CanesSkins26 wrote:Colt is not the answer at qb.
Ok, then... Neither is Jason. So what do we do now?
CanesSkins26 wrote:HEROHAMO wrote:Hate to burst the bubble.
But, I said this when Colt was drafted. Many doubted it. But, he will eventually be our starter.
Zorn handpicked Colt. Colt is his guy. Campbell is Gibbs guy. Zorn is just giving Campbell a fair shot. I would not be surprised if Colt gets thrown in mid season.
Just think about it. If you were a head coach? Who would you pick of two unproven Qbs? A guy another coach drafted? Or choose a Qb you seem fit? Of course you are going to trust your own instincts.
Zorn is just doing the Politically correct move for now. Being that he is a rookie and trying not to make any controversial moves. A mistake on his part I think. I would rather he just trade Campbell away and start the process already.
A total contradiction of what I said about Josh Mcdaniels. The difference is Cutler was a bonified franchise QB. Who had shown improvement every year. Campbell is taking too long for me. Hurry up already. If your going to be great then we would have seen it by now. So far I have seen nothing.
Bring on Colt. Pass on Sanchez.
Colt is not the answer at qb.
VetSkinsFan wrote:CanesSkins26 wrote:HEROHAMO wrote:Hate to burst the bubble.
But, I said this when Colt was drafted. Many doubted it. But, he will eventually be our starter.
Zorn handpicked Colt. Colt is his guy. Campbell is Gibbs guy. Zorn is just giving Campbell a fair shot. I would not be surprised if Colt gets thrown in mid season.
Just think about it. If you were a head coach? Who would you pick of two unproven Qbs? A guy another coach drafted? Or choose a Qb you seem fit? Of course you are going to trust your own instincts.
Zorn is just doing the Politically correct move for now. Being that he is a rookie and trying not to make any controversial moves. A mistake on his part I think. I would rather he just trade Campbell away and start the process already.
A total contradiction of what I said about Josh Mcdaniels. The difference is Cutler was a bonified franchise QB. Who had shown improvement every year. Campbell is taking too long for me. Hurry up already. If your going to be great then we would have seen it by now. So far I have seen nothing.
Bring on Colt. Pass on Sanchez.
Colt is not the answer at qb.
Bottom line is this:
Colt has had no chance to prove he's a steal or a bust. There is no way at this point in Colt's short career that you can say he's not the answer without him having a chance. Well, I guess you can say anything you want, but there's no proof that the statement has a shred of truth...
Jason, on the other hand, has had a chance as an NFL startign QB and mediocrity is the best he's put out thus far.
eh you never know man, i mean look at Matt Cassel. He was a back up ever since his freshman year in college.CanesSkins26 wrote:VetSkinsFan wrote:CanesSkins26 wrote:HEROHAMO wrote:Hate to burst the bubble.
But, I said this when Colt was drafted. Many doubted it. But, he will eventually be our starter.
Zorn handpicked Colt. Colt is his guy. Campbell is Gibbs guy. Zorn is just giving Campbell a fair shot. I would not be surprised if Colt gets thrown in mid season.
Just think about it. If you were a head coach? Who would you pick of two unproven Qbs? A guy another coach drafted? Or choose a Qb you seem fit? Of course you are going to trust your own instincts.
Zorn is just doing the Politically correct move for now. Being that he is a rookie and trying not to make any controversial moves. A mistake on his part I think. I would rather he just trade Campbell away and start the process already.
A total contradiction of what I said about Josh Mcdaniels. The difference is Cutler was a bonified franchise QB. Who had shown improvement every year. Campbell is taking too long for me. Hurry up already. If your going to be great then we would have seen it by now. So far I have seen nothing.
Bring on Colt. Pass on Sanchez.
Colt is not the answer at qb.
Bottom line is this:
Colt has had no chance to prove he's a steal or a bust. There is no way at this point in Colt's short career that you can say he's not the answer without him having a chance. Well, I guess you can say anything you want, but there's no proof that the statement has a shred of truth...
Jason, on the other hand, has had a chance as an NFL startign QB and mediocrity is the best he's put out thus far.
Imo they both stink. That's why if I'm the Skins I consider taking Sanchez if he is there at 13. I agree that JC is a mediocre qb, but I don't think that a 6th rounder with a questionable arm and poor mechanics, that played in a run-and-shoot system and hardly ever took snaps from under center, is the answer to our qb problems either.
