Page 2 of 3

New WR in our future??? R. Moss released.

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 5:53 pm
by markshark84
I have no idea whether the skins would pick him up, but I wouldn't be surprised if there was some sort of interest.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/blog/shutdo ... nfl-281576

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 5:54 pm
by patjam77
Well if he does get waived or released, the Skins better try for him. He can't hurt. 'Tana Moss gets doubled and with Armstrong emerging as a deep threat, oppossing defenses would struggle to key on any one guy. Now if the O-line could give the QB time..........

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 9:48 pm
by Skinsfan55
The Skins could get him, they are like 16th or something in the waiver process. Some teams like the Bills won't even try because they have NO chance and Moss literally does nothing for their team and he wouldn't be interested in going there. Same for the Rams and others. I'd say the Redskins have a great shot... if they want him.

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 9:57 pm
by chiefhog44
patjam77 wrote:Well if he does get waived or released, the Skins better try for him. He can't hurt. 'Tana Moss gets doubled and with Armstrong emerging as a deep threat, oppossing defenses would struggle to key on any one guy. Now if the O-line could give the QB time..........


They would continue to key on blowing up Rabach...what do you mean? :lol:

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 11:32 pm
by HEROHAMO
Exactly why I wanted T.O. to come first. Now Moss is available we must pick him up. This team needs an offensive stud, no disrespect to Cooley or Santana. We just need a guy who can open up the field for everyone else.

Posted: Mon Nov 01, 2010 11:49 pm
by chiefhog44
Well one thing would be true is that they wouldn't be able to bring the safety in the box as much which would help the O-line, but that could be a major disruption. We still need a middle front three, and a RT.

Re: New WR in our future??? R. Moss released.

Posted: Tue Nov 02, 2010 9:02 am
by Kilmer72
markshark84 wrote:I have no idea whether the skins would pick him up, but I wouldn't be surprised if there was some sort of interest.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/blog/shutdo ... nfl-281576


Washington Press will eat this guy up. I don't care if he comes here or not. I still do not see the QB having much time if defenses keep bringing the sink.

Posted: Tue Nov 02, 2010 9:03 am
by RedskinsFreak
I'll always be against signing these types of attention seekers. All the way back to Deion.

His antics and lack of team-first mentality are non-starters to even considering him.

Bad scruples > whatever skills he might still have.

Posted: Tue Nov 02, 2010 9:59 am
by SKINFAN
we don't have the personnel to handle a player like this guy. =)

Posted: Tue Nov 02, 2010 11:41 am
by cowboykillerzRGiii
I'm down for x2 Moss attack... I think he may want to come here since Dmac has the most throws over twenty or forty yards so far this season and RM likes the deep ball. Plus DC is closer to his home then say west coast lol whens the deadline?

Posted: Tue Nov 02, 2010 1:28 pm
by The Hogster
McNabb leads the league in 40+ Yard TD receptions. Moss is best in league at 40+ Yard TD Passes. No Brainer.

Besides, the attention he draws will benefit Santana and Cooley greatly.

Posted: Tue Nov 02, 2010 1:55 pm
by SkinsJock
If we get a chance at Moss, they will pick him up

he's gone before we get that chance

Posted: Tue Nov 02, 2010 2:16 pm
by SAP_Pete
Read on a Raiders forum (translated into actual english):
The Redskins should get Moss AND Russell, they should develop a great chemistry. Moss is too good to eat the catered food, so he can just hand his plate to Russell.

Posted: Tue Nov 02, 2010 4:23 pm
by grampi
We need a whole NEW team, not a different team full of old has-beens...

Posted: Tue Nov 02, 2010 4:27 pm
by broomboy
SAP_Pete wrote:Read on a Raiders forum (translated into actual english):
The Redskins should get Moss AND Russell, they should develop a great chemistry. Moss is too good to eat the catered food, so he can just hand his plate to Russell.


That's actually funny! hahahahaha

Posted: Tue Nov 02, 2010 7:59 pm
by tribeofjudah
Moss is an IDIOT.... just cuz you have money NOW????? Where is your humbleness .....to your Maker....??? People who willfully tear down other people's character and livelyhood....tsk tsk tsk....have a Higher Judgement against them.

Moss is a turd and I wouldn't want him with the Skins.


Randy Moss, who was waived by the Minnesota Vikings on Tuesday, may have alienated some teammates when he was roundly critical of a post-practice meal in front of the local restaurant owners who catered it, Yahoo! Sports reported.

Every Friday, the Vikings invite a local establishment to cater the team's post-practice meal. Last Friday, it was a St. Paul restaurant -- a favorite of former Vikings center Matt Birk -- that served chicken, pasta, ribs and other dishes.


