Page 2 of 2
Re: Hall praises the team, rips Haynesworth
Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2011 2:51 pm
by skinsfan#33
In bru,
This site list all credibility for me when I looked ast how it had Moss and
ey ranked. It had
ey as something like the 40th best TE in the league and Moss around the 60th.
Just absurd!!!
Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2011 3:09 pm
by SkinsJock
Thanks FFA
I like this
Washington passed on the chance to sign high-profile players in free agency and instead pursued role players willing to sacrifice for the greater good. Shanahan repeatedly has stressed that this year, the Redskins’ roster comprises hungry, high-character players.
the 2 QBs are a BIG issue for Mike (& Kyle) BUT they did not think that any of the QBs in the draft were worth all that much and are waiting to address this as soon as they can identify a really good QB for this franchise AND their offense - in years past we may have 'reached' with this position
THESE GUYS ARE GOOD
Re: Hall praises the team, rips Haynesworth
Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2011 3:19 pm
by Irn-Bru
skinsfan#33 wrote:In bru,
This site list all credibility for me when I looked ast how it had Moss and
ey ranked. It had
ey as something like the 40th best TE in the league and Moss around the 60th.
Just absurd!!!
It's not a site with subjective rankings. If Moss comes in as the 60th best receiver, that doesn't necessarily mean they are saying he should be drafted 60th if you were starting a new team/league.
So the stats can't be used in quite the same way a lot of people like to use them. They are measurements for very specific things (and you can find all the info for what goes into them on the site).
Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2011 3:55 pm
by The Hogster
jeremyroyce wrote:Why does Hall need to recreate this mess regarding Big Albert? There is no doubt that Big Albert was a boob, but I don't understand why that was necessary?
Because he was asked by a reporter doing a story about this year's team not having big names like last year's team. It's not like he's gone out of his way to trash Fat Albert. He actually doesn't even mention him by name. It's just that everyone knows who he's talking about when he talks about so-called stars who won't come to work.
Did D Hall steal somebody's puppy?? Why so much hate for a guy who plays so well for us most of the time.
Re: Hall praises the team, rips Haynesworth
Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2011 4:06 pm
by skinsfan#33
Irn-Bru wrote:skinsfan#33 wrote:In bru,
This site list all credibility for me when I looked ast how it had Moss and
ey ranked. It had
ey as something like the 40th best TE in the league and Moss around the 60th.
Just absurd!!!
It's not a site with subjective rankings. If Moss comes in as the 60th best receiver, that doesn't necessarily mean they are saying he should be drafted 60th if you were starting a new team/league.
So the stats can't be used in quite the same way a lot of people like to use them. They are measurements for very specific things (and you can find all the info for what goes into them on the site).
I know they seem to cherry pick some stats to tel the story they want to tell. I'm not saying they are intentionally trying to make the Skins players look bad, they just have some stats that they value higher than others.
No way,
ey or Moss end up that low unless you are using some weird stats.
There is no way DHall is the 83rd best CB in the NFL.
Yes, those stats were cherry picked!
Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2011 4:08 pm
by langleyparkjoe
The Hogster wrote:jeremyroyce wrote:Why does Hall need to recreate this mess regarding Big Albert? There is no doubt that Big Albert was a boob, but I don't understand why that was necessary?
Because he was asked by a reporter doing a story about this year's team not having big names like last year's team. It's not like he's gone out of his way to trash Fat Albert. He actually doesn't even mention him by name. It's just that everyone knows who he's talking about when he talks about so-called stars who won't come to work.
Did D Hall steal somebody's puppy?? Why so much hate for a guy who plays so well for us most of the time.
*dapz* Hogster
That's what I'm saying man. I understand he isn't Champ, Revis, or Nandi but good grief already.
Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2011 4:10 pm
by RedskinsRule56
who is nandi? His name is Nnamdi..
Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2011 4:11 pm
by langleyparkjoe
RedskinsRule56 wrote:who is nandi? His name is Nnamdi..
Here's the funny part, you knew EXACTLY what I was talking bout.
Plus he isn't a Redskin so I can care less how you spell his name. Nandi, namdi, namdeez
Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2011 4:11 pm
by emoses14
RedskinsRule56 wrote:who is nandi? His name is Nnamdi..
Really?
Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2011 4:43 pm
by The Hogster
RedskinsRule56 wrote:who is nandi? His name is Nnamdi..
Dude. You are so negative, it's downright funny. Whose account did you hijack??
Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2011 5:13 pm
by SKINFAN
D Hall is a good fit here. He has great catch up speed, he baits the QB, sometimes it works sometimes it doesn't. I think peeps here are dead on, if he gets a good safety behind him, he'll have a better season than last year.
Posted: Tue Aug 30, 2011 7:35 pm
by cowboykillerzRGiii
Ha ha lpJ I told him the same mess yesterday if he aint a skin why would I care if I get it right?? So petty man reminds me of this fanatic I met once... Such rediculous posts. We get u hate this roster and hope we fail and magically acquire luck and a whole new roster.
now move on doode your posts are redundant and jus an eye sore anymore.
Hate hall?
post it up at dallascowpukes forum..
I dig hall and stats don't tell all.. Any other b&g db have as many ints? Tds? Dare I say WIN games? W a healthy secondary better LB help d hall will flourish into the best thing since DG 28. -lmao in my optimistic eyes at least.
