PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE TRADE FOR OCHO CINCO!!!!!!

Fios · Post by **Fios** » Fri Apr 18, 2008 1:21 pm

PulpExposure wrote:
Fios wrote:But the guy doesn't even have enough pride to fix his spelling and grammatical errors so he'll certainly not trouble himself with errors in fact.

Lol. You're so snarky. I love it.

I get paid to be picky

LOSTHOG · Post by **LOSTHOG** » Fri Apr 18, 2008 1:40 pm

SkinsFreak wrote: I would just hate to see them trade high picks or break the bank for a disgruntled prima donna, especially at his age.

Big risk, big reward I guess. It worked out so for for the Pukes. I think if Danny thinks we can win now he will pull the trigger, but if he feels like we are still a few years away we will draft and develop a receiver. My 2 cents

Irn-Bru · Post by **Irn-Bru** » Fri Apr 18, 2008 2:16 pm

Can I just add that I love threads that trash JLC? Because that's all I have to say. . .

Countertrey · Post by **Countertrey** » Fri Apr 18, 2008 2:44 pm

Simple...

The best predictor of future behavior is past behavior.

Mr Cinco's current and recent past behavior is rife with petulance and tantrums.

Mr Cinco's more distant behavior is rife is show-boating and infantile oppositional defiance.

I just can't imagine what the future holds...

Please take him, Philly.

everydayAskinsday · Post by **everydayAskinsday** » Fri Apr 18, 2008 4:27 pm

surprised to see no one has posted the pic of Mr. Johnson himself holding up the Redskins #85 jersey with ocho cinco over the name of that one guy .. cant think of the name.. didnt really play much

yupchagee · Post by **yupchagee** » Fri Apr 18, 2008 9:49 pm

SkinsFreak wrote:
yupchagee wrote:Reporters miss state facts routinely. Our local paper is 95% fact free.

I understand that can happen. But do they correct it when they discover they were wrong, or do journalists just take a care free attitude and continue to print unverified and nonfactual reports with no ramifications or responsibility? Maybe they do, I don't know.

Many think that they are above accountability. That's why so many newspapers are losing circulation.

VetSkinsFan · Post by **VetSkinsFan** » Tue Apr 22, 2008 11:18 am

ESPN's Chris Mortensen reports the Redskins recently offered their first-round pick in 2008 and their third-rounder in 2009 for Chad Johnson.

The third-rounder could've escalated to a first-rounder based on performance in 2009, but the Redskins were turned down. Mort says this is the first "significant proposal" Cincinnati has received for Chad. There is a chance Washington will up its offer on draft day, but the Bengals aren't budging yet.

http://www.rotoworld.com/content/HeadLi ... &hl=115204

yupchagee · Post by **yupchagee** » Tue Apr 22, 2008 11:35 am

VetSkinsFan wrote:ESPN's Chris Mortensen reports the Redskins recently offered their first-round pick in 2008 and their third-rounder in 2009 for Chad Johnson.

The third-rounder could've escalated to a first-rounder based on performance in 2009, but the Redskins were turned down. Mort says this is the first "significant proposal" Cincinnati has received for Chad. There is a chance Washington will up its offer on draft day, but the Bengals aren't budging yet.

http://www.rotoworld.com/content/HeadLi ... &hl=115204

2 1st's is WAY too much for a 30 yr old with a bad attitude.

tribeofjudah · Post by **tribeofjudah** » Tue Apr 22, 2008 10:31 pm

NFL net just said that cinci turned down the Skins offer for 85....

GSPODS · Post by **GSPODS** » Wed Apr 23, 2008 3:29 am

yupchagee wrote:
VetSkinsFan wrote:ESPN's Chris Mortensen reports the Redskins recently offered their first-round pick in 2008 and their third-rounder in 2009 for Chad Johnson.

