskins-related questions. "Quarterback," he said without hesitating, and when I told him he was correct he went on to explain that quarterback was basically the least of his concerns on offense. He believed that Rex Grossman and John Beck were each perfectly capable of running his offense as long as the group he assembled around them took care of their business. He was more concerned about making sure the offensive line and the run game and the receivers were as good as they needed to be.

Well, through the first four games, they were. The line was outstanding. The run game fell in line. Tim Hightower was as advertised, if not as a pure runner then surely as an asset in the passing game. Grossman could look shaky, but he was getting the job done, and most importantly, he wasn't being counted on to win games by himself. That was the plan, and it was working.

Then, Kory Lichtensteiger and Trent Williams got injured, forcing a shakeup on the line and exposing the Redskins' lack of depth there. Then, Hightower, Chris Cooley and Santana Moss got injured, depriving the offense of three key blocking assets. And now, with Beck at quarterback, we see what has become of the offense now that the group around the signal-caller is not as strong as it needs to be. Beck couldn't do a thing Sunday, and a large part of the reason for that was because he had no time to do anything. The Redskins aren't blocking anyone right now, even a little bit, and everything works off of that. Get on the defense all you want, but the fact is they're being asked to do way too much. The offense needs to possess and control and move the ball at least a little bit in order for the Redskins to have a chance, and right now it doesn't because it can't.

Can it get better? Sure. Williams eventually will be back, and Moss further down the road. There remains talent in the running back corps that could be deployed if they could get out in front in one of these games. And as is the case whenever change comes to any offensive line, things will get better the longer the new guys play next to each other. I don't see the Redskins losing the rest of their games, as some are suggesting it appears they will. I believe they can improve on offense, if only because this has to be rock bottom right now, doesn't it?

This isn't about Beck or Grossman or what kind of offensive coordinator Kyle Shanahan is. Right now, the problem with the Redskins is that they don't have enough good players on offense. Some of the reason for that is the injuries, and some is the fact that they weren't ultra-deep or ultra-talented on that side of the ball to begin with. They prioritized defense last offseason and I believe they intend to prioritize offense in the next one. But the result of all of this right now is that, as an overall offense, they're just not very good. This is what worried Mike Shanahan far more in training camp than quarterback did, and it appears his concerns were accurately directed.


It's all about the o-line. And from what's represented above, Shanahan knew this was a possibility. This past offseason we worked to fix up that horrific defense from last year. And it's quite a lot better. Next offseason, they work on fixing the offense, which has been a disaster for years.

We all knew this was going to take time.

Russ Penman wrote:That same excuse get's old, we are missing only one lineman


Trent Williams + Kory Lichtensteiger = 1 lineman?

Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2011 12:03 pm
by Irn-Bru
PulpExposure wrote:
Russ Penman wrote:That same excuse get's old, we are missing only one lineman


Trent Williams + Kory Lichtensteiger = 1 lineman?


And didn't we shift a player or two as we brought in the replacements? This starting five is much different than what we started the season with.

Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2011 12:09 pm
by Irn-Bru
PulpExposure wrote:url=http://espn.go.com/blog/nfceast/post/_/id/32099/and-about-those-redskins]Interesting read[/url] at ESPN from the NFC East blogger.


That is very interesting. Some people will probably interpret Shanahan's remarks as an endorsement of Grossman/Beck, and think he's delusional. I think what it means is that Shanahan looked at the talent pool on the roster, in FA, and in the draft, and decided to stick with a couple of mediocre guys (rather than reach for a slightly better option) and continue focusing on building the offense.

If that's the case, then we are still on the early side in Shanahan's rebuilding plan. Of course, looking at the product on the field, anyone could tell you that there's a long way to go . . .

Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2011 12:13 pm
by Irn-Bru
Russ Penman wrote:
KazooSkinsFan wrote:The reign of the bashers goes on!

I'm not sure why I seem to be the only one who keeps bringing up that our team, particularly on O, was mostly on the sidelines. It was reserves and replacements who got hammered. That actually is material information.

Hmm...when we had our starters we were 3-1. When they were going out one after the other we went 0-3. Clearly that has little to do with it...


That same excuse get's old, we are missing only one lineman and Locklear has played just as good if not better than Trent, losing Cooley? Sorry he wasn't that much of a difference than what Logan Paulsen is currently doing. Moss and Hightower, okay I can see a small drop off but not that much. There are NO INJURED PLAYERS ON DEFENSE! So that TO ME means that Haslett and his play calling has GOTTEN WORSE, face it he SUCKS! FIRE HIM AND KYLE!!! and that OFFENSIVE LINE COACH WHO SUCKS TOO!


ROTFALMAO

Good stuff. If you had just showed me that paragraph, I would have guessed it was someone on THN impersonating a ridiculous position.

But I'll take an unintentionally funny rant, too. Thanks for the laugh break.