Page 2 of 5

Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 3:37 pm
by DEHog
Skinsfan55 wrote:The Eagles do NOT win without Brian Westbrook.

Not only is he an explosive runner, but he's almost unmatched as a receiver out of the backfield.

Here's their receiving stats since 2004:

Portis- 71 games, 162 receptions (2.3 per game), 1,228 yards (17.3 per game), 2 TD (all in 2004).

Westbrook- 69 games, 355 receptions (5.1 per game), 3,191 yards (46.2 per game), 24 TD.

Brian Westbrook averages 638 yards a season with 5 TDs. He's a serious weapon for McNabb and he adds just as much with the run game. (Which has already been shown is more than the Redskins can muster.

So it's actually a pretty sterling example.


Again I will ask you to look at the stats...you were talking about the running game...read my post I said team are more fearful of Westbrook as a reciever thanks for making my point!
This isn't a dicussion about Portis' rushing stats vs. Westbrook's Westbrook has had one season over 1300 Porits only one season under , when he only played in 8 games. If you took the time to look up the stats you'd know that.

But back to your point...
Hell, if any good QB in this league Brees, McNabb, etc. etc. all of a sudden lost their running and offensive line production they'd be screwed.


While I agree with your statement I just don't agree with your examples. When I think of runnning games I don't think of Philly or N.O for that matter.
I have to endure alot of Philly news here and guess what all the talk about them this year was...The inability to rush the ball and Ried not calling enough running plays.

And yes the eagles do manage to win without Westbrook in the running game...check out his rushing stats inthe recent playoffs??

Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 3:42 pm
by RayNAustin
Comparing Campbell and McNabb is an abomination. There is no comparison except that they play the same position.

McNabb has demonstrated success over the long haul, year after year, and he showed his potential early on, throwing 21 TD in his first full season starting in 2000 (6 games starting experience from 1999). What's more, he was sacked that year 45 times. That sack number would suggest that he was under significant pressure given McNabb's talent to scramble and make plays with his legs. He has demonstrated many many times the ability to carry his team, and be a game changer.

Nosiree - to compare the two is like comparing Cindy Crawford and Rosanne Barr.

Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 4:06 pm
by SkinsJock
Skinsfan55 wrote:.. Jason Campbell may never be a Tom Brady or Peyton Manning, but he's a good NFL QB and if used right he could be a Pro Bowler.

Since the point of Campbell's future is kind of moot for next year (he's obviously coming back and starting) what's the argument about? We'll all get a chance to watch his progress.


no argument here :lol:

Campbell will NEVER be a Brady or a Manning. 8)

He is already a good QB and he most likely will be a very good QB - possibly even this season but in my opinion he will never be good enough and there is a huge difference. I would very much expect him to benefit from Zorn's attention in the near term but again you cannot make him into a QB that is good enough to be able to make a difference when it counts - that's what makes certain QBs special and he willl never get to that level.

I agree, we will see him as our starter at the begining of this year but I surely hope he's not there at the end - he's good but he's not good enough. :wink:

Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 10:21 pm
by riggofan
I think Campbell will be better. Maybe even significantly better if we get some improvement on the offensive line.

Anybody remember Matt Hasselbeck's first year as the Seahawks' starter? Its amazing he got a second year.

Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 10:24 pm
by PulpExposure
RayNAustin wrote:Comparing Campbell and McNabb is an abomination. There is no comparison except that they play the same position.

McNabb has demonstrated success over the long haul, year after year, and he showed his potential early on, throwing 21 TD in his first full season starting in 2000 (6 games starting experience from 1999). What's more, he was sacked that year 45 times. That sack number would suggest that he was under significant pressure given McNabb's talent to scramble and make plays with his legs.


Actually, it's because he held the ball too long trying to extend plays with his legs. He's always had a decent offensive line to play behind, because the Eagles actually draft offensive linemen. It's kind of a shocker to see a team prioritize the line...

He has demonstrated many many times the ability to carry his team, and be a game changer.


Yeah, McNabb is a bad comparison. No QB does more with less, really...and all he (and Reid) gets for it from the local Philly fans is a lot of crap. Those fans are so freaking ungrateful.

Really, it wasn't that long ago they were treated coach-QB combos like Richie Kotite-Bobby Hoying.

Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 11:05 pm
by SoulDOut
everytime i think of JC as a QB, i keep thinking he's like a basketball player...
a half-court/slow footed 3 point shooter who's on a fast-breaking/full-court press team that likes to dunk the ball ;)

oh, and i think 'slightly' better than last year. old habits are harder to kill each passing year

Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2009 11:09 pm
by tcwest10
Campbell will do better when three things happen.
1.) He gets to stay in the same system for three seasons.
2.) He gets his release quickened
3.) He finds receivers that can make something from nothing, like a Moss or a Fitzgerald. You know, a guy that can just win at jumpball and make it happen.
Not for the sake of comparing the people, but just the results. What happened to Eli, SuperBowl MVP last season, when Plaxico literally shot the season all to hell? All those second tier guys couldn't get it done.
Note: When they played us in the second game, it wasn't known then that Burress was done for the year...those guys were just "holding down the fort", as far as they knew. Once it became clear that he was gone, everything fell apart...running game be damned.
Summary? JC needs those two tall, lanky WR's we drafted to get it in gear.

Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2009 12:00 am
by Champsturf
tcwest10 wrote:Campbell will do better when three things happen.
1.) He gets to stay in the same system for three seasons.
2.) He gets his release quickened
3.) He finds receivers that can make something from nothing, like a Moss or a Fitzgerald. You know, a guy that can just win at jumpball and make it happen.
Not for the sake of comparing the people, but just the results. What happened to Eli, SuperBowl MVP last season, when Plaxico literally shot the season all to hell? All those second tier guys couldn't get it done.
Note: When they played us in the second game, it wasn't known then that Burress was done for the year...those guys were just "holding down the fort", as far as they knew. Once it became clear that he was gone, everything fell apart...running game be damned.
Summary? JC needs those two tall, lanky WR's we drafted to get it in gear.
I agree...wouldn't it be nice if they could see the field, especially when the season was already "over?"

Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2009 12:48 pm
by Deadskins
tcwest10 wrote:When they played us in the second game, it wasn't known then that Burress was done for the year.

They knew he was shot in the leg. I think they had a pretty good idea he wasn't coming back in less than a month.

Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2009 1:44 pm
by Chris Luva Luva
tcwest10 wrote:Campbell will do better when three things happen.
1.) He gets to stay in the same system for three seasons.

Agreed but won't happen because of your next point...

tcwest10 wrote:2.) He gets his release quickened

Won't happen. That's just how he throws. That slow release keys defenders on where he's going. Which prevents your next point...

tcwest10 wrote:3.) He finds receivers that can make something from nothing, like a Moss or a Fitzgerald. You know, a guy that can just win at jumpball and make it happen.


We have guys who can do that now but Jason doesn't hit them in stride.

Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2009 2:28 pm
by SkinsFreak
tcwest10 wrote:Campbell will do better when three things happen.
1.) He gets to stay in the same system for three seasons.
2.) He gets his release quickened
3.) He finds receivers that can make something from nothing, like a Moss or a Fitzgerald. You know, a guy that can just win at jumpball and make it happen.
Not for the sake of comparing the people, but just the results. What happened to Eli, SuperBowl MVP last season, when Plaxico literally shot the season all to hell? All those second tier guys couldn't get it done.
Note: When they played us in the second game, it wasn't known then that Burress was done for the year...those guys were just "holding down the fort", as far as they knew. Once it became clear that he was gone, everything fell apart...running game be damned.
Summary? JC needs those two tall, lanky WR's we drafted to get it in gear.


I, for one, agree with all points, tcwest10.

Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2009 2:29 pm
by Bob 0119
The biggest problem I see with Jason is that he doesn't seem able to throw the ball into "space."

It looks like he can hit the open guy, when/if he sees him, but doesn't throw the ball where the reciever is going to be.

Can anyone tell me of a time when they saw him complete a pass by throwing the ball before the reciever began to cut to the inside?

Other than that, I think he's a capable QB, just not a playmaker.

Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2009 3:16 pm
by SkinsFreak
Bob 0119 wrote:The biggest problem I see with Jason is that he doesn't seem able to throw the ball into "space."

It looks like he can hit the open guy, when/if he sees him, but doesn't throw the ball where the receiver is going to be.


I agree, and I've criticized JC for holding the ball too long, not throwing into tight or open spaces and not giving the receiver a chance to make a play.

But I think there's an easy explanation for that and one that can be fixed. First of all, a QB doesn't need a rocket release to be successful, and there are many examples of successful QB's that don't have that super quick release.