The third-rounder could've escalated to a first-rounder based on performance in 2009, but the Redskins were turned down. Mort says this is the first "significant proposal" Cincinnati has received for Chad. There is a chance Washington will up its offer on draft day, but the Bengals aren't budging yet.

http://www.rotoworld.com/content/HeadLi ... &hl=115204

2 1st's is WAY too much for a 30 yr old with a bad attitude.

So, would that make the Redskins stupid for offering?
Or, would that make the Bengals stupid for rejecting the offer?

JansenFan · Post by **JansenFan** » Wed Apr 23, 2008 8:02 am

GSPODS wrote:
yupchagee wrote:
VetSkinsFan wrote:ESPN's Chris Mortensen reports the Redskins recently offered their first-round pick in 2008 and their third-rounder in 2009 for Chad Johnson.

The third-rounder could've escalated to a first-rounder based on performance in 2009, but the Redskins were turned down. Mort says this is the first "significant proposal" Cincinnati has received for Chad. There is a chance Washington will up its offer on draft day, but the Bengals aren't budging yet.

http://www.rotoworld.com/content/HeadLi ... &hl=115204

2 1st's is WAY too much for a 30 yr old with a bad attitude.

So, would that make the Redskins stupid for offering?
Or, would that make the Bengals stupid for rejecting the offer?

yes

GSPODS · Post by **GSPODS** » Wed Apr 23, 2008 8:06 am

JansenFan wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
yupchagee wrote:
VetSkinsFan wrote:ESPN's Chris Mortensen reports the Redskins recently offered their first-round pick in 2008 and their third-rounder in 2009 for Chad Johnson.

The third-rounder could've escalated to a first-rounder based on performance in 2009, but the Redskins were turned down. Mort says this is the first "significant proposal" Cincinnati has received for Chad. There is a chance Washington will up its offer on draft day, but the Bengals aren't budging yet.

http://www.rotoworld.com/content/HeadLi ... &hl=115204

2 1st's is WAY too much for a 30 yr old with a bad attitude.

So, would that make the Redskins stupid for offering?
Or, would that make the Bengals stupid for rejecting the offer?

yes

J.F., Has anyone ever told you that you have a way with word?

JansenFan · Post by **JansenFan** » Wed Apr 23, 2008 8:13 am

GSPODS wrote:
JansenFan wrote:
GSPODS wrote:
yupchagee wrote:
VetSkinsFan wrote:ESPN's Chris Mortensen reports the Redskins recently offered their first-round pick in 2008 and their third-rounder in 2009 for Chad Johnson.

The third-rounder could've escalated to a first-rounder based on performance in 2009, but the Redskins were turned down. Mort says this is the first "significant proposal" Cincinnati has received for Chad. There is a chance Washington will up its offer on draft day, but the Bengals aren't budging yet.

http://www.rotoworld.com/content/HeadLi ... &hl=115204

2 1st's is WAY too much for a 30 yr old with a bad attitude.

So, would that make the Redskins stupid for offering?
Or, would that make the Bengals stupid for rejecting the offer?

yes

J.F., Has anyone ever told you that you have a way with word?

yes

Mursilis · Post by **Mursilis** » Wed Apr 23, 2008 9:46 am

yupchagee wrote:
VetSkinsFan wrote:ESPN's Chris Mortensen reports the Redskins recently offered their first-round pick in 2008 and their third-rounder in 2009 for Chad Johnson.

The third-rounder could've escalated to a first-rounder based on performance in 2009, but the Redskins were turned down. Mort says this is the first "significant proposal" Cincinnati has received for Chad. There is a chance Washington will up its offer on draft day, but the Bengals aren't budging yet.

http://www.rotoworld.com/content/HeadLi ... &hl=115204

2 1st's is WAY too much for a 30 yr old with a bad attitude.

What he said. ESPECIALLY given how many needs we still have. Our whole starting O-line is still all made up of guys who are 30+ and injury-prone (as a group; some of them play a whole season), and we need youth at other positions as well. I'd give no more than a single first-rounder for C. Johnson, and even that's a bit generous given his age. Better to just hold the pick and use it.