While his teammates lined up to dig in, Moss lashed out, according to the report.

Moss yelled "What the [expletive]? Who ordered this crap? I wouldn't feed this to my dog," a player who witnessed the incident said, according to Yahoo! Sports.
Gus Tinucci, co-owner of Tinucci's Restaurant and Catering, which provided the spread in question, confirmed the report to the St. Paul Pioneer Press.

"If [Brett] Favre would have had a ball, he would have beaned him right in the head. Favre looked at him like, 'Are you kidding me?' " Tinucci told the newspaper.


Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 2:03 am
by cowboykillerzRGiii
Food was probably crap.. Luke warm dry over cooked bs.. Just cus he is Randy Moss rich doesn't mean he can't call em as he sees em. Food probably woulda made rachel ray stab farve for eating it..

If not who cares let him order his own food and make some catches.. Randy over VJ nuff said

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 8:23 am
by redskindave
I would like to see the Redskins pick up Randy Moss, He id older but can still play

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 8:58 am
by VetSkinsFan
Who cares about his off-field behavior. He can still ball.

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 9:04 am
by Redskin in Canada
VetSkinsFan wrote:Who cares about his off-field behavior. He can still ball.

He carries a lot of baggage into the locker room. He is not a team player. There is no denying about his talent, just like T.O.

But ... unless you have a very solid TEAM without controversies, like New England, where they put up with nobody's nonsense, you really have to consider the distractions and the drama that he brings along.

I am not sure he is a good addition from the current situations within the Skins organization and his own departure from Minny but I am sure he would make some awesome plays. I am not sure he is a good addition or not. I like the player on the field. I hate the distractions that the selfish drama queen brings off the field into the locker room.

Before this past weekend, I would have argued YES because I thought that a strong MS coach who carried the locker room with him, would be able to manage Randy. Now, our coach has to make sure that he does not lose the locker room without Randy.

I am hopeful and confident that this Donovan incident will fade away. But there is damage work to be made among players and coaches, and coaches and fans before we add another issue to resolve because Randy is a high maintenance guy.

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 9:35 am
by VetSkinsFan
I'd risk it for Randy.

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 9:58 am
by KazooSkinsFan
Redskin in Canada wrote:He carries a lot of baggage into the locker room. He is not a team player. There is no denying about his talent, just like T.O

I definitely agree with your view they're both baggage players, but while I've always argued strongly against guys like TO who attack their teammates and cry babies like Cutler, I'd like to give Moss a shot. I'd have some frank discussions about behavior before signing him, but I don't see him as overtly harmful to the team. Though I'd have felt more strongly before his attack on the caterer as that is the harmful to others behavior I shun. I'd certainly structure the contract so we can dump him free and clear whenever we want.

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 10:03 am
by Redskin in Canada
Not gonna happen according to NFL.com ...

Meanwhile, leauge sources told La Canfora that the Tennessee Titans, St. Louis Rams, Seattle Seahawks and Miami Dolphins are among teams considering a waiver claim on Moss.

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 10:04 am
by VetSkinsFan
KazooSkinsFan wrote:
Redskin in Canada wrote:He carries a lot of baggage into the locker room. He is not a team player. There is no denying about his talent, just like T.O

I definitely agree with your view they're both baggage players, but while I've always argued strongly against guys like TO who attack their teammates and cry babies like Cutler, I'd like to give Moss a shot. I'd have some frank discussions about behavior before signing him, but I don't see him as overtly harmful to the team. Though I'd have felt more strongly before his attack on the caterer as that is the harmful to others behavior I shun. I'd certainly structure the contract so we can dump him free and clear whenever we want.


If we pick him up off waivers, then we can't restructure his contract, we take him as is, don't we?

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 10:16 am
by KazooSkinsFan
VetSkinsFan wrote:
KazooSkinsFan wrote:
Redskin in Canada wrote:He carries a lot of baggage into the locker room. He is not a team player. There is no denying about his talent, just like T.O

I definitely agree with your view they're both baggage players, but while I've always argued strongly against guys like TO who attack their teammates and cry babies like Cutler, I'd like to give Moss a shot. I'd have some frank discussions about behavior before signing him, but I don't see him as overtly harmful to the team. Though I'd have felt more strongly before his attack on the caterer as that is the harmful to others behavior I shun. I'd certainly structure the contract so we can dump him free and clear whenever we want.


If we pick him up off waivers, then we can't restructure his contract, we take him as is, don't we?

Good point on that. I was thinking he'd clear waivers. If he won't then I'm with you we should let whoever's willing to take his contract have him.