But because of the pressure Zorn has put on JC, JC has been playing nervous, trying not to make a mistake. That's why I think we see him hold the ball too long and not throw it in many circumstances, but also why we saw few INT's from JC this year. This is correctable, especially when JC becomes more confident from knowing what Zorn expects from him and knowing the system better. Zorn even said he was tough on JC...

Redskins.com wrote:That led to a question from a reporter whether Zorn would consider making a change at quarterback.

"No," he replied, before the question was even finished.

Campbell’s "average" play is part of growing pains in learning his offense, Zorn suggested.

“I am putting Jason in some advanced situations because really we have to move along with this football season,” Zorn said. “We all hope that there is a balance there. And I probably have tipped the scales. Those are things that you find out as you go along.

“I’m trying to push it. Now maybe I take a step back.”

“I felt like Jason had some real plus plays, but a coupe of decisions that he made and couple of throws that he made were off,” Zorn said. "You have to understand I put a lot on him to be right every time. He knows I think he can do it. And I do think he can really do it.

“You can say, ‘Coach Zorn is frustrated with Jason Campbell.’ But I’m frustrated if he makes even one error.”

Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2009 7:27 pm
by tcwest10
Chris Luva Luva wrote:
tcwest10 wrote:Campbell will do better when three things happen.
1.) He gets to stay in the same system for three seasons.

Agreed but won't happen because of your next point...

tcwest10 wrote:2.) He gets his release quickened

Won't happen. That's just how he throws. That slow release keys defenders on where he's going. Which prevents your next point...

tcwest10 wrote:3.) He finds receivers that can make something from nothing, like a Moss or a Fitzgerald. You know, a guy that can just win at jumpball and make it happen.


We have guys who can do that now but Jason doesn't hit them in stride.


CLL...I love 'tana. Really, I do. I like ARE, sometimes. Thrash is probably done, but I like him too. So, who did you mean when you wrote that we have guys like that now? We simply did not have that tall playmaker that I refer to. Not on the field, anyway.
I have to argue that a QB can't unlearn the release, because it's been done. It's not like asking him to switch hands. To say he can't is a tough call to make. At this time, we don't know what we have in JC exactly because of the constant turnover in his coaching.
Todd Collins is a classic example of a system QB. That would be hard to unlearn. Campbell is a jack of all trades, who has to learn and unlearn myriad aspects of various systems. He's having trouble putting it all together, as anyone would.
I will absolutely argue that he can't hit his receivers in stride. He can, but his receivers are rarely giving him the opportunity and the separation needed to have a stride to be hit in. Who did we see streaking down the sidelines without a look on anything other than a busted play? I saw every game but one this year. What did I miss?
Are Thomas and Kelly the answer? I hope so, because they were drafted to be.
I can't get get down on Jason until he utterly fails under Zorn's tutelage, which has only just gotten underway.
Give the kid (and he is still a kid, Chrissy) some time in the Zorn system before you totally give up on him. I want to like and trust Campbell, as I know you do. I know he hasn't made it easy, but he hasn't had it easy either.
At any rate, my friend...that's our QB. Might as well find something nice to say about him, 'cause he's ours. :)

Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2009 11:34 pm
by chiefhog44
yes he will do better

Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 12:09 am
by brad7686
Chris Luva Luva wrote:
tcwest10 wrote:Campbell will do better when three things happen.
1.) He gets to stay in the same system for three seasons.

Agreed but won't happen because of your next point...

tcwest10 wrote:2.) He gets his release quickened

Won't happen. That's just how he throws. That slow release keys defenders on where he's going. Which prevents your next point...

tcwest10 wrote:3.) He finds receivers that can make something from nothing, like a Moss or a Fitzgerald. You know, a guy that can just win at jumpball and make it happen.


We have guys who can do that now but Jason doesn't hit them in stride.


Um, no not at all.

Moss rarely gets open downfield anymore, and he dropped many catchable balls when he did. Why? Because he has bad hands, doesn't adjust to the ball, and is short. Randle El is never open downfield. Thomas didn't get open downfield. Kelly got hit in the chest with one and dropped it. That's a summary of our downfield passing this year. Maybe JC messed up 3 or 4, but more were just balls no one made a play on. I don't know if you have ever watched T.O., Plax, or Fitz play, or even Rowdy Roddy, Jennings, Andre Johnson, Houshmandzadeh, Colston, etc., but we do not have anyone half as good in a jump ball situation as they are, and they also have the physicality to keep corners off them downfield. It would be one thing if Moss still had young speed like DeSean Jackson, but he no longer does.

