Page 2 of 2
Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 5:28 pm
by PulpExposure
VetSkinsFan wrote:Cut Carter, too, since he started off slow!!
Well, he got half a sack. So he can stay
this week.
Posted: Fri Sep 12, 2008 5:46 pm
by Bob 0119
PulpExposure wrote:VetSkinsFan wrote:Cut Carter, too, since he started off slow!!
Well, he got half a sack. So he can stay
this week.
A measly half a sack?!
That's only 8 total sacks over a 16 game season. He had 10.5 last year...he's regressing.
Y'know what that means...
Taylor meanwhile had 0 sacks. That's zero sacks over the course of a 16-game season.
He'll have to go.
Posted: Sat Sep 13, 2008 9:55 pm
by skinsfan#33
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 1:06 am
by Gibbs4Life
I guess we can't blame jason for being soft since apparently he is known for that. Where the blame lies is on Vinny.
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 12:22 pm
by ChillWill
JT got blamed a lot on stopping the run but let's also consider that our outside linebackers are not playing at a high level. The truth of the matter is that JT should not have even played. Also we are getting zero pressure from our DT's. If there is someone to question what about the dropoff in play let's consider Cornelius Griffin.
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2008 12:14 am
by Deadskins
Yeah, ask Drew Brees how much JT sucks.
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2008 1:03 am
by Gibbs4Life
JT came to play against N.O.; I'm sticking to the theory that he reads message boards and this thread was his motivation

Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2008 3:01 am
by Wahoo McDaniels
I never thought JT sucked, I just questioned the intelligence of trading for a 34 year old who has gone on record saying that he might only play for one more year.
The problem is we completely mismanaged the draft by not taking care of one of our biggest needs in an early round. When tragedy struck (Daniels going down, we had only one option: to pay through the nose for a pass rusher. Had we used our draft pick on Calais Campbell, when he fell in our laps we might not have been in this predicament. Now Campbell is starting and playing well. Hopefully, he won't remind us next week that we passed on him.
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2008 8:04 am
by VetSkinsFan
Gibbs4Life wrote:I guess we can't blame jason for being soft since apparently he is known for that. Where the blame lies is on Vinny.
Gibbs4Life wrote:JT came to play against N.O.; I'm sticking to the theory that he reads message boards and this thread was his motivation
A little consistancy goes a long way....
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2008 12:24 pm
by markshark84
I was very happy with JT's play this week. I am not happy that we gave up a second rounder for him, but he was solid this week.
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2008 1:53 pm
by VetSkinsFan
markshark84 wrote:I was very happy with JT's play this week. I am not happy that we gave up a second rounder for him, but he was solid this week.
Everyone would be better off not worrying about what we already did and worry about what's happening now.
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 9:41 am
by markshark84
VetSkinsFan wrote:markshark84 wrote:I was very happy with JT's play this week. I am not happy that we gave up a second rounder for him, but he was solid this week.
Everyone would be better off not worrying about what we already did and worry about what's happening now.
That is a tough thing to do. People are really going to worry about it come april if JT doesn't make an impact or ends up hurt.
After last week, it appears that the move was a good one. I just get very touchy when it comes to our draft picks. I am one of those people that believes that you should trade for more and never give any away.
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 10:08 am
by Chris Luva Luva
markshark84 wrote:After last week, it appears that the move was a good one. I just get very touchy when it comes to our draft picks. I am one of those people that believes that you should trade for more and never give any away.
Although I have a similiar belief system, this is one situation where I feel it was warranted. Considering the circumstances of course...
Plus if you think we would survive in this division without a pass-rush from out front four, you're sadly mistaken.
Jason is simply buying is time to find an adequate replacement.
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 12:13 pm
by VetSkinsFan
Chris Luva Luva wrote:markshark84 wrote:After last week, it appears that the move was a good one. I just get very touchy when it comes to our draft picks. I am one of those people that believes that you should trade for more and never give any away.
Although I have a similiar belief system, this is one situation where I feel it was warranted. Considering the circumstances of course...
Plus if you think we would survive in this division without a pass-rush from out front four, you're sadly mistaken.
Jason is simply buying is time to find an adequate replacement.
I'm in total agreeance. I don't like trading picks, but sometimes you gotta bite the bullet, and I feel when Daniels went down, then that's what we did.
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 1:47 pm
by Deadskins
VetSkinsFan wrote:Chris Luva Luva wrote:markshark84 wrote:After last week, it appears that the move was a good one. I just get very touchy when it comes to our draft picks. I am one of those people that believes that you should trade for more and never give any away.
Although I have a similiar belief system, this is one situation where I feel it was warranted. Considering the circumstances of course...
Plus if you think we would survive in this division without a pass-rush from out front four, you're sadly mistaken.
Jason is simply buying is time to find an adequate replacement.
I'm in total agreeance. I don't like trading picks, but sometimes you gotta bite the bullet, and I feel when Daniels went down, then that's what we did.
Exactly, and we actually got good value for the pick as well. Originally Miami wanted more, but when a three-way deal, involving Shockey and the G-strings, fell through, we got him for less.
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 2:03 pm
by Chris Luva Luva
Hush now, rational thought it frowned upon.
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 4:31 pm
by PulpExposure
Chris Luva Luva wrote:Hush now, rational thought it frowned upon.
Cut
everyone?
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 4:39 pm
by Chris Luva Luva
PulpExposure wrote:Chris Luva Luva wrote:Hush now, rational thought it frowned upon.
Cut
everyone?
My typing skills have been horrid lately. "rational thought is frowned upon..."