ChocolateMilk wrote:eh you never know man, i mean look at Matt Cassel. He was a back up ever since his freshman year in college.CanesSkins26 wrote:VetSkinsFan wrote:CanesSkins26 wrote:HEROHAMO wrote:Hate to burst the bubble.
But, I said this when Colt was drafted. Many doubted it. But, he will eventually be our starter.
Zorn handpicked Colt. Colt is his guy. Campbell is Gibbs guy. Zorn is just giving Campbell a fair shot. I would not be surprised if Colt gets thrown in mid season.
Just think about it. If you were a head coach? Who would you pick of two unproven Qbs? A guy another coach drafted? Or choose a Qb you seem fit? Of course you are going to trust your own instincts.
Zorn is just doing the Politically correct move for now. Being that he is a rookie and trying not to make any controversial moves. A mistake on his part I think. I would rather he just trade Campbell away and start the process already.
A total contradiction of what I said about Josh Mcdaniels. The difference is Cutler was a bonified franchise QB. Who had shown improvement every year. Campbell is taking too long for me. Hurry up already. If your going to be great then we would have seen it by now. So far I have seen nothing.
Bring on Colt. Pass on Sanchez.
Colt is not the answer at qb.
Bottom line is this:
Colt has had no chance to prove he's a steal or a bust. There is no way at this point in Colt's short career that you can say he's not the answer without him having a chance. Well, I guess you can say anything you want, but there's no proof that the statement has a shred of truth...
Jason, on the other hand, has had a chance as an NFL startign QB and mediocrity is the best he's put out thus far.
Imo they both stink. That's why if I'm the Skins I consider taking Sanchez if he is there at 13. I agree that JC is a mediocre qb, but I don't think that a 6th rounder with a questionable arm and poor mechanics, that played in a run-and-shoot system and hardly ever took snaps from under center, is the answer to our qb problems either.
CanesSkins26 wrote:VetSkinsFan wrote:CanesSkins26 wrote:HEROHAMO wrote:Hate to burst the bubble.
But, I said this when Colt was drafted. Many doubted it. But, he will eventually be our starter.
Zorn handpicked Colt. Colt is his guy. Campbell is Gibbs guy. Zorn is just giving Campbell a fair shot. I would not be surprised if Colt gets thrown in mid season.
Just think about it. If you were a head coach? Who would you pick of two unproven Qbs? A guy another coach drafted? Or choose a Qb you seem fit? Of course you are going to trust your own instincts.
Zorn is just doing the Politically correct move for now. Being that he is a rookie and trying not to make any controversial moves. A mistake on his part I think. I would rather he just trade Campbell away and start the process already.
A total contradiction of what I said about Josh Mcdaniels. The difference is Cutler was a bonified franchise QB. Who had shown improvement every year. Campbell is taking too long for me. Hurry up already. If your going to be great then we would have seen it by now. So far I have seen nothing.
Bring on Colt. Pass on Sanchez.
Colt is not the answer at qb.
Bottom line is this:
Colt has had no chance to prove he's a steal or a bust. There is no way at this point in Colt's short career that you can say he's not the answer without him having a chance. Well, I guess you can say anything you want, but there's no proof that the statement has a shred of truth...
Jason, on the other hand, has had a chance as an NFL startign QB and mediocrity is the best he's put out thus far.
Imo they both stink. That's why if I'm the Skins I consider taking Sanchez if he is there at 13. I agree that JC is a mediocre qb, but I don't think that a 6th rounder with a questionable arm and poor mechanics, that played in a run-and-shoot system and hardly ever took snaps from under center, is the answer to our qb problems either.
CanesSkins26 wrote: but I don't think that a 6th rounder with a questionable arm and poor mechanics, that played in a run-and-shoot system and hardly ever took snaps from under center, is the answer to our qb problems either.
CanesSkins26 wrote:Colt is not the answer at qb.
Chris Luva Luva wrote:We don't know how bad or good Colt is. Why not find out? I'm not saying make him a starter but give him some reps and run him in the preseason.
PulpExposure wrote:Chris Luva Luva wrote:We don't know how bad or good Colt is. Why not find out? I'm not saying make him a starter but give him some reps and run him in the preseason.
I agree, but you know that won't happen. I mean they're worried about damaging Jason's confidence.
Because almost trading for Cutler wouldn't have done that already...