Look at Favre with Greg Jennings and then without like this year in New York. Rodgers played much better than Favre did. Why? Greg Jennings is a beast. The jets have a better version of Moss/El in Cotchery/Coles, but they still aren't big playmakers downfield. That's why Favre struggled. Other than Drew Brees after Colston got hurt, there is no one in the league putting up big passing numbers without an elite receiver in the NFL.

If JC's release was as slow as you say, all his downfield throws would have been picked by safeties. That didn't happen. He does however, get out of the snap slowly which prevents quick passing. That would be a key problem that needs to be fixed. Especially watching Warner pick apart the Eagles blitz the other day with quick passes.

In general, the passing game is inept at all positions, including playcalling, and until everyone pulls their weight, we won't have a passing game. No more dropping 4 3rd down passes, No more holding the ball, no more calling routes that end before the first down, no more running routes that end before the first down, etc. And someone needs to become a playmaker. Otherwise, no. Same as last year.

Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 5:03 pm
by tcwest10
I think Brad said, "Ditto".
I brought my popcorn, CLL. :)

Posted: Thu Jan 22, 2009 8:59 pm
by Californiaskin
soup is better if he can stay off his "can"..........ie: get some oline thats not like 40 and that does not get driven back into him like Pete "I'm old and sucked so bad the Jets cut me" Kendall

The Campbell Question

Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 12:49 am
by Gibbs4Life
This year Jason Campbell = 84.3 rating 3,245 yds 13 Tds

Eli Manning = 86.4 rating 3,238 yds 21 Tds

Ben Rothlisburger = 80.1 rating 3,301 yds 17 tds

Not that much difference


I'm in a weird space because part of me believes Campbell can get it done, but the other part is like Wow Brennan could be the next superstar and Campbell as of now is no superstar. I can't imagine their being more pressure on any other QB going into this upcoming season, of course if Campbell stays true to form he'll show little emotion about things. Imagine the post game interview if Jason won the SB he'd be like "Man, its great" and "Its just a blessing to be here" Does anyone truly forsee Jason Campbell ever hoisting the lombardi trophy? Should we committ long-term?

Re: The Campbell Question

Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 12:54 am
by Hoss
Gibbs4Life wrote:This year Jason Campbell = 84.3 rating 3,245 yds 13 Tds

Eli Manning = 86.4 rating 3,238 yds 21 Tds

Ben Rothlisburger = 80.1 rating 3,301 yds 17 tds

Not that much difference


I'm in a weird space because part of me believes Campbell can get it done, but the other part is like Wow Brennan could be the next superstar and Campbell as of now is no superstar. I can't imagine their being more pressure on any other QB going into this upcoming season, of course if Campbell stays true to form he'll show little emotion about things. Imagine the post game interview if Jason won the SB he'd be like "Man, its great" and "Its just a blessing to be here" Does anyone truly forsee Jason Campbell ever hoisting the lombardi trophy? Should we committ long-term?


merged

Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 12:58 am
by Gibbs4Life
Californiaskin wrote:soup is better if he can stay off his "can"..........ie: get some oline thats not like 40 and that does not get driven back into him like Pete "I'm old and sucked so bad the Jets cut me" Kendall


Didn't we trade for Kendall?

Re: The Campbell Question

Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 11:16 am
by RayNAustin
Gibbs4Life wrote:This year Jason Campbell = 84.3 rating 3,245 yds 13 Tds

Eli Manning = 86.4 rating 3,238 yds 21 Tds

Ben Rothlisburger = 80.1 rating 3,301 yds 17 tds

Not that much difference


Not much difference? Sir, the difference between 21 TD's and 13 TD's is a HUGE difference.

Can you not conceive how 8 more TD's this past year might have changed the outcome of some of the games? If equally distributed, that number of points would equate to 3.5 points per game, though unlikely to be split equally since there is no such thing as half a TD. So it's reasonable to conclude that 8 TD's would have counted at worst to an additional 7 points in each of 8 games. Now, consider that 4 of 8 losses were by 7 or fewer points, the significance should be obvious, and the implications far reaching.

The Campbell debate has become irrational in the extreme. And expecting anything more of him than what we've already experienced has no foundation in fact or reality.