Glad at least this D is confident and headed in the right direction.
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 5:44 pm
by jeremyroyce
The Hogster wrote:jeremyroyce wrote:Why does Hall need to recreate this mess regarding Big Albert? There is no doubt that Big Albert was a boob, but I don't understand why that was necessary?
Because he was asked by a reporter doing a story about this year's team not having big names like last year's team. It's not like he's gone out of his way to trash Fat Albert. He actually doesn't even mention him by name. It's just that everyone knows who he's talking about when he talks about so-called stars who won't come to work.
Did D Hall steal somebody's puppy?? Why so much hate for a guy who plays so well for us most of the time.
I never said that I hated Hall, and I don't believe that my response indicated that either. This is the comment that I had a problem with.
Do we have a guy that we’re paying $100 million to? No we don’t. But who needs a guy that you’re going to pay $100 million to if he won’t come out onto the field and play?
That in my opinion was not necessary and in my opinion that is throwing someone under the bus, and that again in my opinion is recreating this whole Big Albert saga which this team does not need to go through again.
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 6:01 pm
by KazooSkinsFan
jeremyroyce wrote:That in my opinion was not necessary and in my opinion that is throwing someone under the bus, and that again in my opinion is recreating this whole Big Albert saga which this team does not need to go through again.
Dude, Fat Albert wasn't "thrown" under the bus, he jumped under the bus
Posted: Wed Aug 31, 2011 6:48 pm
by SKINFAN
KazooSkinsFan wrote:jeremyroyce wrote:That in my opinion was not necessary and in my opinion that is throwing someone under the bus, and that again in my opinion is recreating this whole Big Albert saga which this team does not need to go through again.
Dude, Fat Albert wasn't "thrown" under the bus, he jumped under the bus
He went in for a play, but couldn't get up, that's why the bus ran him over.
Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:02 am
by jwmann2
Not sure that you can have quality free agents when you are 26 million below the cap. They did have some big departures but Mcnabb and Haynesworth brough drama, whether or not it was intentional is beyond me. Frankly, I though Shanahan was a little out of his element with those two.
Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2011 1:22 am
by HarleyHog
Deadskins wrote:RedskinsRule56 wrote:You just made a big mistake Harley Hog. You want proof Hall blows here you go. Read it and weep.
Posting links that Irn-Bru already posted does not invalidate Harley's criticism of your previous post.
Hardly a big mistake a hole. You may notice the term riposte, a term from swordplay, referring to a counter thrust. My critique of the post was almost a verbatim copy of your response to my post on another thread, you hypocritical son of a cowpuke. Whip out your stats all day, in the end he was MVP of the probowl. How many "better" corners single handedly won two games for their teams last year? This is the last time I am responding to any of your tripe, you slimy TROLL. Just wanted to clarify. The only way it was a big mistake was that it fed the TROLL. May you suffer disappointments at every turn, scumbag!
Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2011 9:21 am
by redskinz4ever
hall is a double edged sword he makes plays and will give up some ...... about the blitzes we will be throwing at qbs it will count on if we get to the qb make him make poor decisions the more time you give any qb he will fine an open wr
Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2011 9:29 am
by The Hogster
KazooSkinsFan wrote:jeremyroyce wrote:That in my opinion was not necessary and in my opinion that is throwing someone under the bus, and that again in my opinion is recreating this whole Big Albert saga which this team does not need to go through again.
Dude, Fat Albert wasn't "thrown" under the bus, he jumped under the bus
+1
Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2011 9:31 am
by SkinsJock
I don't think that Hall was 'attacking' the fat slob as much as he was making the point that the players that are here are making an effort and how hard it must have been to have players that were just showing up and, for the most part, rather than contribute to anything they were bent on creating a bad atmosphere on the the field and in the clubhouse
Good DBs are made better by getting pressure up front - our defense may not be really good this season but they will be better than we have seen for a few years - we have gotten better with our front 7 and with our secondary
I like having a guy like Hall playing for our secondary - he's a good CB
Posted: Thu Sep 01, 2011 8:06 pm
by yupchagee
KazooSkinsFan wrote:jeremyroyce wrote:That in my opinion was not necessary and in my opinion that is throwing someone under the bus, and that again in my opinion is recreating this whole Big Albert saga which this team does not need to go through again.
Dude, Fat Albert wasn't "thrown" under the bus, he jumped under the bus
More like stumbled. I don't think he CAN jump
Re: Hall praises the team, rips Haynesworth
Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2011 4:24 pm
by mastdark81
KazooSkinsFan wrote:Irn-Bru wrote:I hate to exercise caution about a guy who single-handedly won us two games a year ago, I'm concerned that he's going to regress to the mean on turnovers this year while his coverage continues to be spotty.
No doubt with Hall we live by the sword and die by the sword. But as I and others bashed Rogers for drawing more passes and allowing QB's to try to thread a needle because he was zero threat to intercept them, Hall diverts a lot of passes because he's an enormous threat to intercept. He also causes more overthrows and out of bounds throws as well as QB's want to make sure he can't get his hands on the ball. And he's on a good receiver as well. You can't just count passes given up and INTs.