Colt played pretty darn well for a rookie in preseason last year, after only four weeks of camp and NFL experience.
Rolling Eyes Dude... I mean... really... don't you think Zorn knew those things before he drafted Colt? I don't, for a minute, believe that Zorn, an ex-NFL QB and a highly touted QB coach, would draft the kid if he didn't think the he could coach him up to have a chance. They spent hours and hours studying film of Colt before the draft, so I'm quite sure Zorn was completely familiar with Colt's tendencies and abilities.
And since they did draft him, that tells me that Zorn, at the very least, thinks he can coach Colt into a solid back-up, which was the intention when they drafted him. Both Zorn and Cerrato said prior to the draft last year that they were going to target a QB to groom as Campbell's back-up. If Colt makes an impression and eventually gets the nod, that's a bonus and a credit to Zorn.
VetSkinsFan wrote:...and that still doesn't unequivocally prove that Brennan won't or can't make it in the NFL. I'm glad you do your research on statistics, but if statistics proved everything without a shadow of a doubt, then what fun would the best damn sport in the world be?
The fact of the matter is that Brennan hasn't failed (yet). Will he? Time will tell, but at this point in time, all time says is wait and see.
VetSkinsFan wrote:...and that still doesn't unequivocally prove that Brennan won't or can't make it in the NFL. I'm glad you do your research on statistics, but if statistics proved everything without a shadow of a doubt, then what fun would the best damn sport in the world be?
The fact of the matter is that Brennan hasn't failed (yet). Will he? Time will tell, but at this point in time, all time says is wait and see.
CanesSkins26 wrote:Whether or not he can actually do it is yet to be seen.
CanesSkins26 wrote:VetSkinsFan wrote:...and that still doesn't unequivocally prove that Brennan won't or can't make it in the NFL. I'm glad you do your research on statistics, but if statistics proved everything without a shadow of a doubt, then what fun would the best damn sport in the world be?
The fact of the matter is that Brennan hasn't failed (yet). Will he? Time will tell, but at this point in time, all time says is wait and see.
I agree. But to not draft a qb because we have Brennan is stupid. If he amounts to something, great, but we can't rely on the possibility of a 6th rounder turning into a starting qb.
If JC doesn't get the job done this season we are in a world of trouble in 2010 at the qb spot so imo it would be a good idea to start planning now.
CanesSkins26 wrote:Very few 6th round quarterbacks amount to anything in the NFL so the idea that Brennan is going to be able to start if JC struggles is rather far-fetched
CanesSkins26 wrote:VetSkinsFan wrote:...and that still doesn't unequivocally prove that Brennan won't or can't make it in the NFL. I'm glad you do your research on statistics, but if statistics proved everything without a shadow of a doubt, then what fun would the best damn sport in the world be?
The fact of the matter is that Brennan hasn't failed (yet). Will he? Time will tell, but at this point in time, all time says is wait and see.
I agree. But to not draft a qb because we have Brennan is stupid. If he amounts to something, great, but we can't rely on the possibility of a 6th rounder turning into a starting qb.
If JC doesn't get the job done this season we are in a world of trouble in 2010 at the qb spot so imo it would be a good idea to start planning now.
Originally Published: April 14, 2009
Tuesday with Mel Kiper Jr.
Mel works overtime to bring you the latest news from the NFL draft
It's quarterbacks all around this week for NFL draft guru Mel Kiper. But in a change of pace, he was asked about quarterbacks not named Matthew Stafford or Jay Cutler -- USC's Mark Sanchez, Kansas State's Josh Freeman and Ball State's Nate Davis.
WHERE IN THE WORLD WILL SANCHEZ GO?
Sanchez might be taken as high as No. 2 or as low as No. 13, with up to eight teams interested in this underclassman. But whoever gets him -- the Redskins, Jets and Buccaneers are front-runners, Kiper said -- most likely will have to trade up and deal with Jacksonville at No. 8 or San Francisco at No. 10.
Washington (No. 13): Right now, Kiper's mock draft has Sanchez going to the Redskins at No. 13, and recent reports say the Redskins love Sanchez. So it makes sense. But the thing is, Kiper doesn't think Sanchez actually will drop to No. 13. He just thinks Washington will end up with him. So look for a trade that allows the Redskins to move into the top 10 to take Sanchez. But what about Jason Campbell? Redskins owner Daniel Snyder apparently wants anyone but Campbell at quarterback.