The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era

Posted: **Sun Sep 06, 2009 11:11 pm**

Californiaskin wrote:woodsons better than chase or colt.......already better off without those jokers.........id take him even over booty

I like booty, too :wink:

Posted: **Mon Sep 07, 2009 7:49 am**

1niksder wrote:
Gibbs4Life wrote:Colt's not going anywhere, Danny likes him, Zorn likes him, and I like him. He's shown TREMENDOUS upside and even this pre-season had as many great throws as poor ones; he's in his 2nd yr of a 2-3 yr development project, he gets another yr after 09

That just about seals his fate ....

Posted: **Mon Sep 07, 2009 8:12 am**

The other side around the stories relating to Chase and Colt is that ...

... we are stuck with Jason and Todd for the rest of the season injuries or no injuries, performance or no performance, OL or no OL. Woodson is unlikely to be ready to start this season.

Talk about a big decision ... if we are going to jump off the plane on a brand new season a week from now, I hope these parachutes work well.

:shock:

Posted: **Mon Sep 07, 2009 8:15 am**

Redskin in Canada wrote:The other side around the stories relating to Chase and Colt is that ...

... we are stuck with Jason and Todd for the rest of the season injuries or no injuries, performance or no performance, OL or no OL. Woodson is unlikely to be ready to start this season.

Talk about a big decision ... if we are going to jump off the plane on a brand new season a week from now, I hope these parachutes work well.

Have faith my Friends.....Zorny knows what he's doing.

Posted: **Mon Sep 07, 2009 9:28 am**

Redskin in Canada wrote:The other side around the stories relating to Chase and Colt is that ...

... we are stuck with Jason and Todd for the rest of the season injuries or no injuries, performance or no performance, OL or no OL. Woodson is unlikely to be ready to start this season.

We could always claim Chase off the NO practice squad, if we needed him to start a game, anyway. :roll:

Posted: **Mon Sep 07, 2009 9:57 am**

Deadskins wrote:
Redskin in Canada wrote:The other side around the stories relating to Chase and Colt is that ...

... we are stuck with Jason and Todd for the rest of the season injuries or no injuries, performance or no performance, OL or no OL. Woodson is unlikely to be ready to start this season.

We could always claim Chase off the NO practice squad, if we needed him to start a game, anyway.

Woow !!! a touch of genuis! Why did I not think of that?

Which begs the question of course: if he EVER was expected to start, why did they sign a different 3rd QB? :hmm:

But hey! Why would I know? Maybe we are using the PS of other teams as secret weapons to hide our real roster. :lol:

Posted: **Mon Sep 07, 2009 11:09 am**

Redskin in Canada wrote:
Deadskins wrote:
Redskin in Canada wrote:The other side around the stories relating to Chase and Colt is that ...

... we are stuck with Jason and Todd for the rest of the season injuries or no injuries, performance or no performance, OL or no OL. Woodson is unlikely to be ready to start this season.

We could always claim Chase off the NO practice squad, if we needed him to start a game, anyway.

Woow !!! a touch of genuis! Why did I not think of that?

Which begs the question of course: if he EVER was expected to start, why did they sign a different 3rd QB?

But hey! Why would I know? Maybe we are using the PS of other teams as secret weapons to hide our real roster.

It's the Practice Squad... It's the 3rd QB... it's a guy that gets to dress like a NFL QB on Sunday and that's it. Sometimes he actually will have real responsibilities but almost never on Sunday.

It's PRACTICE Squad folks, PRACTICE Squad, we talking about PRACTICE Squad.

Posted: **Mon Sep 07, 2009 11:12 am**

1niksder wrote:It's the Practice Squad... It's the 3rd QB... it's a guy that gets to dress like a NFL QB on Sunday and that's it. Sometimes he actually will have real responsibilities but almost never on Sunday.

It's PRACTICE Squad folks, PRACTICE Squad, we talking about PRACTICE Squad.

Exactly. Thank you.