Re: The Campbell Question

Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 12:19 pm
by SkinsFreak
RayNAustin wrote:The Campbell debate has become irrational in the extreme. And expecting anything more of him than what we've already experienced has no foundation in fact or reality.


:roll: Thanks for that opinion, Ray, but it's only that... an opinion, and one that is definitely not grounded in fact or reality.

Jason's reached his apex? He's done at 27? Can't get any better under Zorn?

JC has showed improvement every year in just about every category. To assert that he can't continue to improve under the guidance of a QG guru like Zorn is a stretch, to say the least. And with the facts clearly showing his progression, asserting that he can't continue to progress is what shows no foundation in fact or reality.

Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 1:12 pm
by RayNAustin
brad7686 wrote:Um, no not at all.

Moss rarely gets open downfield anymore, and he dropped many catchable balls when he did. Why? Because he has bad hands, doesn't adjust to the ball, and is short. Randle El is never open downfield. Thomas didn't get open downfield. Kelly got hit in the chest with one and dropped it. That's a summary of our downfield passing this year. Maybe JC messed up 3 or 4, but more were just balls no one made a play on. I don't know if you have ever watched T.O., Plax, or Fitz play, or even Rowdy Roddy, Jennings, Andre Johnson, Houshmandzadeh, Colston, etc., but we do not have anyone half as good in a jump ball situation as they are, and they also have the physicality to keep corners off them downfield. It would be one thing if Moss still had young speed like DeSean Jackson, but he no longer does.


T.O. ? T.O. ? Doesn't he lead the league or close to leading it in dropped passes? And Campbell missed 3 or 4 plays ALL YEAR ????

First, this critique of Santana Moss is absurd, and he's open down field in virtually every game with Campbell failing to even notice him (which also obliterates the nonsense that Campbell only fouled up 3 or 4 passes all year. The truth is more like 3-4 passes or more PER GAME). And unlike last year, when Moss's nagging injuries were being used as an excuse, he remained relatively healthy this year, and was constantly getting behind the secondaries DEEP. Had he had a QB on his team, he'd have finished in the top 5 receivers in the league. As it turned out, he still had more catches and more yards than many of the names you mentioned that are supposedly so superior to him.

brad7686 wrote:Look at Favre with Greg Jennings and then without like this year in New York. Rodgers played much better than Favre did. Why? Greg Jennings is a beast. The jets have a better version of Moss/El in Cotchery/Coles, but they still aren't big playmakers downfield. That's why Favre struggled. Other than Drew Brees after Colston got hurt, there is no one in the league putting up big passing numbers without an elite receiver in the NFL.


Greg Jennings had 1 more catch than Santana, and 250 more yards for the year. And I contend that the difference is that Rodgers performed head and shoulders above Campbell. I'd also contend that there is not an elite receiver out there that doesn't have a solid QB throwing to him. And yes, let's do look at Favre without the 'beasts' that Rodgers apparently has, he still threw 22 TD's compared to Campbell's paltry 13.

Another case in point: look at Randy Moss 2007 numbers with Brady and then look at his numbers in 2008 with Cassel. Did Randy lose a step or forget how to get open? That's what they were saying about him when he was with the Raiders, but as soon as he landed in New England with Brady, he put that nonsense to bed. No. Brady is just a superior QB, as is Brees, Warner, Rivers, Cutler, and the first year starter Rodgers who had never started an NFL game in his life before this year and still threw for over 4,000 yards and 28 TDs......which should also dispel the lame notion that it takes 4 years for a young QB to BEGIN TO PERFORM at a high level.

brad7686 wrote:If JC's release was as slow as you say, all his downfield throws would have been picked by safeties. That didn't happen. He does however, get out of the snap slowly which prevents quick passing. That would be a key problem that needs to be fixed. Especially watching Warner pick apart the Eagles blitz the other day with quick passes.


Ridiculous. Quite often his throws are well overthrown down field, and fall incomplete. Other times he doesn't even throw it or see the open receiver, and when he does, he waits too long, allowing the secondary to close and defend the play, so I doubt that he'd become a wizard with the fade passes even if he had a 6' 5" jump ball snatcher. His accuracy and touch on balls is highly suspect and very inconsistent. And given the number of dirt balls he throws, I don't think taller would help much.

brad7686 wrote: In general, the passing game is inept at all positions, including playcalling, and until everyone pulls their weight, we won't have a passing game. No more dropping 4 3rd down passes, No more holding the ball, no more calling routes that end before the first down, no more running routes that end before the first down, etc. And someone needs to become a playmaker. Otherwise, no. Same as last year.


