VetSkinsFan wrote:Hackett resigned 5yrs with Seattle....
Really? Good, I'm actually glad. That may mean they'll look to the draft for a WR.
Me too. No doubt about it, Hackett is a very talented guy. But we simply don't need a player that can't stay healthy and contribute on the field. I hope that we draft a receiver (I think I've now mentioned Sweed and Kelly in just about every thread), but I also wouldn't mind seeing us make a run at Bryant Johnson provided he comes at a reasonable price.
VetSkinsFan wrote:Hackett resigned 5yrs with Seattle....
Are you sure about that? I haven't been able to find anything about Hackett re-signing. The Seahawks did sign TJ Duckett to a 5 year deal yesterday; could you have gotten the two players mixed up?
Last edited by CanesSkins26 on Wed Mar 05, 2008 9:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
VetSkinsFan wrote:Hackett resigned 5yrs with Seattle....
Are you sure about that? I haven't been able to find anything about Hackett resigning. The Seahawks did sign TJ Duckett to a 5 year deal yesterday; could you have gotten the two players mixed up?
I haven't seen it anywhere either, also haven't heard anything about Bryant other than what comes from him or his agent
..__..
{o,o}
|)__)
-"-"-
When you reach the end of your rope, tie a knot in it and hold on....
I should have linked it. I KNOW that's what I read, but I can't find it. Maybe it was put out and rescinded, who knows.... that's what I get for not linking it....
...any given Sunday....
RIP #21 Sean Taylor. You will be loved and adored by Redskins fans forever!!!!!
GSPODS:
The National Anthem sucks.
What a useless piece of propagandist rhetoric that is.
Seahawks: Hackett could remain in Seattle The News
D.J. Hackett, who has received little interest on the open market, still has an interest in rejoining the Seattle Seahawks, according to the News Tribune. There are also reports that Buffalo might be interested in Hackett if talks with Bryant Johnson don't work out.
Our View
It appears that Hackett's vast injury history has put his free agency stock in a deep freeze. Hackett was placed on injured reserve missing the entire 2004 season due to a sports hernia injury. During the past three seasons, he has missed 15 starts due to various leg injuries.
VetSkinsFan wrote:I should have linked it. I KNOW that's what I read, but I can't find it. Maybe it was put out and rescinded, who knows.... that's what I get for not linking it....
VetSkinsFan wrote:I should have linked it. I KNOW that's what I read, but I can't find it. Maybe it was put out and rescinded, who knows.... that's what I get for not linking it....
VetSkinsFan wrote:I should have linked it. I KNOW that's what I read, but I can't find it. Maybe it was put out and rescinded, who knows.... that's what I get for not linking it....
VetSkinsFan wrote:I should have linked it. I KNOW that's what I read, but I can't find it. Maybe it was put out and rescinded, who knows.... that's what I get for not linking it....
VetSkinsFan wrote:I should have linked it. I KNOW that's what I read, but I can't find it. Maybe it was put out and rescinded, who knows.... that's what I get for not linking it....
CanesSkins26 wrote:Signing Hackett would be a terrible move. In just 4 NFL seasons he has missed over 30 games due to injury. We need a reliable receiver, not someone that you can count on to get hurt.
Holy Crap! I didn't know he missed that many games?!
If the Skins do sign him they should not pay that much for him, unless they put in some clause to protect him them in case he has two or three season ending injuries.
I don't have to sell my soul,
He's already in me,
I don't need to sell my soul,
He's already in me.
I wanna be adored
I wanna be adored.
I think the skins should go for a more incentive based contract offering. You don't put out, you don't get paid. That and put a modent cap on the draftee's initial contract and I think the NFL woul dbe a lot more competitive place.
...any given Sunday....
RIP #21 Sean Taylor. You will be loved and adored by Redskins fans forever!!!!!
GSPODS:
The National Anthem sucks.
What a useless piece of propagandist rhetoric that is.
VetSkinsFan wrote:I should have linked it. I KNOW that's what I read, but I can't find it. Maybe it was put out and rescinded, who knows.... that's what I get for not linking it....
VetSkinsFan wrote:I should have linked it. I KNOW that's what I read, but I can't find it. Maybe it was put out and rescinded, who knows.... that's what I get for not linking it....