Posted: **Mon Sep 07, 2009 12:51 pm**

SkinsFreak wrote:
1niksder wrote:It's the Practice Squad... It's the 3rd QB... it's a guy that gets to dress like a NFL QB on Sunday and that's it. Sometimes he actually will have real responsibilities but almost never on Sunday.

It's PRACTICE Squad folks, PRACTICE Squad, we talking about PRACTICE Squad.

Exactly. Thank you.

Well, except for the dressing on Sundays part. :twisted:

Posted: **Mon Sep 07, 2009 6:09 pm**

Gibbs4Life wrote:Colt's not going anywhere, Danny likes him, Zorn likes him, and I like him. He's shown TREMENDOUS upside and even this pre-season had as many great throws as poor ones; he's in his 2nd yr of a 2-3 yr development project, he gets another yr after 09

His being put on IR this year certainly gives him a chance, but you're not being realistic. It was a major slap at his chances with us long term, there is no other way to interpret it. IR means gone for the year. If they had more confidence in him they'd want him available this year. Not only were they willing to just write him off for the year but this means we'll be trying to find other QBs now. This is a clear "you have one year to show you belong here or you're gone."

Posted: **Mon Sep 07, 2009 7:47 pm**

KazooSkinsFan wrote: This is a clear "you have one year to show you belong here or you're gone."

I think they've seen all they needed to see

Posted: **Mon Sep 07, 2009 7:55 pm**

1niksder wrote:
KazooSkinsFan wrote: This is a clear "you have one year to show you belong here or you're gone."

I think they've seen all they needed to see

Why IR 'em then...why not just injury settle and call it a day?

Posted: **Mon Sep 07, 2009 8:14 pm**

VetSkinsFan wrote:
1niksder wrote:
KazooSkinsFan wrote: This is a clear "you have one year to show you belong here or you're gone."

I think they've seen all they needed to see

Why IR 'em then...why not just injury settle and call it a day?

It was time to trim the roster and the settlement has to be agreed to by both parties. Brennan shouldn't have a problem with agreeing but the the Skins have to consider cap implecations

Posted: **Mon Sep 07, 2009 11:45 pm**

1niksder wrote:It was time to trim the roster and the settlement has to be agreed to by both parties. Brennan shouldn't have a problem with agreeing but the the Skins have to consider cap implecations

Just to be clear, so you're agreeing with my saying:

kaz wrote:you're not being realistic. It was a major slap at his chances with us long term

I agree with you that it's possible they only want an injury settlement and haven't nailed it down. But having even a marginal QB in the offseason training and camp next year even if you're thinking it's over isn't a bad thing to have. And it does give him a chance to prove he belongs. All I'm saying is either is possible. But my main point you seem to be agreeing with is his long term with us is seriously in doubt or they wouldn't have made this move.

Posted: **Tue Sep 08, 2009 9:27 am**

Seems to me that we have Campbell and Collins and neither Brennan or Daniels showed the potential to be a really good QB - the search continues .... :wink:

Posted: **Tue Sep 08, 2009 9:52 pm**

Californiaskin wrote:id take him even over booty

ARE YOU INSANE???!!! Booty ALWAYS trumps everything else...especially a PS QB. :lol:

Posted: **Tue Sep 08, 2009 9:55 pm**

REDEEMEDSKIN wrote:
Californiaskin wrote:id take him even over booty

ARE YOU INSANE???!!! Booty ALWAYS trumps everything else...especially a PS QB.

Who are you, and what did you do with REDEEMEDSKIN???

Posted: **Tue Sep 08, 2009 10:57 pm**

Countertrey wrote:
REDEEMEDSKIN wrote:
Californiaskin wrote:id take him even over booty

ARE YOU INSANE???!!! Booty ALWAYS trumps everything else...especially a PS QB.

Who are you, and what did you do with REDEEMEDSKIN???

I was thinking the same thing

The-Hogs.net - Washington Football Discussion, Redskins to Commanders Era

Chase Daniel to the Saints Practice Squad