That's what was said last year. Yet, Collins managed to overcome the bad play calling and the poor o-line and the midget receivers with bad hands. And this year we had a new set of coaches and a new approach to offense with Zorn, and Campbell still showed the same difficulties. Campbells relatively decent yardage and completion percentage stats (which is the primary cause of the decent QB rating) this year have more to do with the short, high percentage passing attack, and yards after catch than his QB skills which were more accurately defined by his lack of scoring and ability to make the big play.

Yesterday's Super Bowl illustrates the significance of the skills and ability that Campbell has failed to demonstrate. Big Ben was harassed and chased quite a bit all day, yet he scrambled, avoided sacks and made the big plays when he needed them (no blame the o-line game going on in Pittsburgh). And Warner defeated the pressure of the Steelers defense by finding the open receiver and getting rid of the ball quickly even though his number one and number two receivers were taken out of play for almost the entire first half. He still managed to find his third and fourth options .. picked up on the blitzes and pressure and made plays all day long while being knocked to the ground after releasing the ball. And without a running game (33 yards), Warner threw for 377 yards against the number 1 defense in the NFL. Think the Cardinals would have made it to the Super Bowl and come close to winning it with Leinart at the helm? No. They'd have finished below 500 and would have been watching the playoffs on TV just like the Redskins, even with those great receivers. Just take a look at the numbers for Boldin and Fitzgerald in 2006 with Leinart, and compare that to their numbers with Warner.

Keep in mind something here. Yesterday's game proves that one or two plays can dramatically alter the results of a game. Take away that 1 interception, and that 1 great pass/catch to Holmes for a TD, and the Cardinals win the Super Bowl 30 to 13. 2 plays!

Now tell me that having a QB that can make a couple of plays on his own each game wouldn't dramatically change the entire season and the poor offensive results we've become accustomed to seeing over the past three years?

Re: The Campbell Question

Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2009 2:04 pm
by RayNAustin
SkinsFreak wrote:
RayNAustin wrote:The Campbell debate has become irrational in the extreme. And expecting anything more of him than what we've already experienced has no foundation in fact or reality.


:roll: Thanks for that opinion, Ray, but it's only that... an opinion, and one that is definitely not grounded in fact or reality.

Jason's reached his apex? He's done at 27? Can't get any better under Zorn?

JC has showed improvement every year in just about every category. To assert that he can't continue to improve under the guidance of a QG guru like Zorn is a stretch, to say the least. And with the facts clearly showing his progression, asserting that he can't continue to progress is what shows no foundation in fact or reality.


Not true at all. In the category that really counts, his results have declined. So it is YOUR OPINION that is short on facts. The FACTS are his ability to put points on the board have digressed substantially each year he has played. First 7 games in 2006 = 10 TD's. (1.42 TD/g) Next 13 games in 2007 = 12 TD's (.92 TD /g) Next 16 games in 2008 = 13 TD's. (.81 TD /g) Furthermore, his yards per game and yards per play have declined slightly though remain fairly close from day one to present, so please do point out the big improvement you speak of.

Sure, his turnovers have improved and his completion percentage has as well (the two items that bumped up his QB rating). Is that the improvement you are citing? If so, I say that is due to an offensive system that revolves around short, high percentage passes that would obviously result in improvement in those areas. Yet the core issues with Campbell remain constant and consistent. He's slow. He doesn't have very good vision or ability to read defenses well. He locks in on one receiver. He holds the ball too long, and he misses a lot of down field opportunities either with poor accuracy or failing to see the open receivers at all.

Come on.....can you seriously watch the same season I just watched and make such outlandish remarks? Campbell looked like a High School jr in that 2-6 debackle of a finish, after a 6-2 start.

Take away the first half of the season, and this would be one of the worst QB performances in Redskin history. Very much closer to Heath Shuler than any other QB in recent memory.

And there is a reason why we aren't hearing any talk about getting him signed to an extension before the 2009 season. The Redskin FO and coaching staff are now beginning to have their doubts about Campbell as the long term solution too. Otherwise, they'd be hot to get him signed to an extension before he becomes a free agent at the end of the year.