Deadskins wrote:Since the current team's season outcome isn't based on the O, then every move after JC, necessarily, can't be pure desperation. And my solution is going to Collins, or even whichever young gun we keep as #3, to give him real game experience for the future.
Sure it
can. Unless you're arguing he's going to be way WORSE then last year. My argument is he's not improving enough. I haven't seen anyone actually argue he's going to be worse then last year, you haven't. Otherwise, JC's not going to turn it over much and is going to score some points and get some drives going. Not a given for the alternatives. I'd like a better QB, but with our D's potential we could win that way. Our D may not be the Bears when they went to the superbowl, but I will say JC is better then Grossman.
Speaking of the alternatives, you finally answered my question on that you wouldn't pick any choice by selecting every choice.
What's your argument for TC being an upgrade to even an unimproved JC? That he played well in a few games in a system he was a BACKUP in his entire career? I'm going to give you I don't see TC turning it over a lot, but he is in the totally wrong offense to be a long term starter in and he wasn't even a starter in the one that fit him. You need more argument then he's not JC.
As for the 6th rounder or undrafted rookie, they could be unmitigated disasters. Other then the message board lovin they're getting, what's your argument they wouldn't give up more points then the D? That Brady did it? I can't even list the endless people drafted 6+ who were busts because no one knows who that endless list of people were because they were BUSTS. Again, not JC isn't an argument.